AIBE 19 PYQ 2024 .pdf
7.7 MB
๐8โคโ๐ฅ2โค2
*PM เคฎเฅเคฆเฅ เคเฅ เคฎเคฟเคฒเคพ เคเฅเคตเฅเคค เคเคพ เคธเคฐเฅเคตเฅเคเฅเค เคธเคฎเฅเคฎเคพเคจ:* เคเคฐเฅเคกเคฐ เคเคซ เคฎเฅเคฌเคพเคฐเค เค
เคฒ เคเคฌเฅเคฐ เคชเคพเคจเฅ เคตเคพเคฒเฅ เคชเคนเคฒเฅ เคญเคพเคฐเคคเฅเคฏ PM; เค
เคฌ เคคเค 20 เคฆเฅเคถ เคเคฐ เคเฅเคเฅ เคธเคฎเฅเคฎเคพเคจเคฟเคค
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/8rSetIiUvPb
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/8rSetIiUvPb
Bhaskar
PM เคฎเฅเคฆเฅ เคเฅ เคฎเคฟเคฒเคพ เคเฅเคตเฅเคค เคเคพ เคธเคฐเฅเคตเฅเคเฅเค...
เคเคฐเฅเคกเคฐ เคเคซ เคฎเฅเคฌเคพเคฐเค เค
เคฒ เคเคฌเฅเคฐ เคชเคพเคจเฅ เคตเคพเคฒเฅ เคชเคนเคฒเฅ...
๐4๐1๐1
The Constitution, beyond fundamental rights
https://www.deccanherald.com//opinion/the-constitution-beyond-fundamental-rights-3327528
https://www.deccanherald.com//opinion/the-constitution-beyond-fundamental-rights-3327528
Deccan Herald
The Constitution, beyond fundamental rights
History tells us that fundamental rights can be interpreted in multiple ways. Privacy was held not to be a fundamental right in the 1950s and 1960s.
๐3
Litigant has no absolute right to appear as party-in-person: Punjab and Haryana High Court
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigant-no-absolute-right-appear-party-in-person-punjab-and-haryana-high-court
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigant-no-absolute-right-appear-party-in-person-punjab-and-haryana-high-court
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
Litigant has no absolute right to appear as party-in-person: Punjab and Haryana High Court
The Punjab and Haryana Court on Tuesday said a person has no absolute right to appear before the court as party-in-person before court in his case. Justice Sume
๐2
๐
๐Case- Riju Prasad Sarma vs State Of Assam, 2015
On the related issue of the scope of Article 12 and whether for the purposes of issuance of writ, judicial decisions by the judiciary can be included in State action, we are in agreement with the submissions advanced by Mr. Rajiv Dhavan that definition of โthe Stateโ under Article 12 is contextual depending upon all relevant facts including the concerned provisions in Part III of the Constitution. The definition is clearly inclusive and not exhaustive. Hence omission of judiciary when the government and Parliament of India as well as government and legislature of each of the State has been included is conspicuous but not conclusive that judiciary must be excluded. Relevant case laws cited by Mr. Dhavan are:-
Hence, in accordance with such judgments holding that judgments of High Court and Supreme Court cannot be subjected to writ jurisdiction and for want of requisite governmental control, Judiciary cannot be a State under Article 12, we also hold that while acting on the judicial side the courts are not included in the definition of the State.
๐Exception- Only when they deal with their employees or act in other matters purely in administrative capacity, the courts may fall within the definition of the State for attracting writ jurisdiction against their administrative actions only.
๐คReasoning- In our view, such a contextual interpretation must be preferred because it shall promote justice, especially through impartial adjudication in matters of protection of fundamental rights governed by Part III of the Constitution.
R/W- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2277
@CurrentLegalGK
Judicial Orders subject to writ jurisdiction or Not
๐Case- Riju Prasad Sarma vs State Of Assam, 2015
On the related issue of the scope of Article 12 and whether for the purposes of issuance of writ, judicial decisions by the judiciary can be included in State action, we are in agreement with the submissions advanced by Mr. Rajiv Dhavan that definition of โthe Stateโ under Article 12 is contextual depending upon all relevant facts including the concerned provisions in Part III of the Constitution. The definition is clearly inclusive and not exhaustive. Hence omission of judiciary when the government and Parliament of India as well as government and legislature of each of the State has been included is conspicuous but not conclusive that judiciary must be excluded. Relevant case laws cited by Mr. Dhavan are:-
(i) Pradeep Kr. Biswas vs. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology & Ors., (2002) 5 SCC 111
(ii) Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar And Ors vs. State of Maharashtra And Anr, (1966) 3 SCR 744
(iii) Triveniben vs. State of Gujarat, (1989) 1 SCC 678
(iv) Poonam vs. Sumit Tanwar, (2010) 4 SCC 460
Hence, in accordance with such judgments holding that judgments of High Court and Supreme Court cannot be subjected to writ jurisdiction and for want of requisite governmental control, Judiciary cannot be a State under Article 12, we also hold that while acting on the judicial side the courts are not included in the definition of the State.
๐Exception- Only when they deal with their employees or act in other matters purely in administrative capacity, the courts may fall within the definition of the State for attracting writ jurisdiction against their administrative actions only.
๐คReasoning- In our view, such a contextual interpretation must be preferred because it shall promote justice, especially through impartial adjudication in matters of protection of fundamental rights governed by Part III of the Constitution.
R/W- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2277
@CurrentLegalGK
๐5๐2โ1๐1๐คฉ1๐1๐ฏ1
When Defendant Can Be Asked To Begin Evidence In Suit? Supreme Court Explains Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/when-defendant-can-be-asked-to-begin-evidence-in-suit-supreme-court-explains-order-xviii-rule-1-cpc-278830
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/when-defendant-can-be-asked-to-begin-evidence-in-suit-supreme-court-explains-order-xviii-rule-1-cpc-278830
www.livelaw.in
When Defendant Can Be Asked To Begin Evidence In Suit? Supreme Court Explains Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC
In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court explained the circumstances under which a defendant gets the right to begin in a suit hearing as per Order XVIII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code.As per...
๐4
What is the Difference Between Vakalatnama, Power of Attorney and Memo of Appearance?- Know Here - Law Trend
https://lawtrend.in/what-is-the-difference-between-vakalatnama-power-of-attorney-and-memo-of-appearance-know-here/
https://lawtrend.in/what-is-the-difference-between-vakalatnama-power-of-attorney-and-memo-of-appearance-know-here/
Law Trend - Legal News Network
What is the Difference Between Vakalatnama, Power of Attorney and Memo of Appearance?- Know Here - Law Trend
In day to day proceedings of Court terms like Vakalatnama, Memo of Appearance and Power of Attorney are very frequently used. - Power of Attorney - Law Trend
๐2๐1๐1
100+_Supreme_Court_Judgements_Mains_Marks_Booster_Series_2024.pdf
2.2 MB
100 landmark judgments Supreme Court Judgements - Mains Marks Booster Series 2024
๐6โคโ๐ฅ2๐คฉ1๐1
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ex-supreme-court-judge-v-ramasubramanian-appointed-nhrc-chief/articleshow/116601429.cms
๐ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฉ. ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป
(as Member of Bench) ----
โก๏ธ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ฎ ๐ค๐ ๐พ๐๐ง๐๐ช๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐๐ก ๐๐ซ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ ๐ฝ๐ง๐๐๐๐ง๐ฎ ๐พ๐๐จ๐๐จ
- Neeraj Dutta v State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
โก๏ธ๐๐ช๐ข๐ข๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐ฌ ๐ผ๐๐๐ช๐จ๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฉ๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ ๐ช๐๐๐ข๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐๐จ ๐ฟ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐
- Sukhpal Singh Khaira v State of Punjab
โก๏ธ๐พ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐ฃ๐๐ค๐ฃ'๐จ 2016 ๐ฟ๐๐ข๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐๐จ๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐
- Vivek Narayan Sharma v Union of India
โก๏ธ๐ผ๐ฏ๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐ฃ - ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ค๐ข ๐ค๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ฅ๐ง๐๐จ๐จ๐๐ค๐ฃ
- Kaushal Kishore v State Of Uttar Pradesh
โก๏ธ๐๐๐ญ๐ช๐๐ก ๐๐๐ง๐๐จ๐จ๐ข๐๐ฃ๐ฉ & ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐พ๐ ๐
- In Re: Matter of Great Public Importance touching upon the Independence of Judiciary
โโ
๐พ๐๐ฃ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ก๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐พ ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ ๐๐ฃ๐ฎ ๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐ช๐๐๐ โโ
๐ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฉ. ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป
(as Member of Bench) ----
โก๏ธ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ฎ ๐ค๐ ๐พ๐๐ง๐๐ช๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐๐ก ๐๐ซ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ ๐ฝ๐ง๐๐๐๐ง๐ฎ ๐พ๐๐จ๐๐จ
- Neeraj Dutta v State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
โก๏ธ๐๐ช๐ข๐ข๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐ฌ ๐ผ๐๐๐ช๐จ๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฉ๐๐ง ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ ๐ช๐๐๐ข๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐๐จ ๐ฟ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐
- Sukhpal Singh Khaira v State of Punjab
โก๏ธ๐พ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐ฃ๐๐ค๐ฃ'๐จ 2016 ๐ฟ๐๐ข๐ค๐ฃ๐๐ฉ๐๐จ๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐
- Vivek Narayan Sharma v Union of India
โก๏ธ๐ผ๐ฏ๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐ฃ - ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ค๐ข ๐ค๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ฅ๐ง๐๐จ๐จ๐๐ค๐ฃ
- Kaushal Kishore v State Of Uttar Pradesh
โก๏ธ๐๐๐ญ๐ช๐๐ก ๐๐๐ง๐๐จ๐จ๐ข๐๐ฃ๐ฉ & ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐พ๐ ๐
- In Re: Matter of Great Public Importance touching upon the Independence of Judiciary
โโ
๐พ๐๐ฃ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ก๐๐๐ฃ๐ฉ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐พ ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ ๐๐ฃ๐ฎ ๐ก๐๐ฃ๐๐ช๐๐๐ โโ
The Times of India
Ex-Supreme Court judge V Ramasubramanian appointed NHRC chief | India News - Times of India
India News: Former Supreme Court judge V Ramasubramanian was appointed chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission of India (NHRC). The position was vaca
๐4โคโ๐ฅ1๐1
๐3๐1
100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2024 - Part 2 [26-50]
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/100-important-supreme-court-judgments-of-2024-part-2-26-50-279164
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/100-important-supreme-court-judgments-of-2024-part-2-26-50-279164
www.livelaw.in
100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2024 - Part 2 [26-50]
Part 1 can be read here. Part 3 can be read here. Part 4 can be read here.26. Judicial Service | 'High Score In Written Exam Alone Doesn't Determine Merit' : Supreme Court Upholds Minimum Mark...
๐2โคโ๐ฅ1๐1
Conditions To Invoke S. 53A Transfer Of Property Act : Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/conditions-to-invoke-s-53a-transfer-of-property-act-supreme-court-explains-279281
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/conditions-to-invoke-s-53a-transfer-of-property-act-supreme-court-explains-279281
www.livelaw.in
Conditions To Invoke S. 53A Transfer Of Property Act : Supreme Court Explains
The Supreme Court recently observed that the transferee cannot claim protection under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (โTPAโ) if he fails to prove the execution of a sale...
๐4
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Conditions To Invoke S. 53A Transfer Of Property Act : Supreme Court Explains https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/conditions-to-invoke-s-53a-transfer-of-property-act-supreme-court-explains-279281
According to the Court, the protection of a prospective purchaser/transferee of his possession of the property involved under Section 53A TPA is available subject to the following prerequisites:
โ(a) There is a contract in writing by the transferor for transfer for consideration of any immovable property signed by him or on his behalf, from which the terms necessary to constitute the transfer can be ascertained with reasonable certainty;
(b) The transferee has, in part-performance of the contract, taken possession of the property or any part thereof, or the transferee, being already in possession, continues in possession in part-performance of the contract;
(c) The transferee has done some act in furtherance of the contract and has performed or is willing to perform his part of the contract.โ
โ(a) There is a contract in writing by the transferor for transfer for consideration of any immovable property signed by him or on his behalf, from which the terms necessary to constitute the transfer can be ascertained with reasonable certainty;
(b) The transferee has, in part-performance of the contract, taken possession of the property or any part thereof, or the transferee, being already in possession, continues in possession in part-performance of the contract;
(c) The transferee has done some act in furtherance of the contract and has performed or is willing to perform his part of the contract.โ
๐7๐1
App of Evi by DMJ.pdf
319.2 KB
๐งช๐ญ
2 First Information Report
3 Inquest Report
4 Evidentiary Value of Statements Recorded Under Secs.161 & 164 Cr.P.C.
5 Confession
6 Extra-Judicial Confession
7 Confession of Co Accused Retracted Confession
8 Section 27 Recovery
9 Dying Declaration
10 Case Diary
11 Common Intention And Common Object
12 Conspiracy
13 Test Identification Parade
14 Expert Opinion
15 Dna Test
16 Circumstantial Evidence
17 Conduct of Witness and Conduct of Accused
18 Non-Explanation of Injuries
19 Witnesses
APPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE
IN SESSIONS CASES
@CurrentLegalGK
Appreciation of Evidence or Evidentiary value of
2 First Information Report
3 Inquest Report
4 Evidentiary Value of Statements Recorded Under Secs.161 & 164 Cr.P.C.
5 Confession
6 Extra-Judicial Confession
7 Confession of Co Accused Retracted Confession
8 Section 27 Recovery
9 Dying Declaration
10 Case Diary
11 Common Intention And Common Object
12 Conspiracy
13 Test Identification Parade
14 Expert Opinion
15 Dna Test
16 Circumstantial Evidence
17 Conduct of Witness and Conduct of Accused
18 Non-Explanation of Injuries
19 Witnesses
APPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE
IN SESSIONS CASES
@CurrentLegalGK
๐14๐5๐คฉ1๐1
๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ง
๐ Descending Order Subjects:-
โEnglish Language
โLegal, All Major, Minor and local laws.
โHindi Language
โHistory including Constituional.
โOther GK and Computer.
๐โฝ Play Nowโ
https://t.me/LegalQuizzes
THE GAME IS ONApproximately 3.5 Lakh MCQs have been Practiced
๐ Descending Order Subjects:-
โEnglish Language
โLegal, All Major, Minor and local laws.
โHindi Language
โHistory including Constituional.
โOther GK and Computer.
๐โฝ Play Nowโ
https://t.me/LegalQuizzes
๐4๐คฉ2โก1๐1
๐ฅณ Happy Birthday ๐
๐ฆ๐ฃ๐ง
BNSSU, BNSU, BSAU
Ek Saal Ka Hogaya Pata Bhi nahi Chala, bohot so ko.
Lekin Ab Chattisgarh Ne Panga Kar diya hai.
But Hum to Tayar the ye 1 Saal ke Prodigy ko pehele hi padh chuke.
Aap ko bhi Padhna hai to VC Recordings Dekhlein.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ฆ๐ฃ๐ง
BNSSU, BNSU, BSAU
Ek Saal Ka Hogaya Pata Bhi nahi Chala, bohot so ko.
Lekin Ab Chattisgarh Ne Panga Kar diya hai.
But Hum to Tayar the ye 1 Saal ke Prodigy ko pehele hi padh chuke.
Aap ko bhi Padhna hai to VC Recordings Dekhlein.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐13๐3๐1๐1๐ฏ1
A_Critical_Analysis_of_the_Concept_of_No_Fault_Liability_in_a_Welfare.pdf
342.1 KB
๐
@CurrentLegalGK
A Critical Analysis of the Concept of No-Fault Liability in a Welfare State Motor Vehicles Act, 1988@CurrentLegalGK
๐2
Forwarded from Rohit Jain
Happy birthday๐
With Unhappy mind๐
Kyu aaye tum kya jarurat thi
Kisne bulaya tha tumhe
Electronic evidence to tum phle hi la chuke the
Women Against offence tum la hi chuke the phle
Kya jarurat thi aane ki
Hme kitni preshani hui tumhre aane
Aaj bhi 420 ko 318 or 302 ko 101 kehne vo maja nhi aata
Jo cognizance 190 me lene me maja aata tha vh ab 210 me nhi aata
Akhir kyu aaye tum ๐ญ
Chlo ab aa gye ho to sath dena hm bhi apna lege tumhe
Happy birthday BNSS saa, BNS saa, BSA saa๐ฅฐ
With Unhappy mind๐
Kyu aaye tum kya jarurat thi
Kisne bulaya tha tumhe
Electronic evidence to tum phle hi la chuke the
Women Against offence tum la hi chuke the phle
Kya jarurat thi aane ki
Hme kitni preshani hui tumhre aane
Aaj bhi 420 ko 318 or 302 ko 101 kehne vo maja nhi aata
Jo cognizance 190 me lene me maja aata tha vh ab 210 me nhi aata
Akhir kyu aaye tum ๐ญ
Chlo ab aa gye ho to sath dena hm bhi apna lege tumhe
Happy birthday BNSS saa, BNS saa, BSA saa๐ฅฐ
๐22๐5๐3