β»οΈπποΈ
CASES -K.K. Verma v. Union of India, 1954 | Beharilal v. Bhuri Devi, 1997 |Gafoor Khan v. Amiruddin, 2012 | Anamika Mallick v. Ajoy Kumar Roy | Venkata Narsaiah v. Muddasani Sarojana, 2016
CONCLUSION
The remedy of Recovery of Possession of Immovable Property under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 encompasses the possessory title of the rightful possessor through the appropriate intervention by the court, it becomes essential because the Indian Contract Act, 1872 gives only compensation in case of breach of contract, hence such a remedy becomes necessary where damage is not ascertainable, and compensation is not an adequate relief.
#SRA #section_5_and_6
#section_145_of_crpc
πRead the difference here-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/365
@CurrentLegalGK
Recovery of immovable property CASES -
CONCLUSION
The remedy of Recovery of Possession of Immovable Property under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 encompasses the possessory title of the rightful possessor through the appropriate intervention by the court, it becomes essential because the Indian Contract Act, 1872 gives only compensation in case of breach of contract, hence such a remedy becomes necessary where damage is not ascertainable, and compensation is not an adequate relief.
#SRA #section_5_and_6
#section_145_of_crpc
πRead the difference here-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/365
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯6π2
π¨βππβοΈ
LEGAL CURRENT AFFAIRS PDFsπ₯3