𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
19K subscribers
853 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.11K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
🌟 #Debates@CurrentLegalGK

Radhakrishnan quotes The Mahabharata: "There is nothing impossible to be overcome by gentleness, and therefore the sharpest weapon we have is gentleness."

Radhakrishnan had described India as "In a symphony, different instruments, each with its particular sonority, each with its special sound, all combine to interpret one particular score".


Unity in Diversity and Fraternity.
❀‍πŸ”₯6πŸ‘4πŸ‘Œ1
#LegalMaxim@CurrentLeglGK

The expression β€œPer Legum Terrea” in the Magna Carta have come to mean β€œwithout due process of law”.

Legal Maxim for Article 21 and Maneka Gandhi.
πŸ‘9❀3πŸ‘Œ1
art35.pdf
181.4 KB
πŸ›οΈ Separation of Powers in India

✨ Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya v. State of Punjab, 1955
Honβ€Ÿble Chief Justice B.K. Mukherjea observed:
β€œThe Indian Constitution has not indeed recognised the doctrine of separation of powers in the absolute rigidity but the functions of the different parts or branches of the Government have been sufficiently differentiated and consequently it can very well be said that our Constitution does not contemplate assumption by one organ or part of the State of the functions that essentially belong to another.”
✨ In Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice Tendolkar, 1958
Honβ€Ÿble Chief Justice S.R. Das opined that in the absence of specific provision for separation of powers in our Constitution, such as there is under the American Constitution, some such division of powers legislative, executive and judicial- is nevertheless implicit in our Constitution.

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘5πŸ’―2πŸ‘Œ1
ConstitutionandConstitutionalism.pdf
468.8 KB
πŸ”– π™π™π™š π˜Ύπ™€π™£π™¨π™©π™žπ™©π™ͺπ™©π™žπ™€π™£ 𝙖𝙣𝙙 π˜Ύπ™€π™£π™¨π™©π™žπ™©π™ͺπ™©π™žπ™€π™£π™–π™‘π™žπ™¨π™’: 𝘼 π™˜π™€π™’π™₯π™–π™§π™–π™©π™žπ™«π™š 𝙖π™₯π™₯π™§π™€π™–π™˜π™

🏷 The Main purpose is to clarify the concept of these two Terminologies, i.e. Constitution and Constitutionalism.


@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘10🀩2
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Delivery Boy To Civil Judge – A Story That Inspires https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/advocate-yaseen-shan-muhammed-judicial-service-exam-second-rank-279617
His method of study was to focus on the basics like reading and understanding Bare Acts and case laws. He referred to KHC, Live Law for his preparation and research. He mentions that he does not believe in offering motivational tips to others, but firmly believes that hard work eventually pays off. Yaseen says, β€œRead judgments. Have subject knowledge. I don't think there is a shortcut. Rather than reading more and more things, try to understand what you have read. For me, Mains exam was the most difficult part. Since prelims was based on MCQs, I was confident of qualifying it. My weak point was English language. For Mains, Paper I is English. Since I studied in a Malayalam-medium school, it was difficult for me. Another difficulty was writing for a total of 12 hours in 2 consecutive days. There is a five-member panel for the interview and one cannot answer all the questions in the interview by adopting any shortcut methods of study. So read more in depth, practice as an advocate and try to understand things in the practical context. Apart from that, I don't think there is a shortcut.”
πŸ‘21🫑5πŸ‘Œ3πŸ’―3✍2
🧠 #Question@CurrentLegalGK

"If an accused was of sound mind while committing an offence but subsequently became of unsound mind after its commission, will the accused be tried & punished in the same manner as one who remains of sound mind?"
πŸ‘2😍1