🌟 Today is Winter Solstice

👻😨 Longest Night and shortest Day

Equilux v. Equinox

@CurrentLegalGK

🤞🌠 To Those appearing in AIBE, BEST OF LUCK

Bhailog AIBE me Fod ke ana Aur 💯/💯 lana 😎

@CurrentLegalGK

2024 Round-Up| Constitution Bench Decisions Of Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/2024-round-up-constitution-bench-decisions-of-supreme-court-279159

AIBE 19 PYQ 2024 SET-C

Credits: AKR
@CurrentLegalGK

*PM मोदी को मिला कुवैत का सर्वोच्च सम्मान:* ऑर्डर ऑफ मुबारक अल कबीर पाने वाले पहले भारतीय PM; अब तक 20 देश कर चुके सम्मानित
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/8rSetIiUvPb

The Constitution, beyond fundamental rights
https://www.deccanherald.com//opinion/the-constitution-beyond-fundamental-rights-3327528

Importance of other provisions of Constitutions other than Fundamental Rights.

@CurrentLegalGK

Litigant has no absolute right to appear as party-in-person: Punjab and Haryana High Court
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigant-no-absolute-right-appear-party-in-person-punjab-and-haryana-high-court

🌟 Judicial Orders subject to writ jurisdiction or Not

🌟Case- Riju Prasad Sarma vs State Of Assam, 2015

On the related issue of the scope of Article 12 and whether for the purposes of issuance of writ, judicial decisions by the judiciary can be included in State action, we are in agreement with the submissions advanced by Mr. Rajiv Dhavan that definition of ‘the State’ under Article 12 is contextual depending upon all relevant facts including the concerned provisions in Part III of the Constitution. The definition is clearly inclusive and not exhaustive. Hence omission of judiciary when the government and Parliament of India as well as government and legislature of each of the State has been included is conspicuous but not conclusive that judiciary must be excluded. Relevant case laws cited by Mr. Dhavan are:-

(i) Pradeep Kr. Biswas vs. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology & Ors., (2002) 5 SCC 111

(ii) Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar And Ors vs. State of Maharashtra And Anr, (1966) 3 SCR 744

(iii) Triveniben vs. State of Gujarat, (1989) 1 SCC 678

(iv) Poonam vs. Sumit Tanwar, (2010) 4 SCC 460

Hence, in accordance with such judgments holding that judgments of High Court and Supreme Court cannot be subjected to writ jurisdiction and for want of requisite governmental control, Judiciary cannot be a State under Article 12, we also hold that while acting on the judicial side the courts are not included in the definition of the State.

👍Exception- Only when they deal with their employees or act in other matters purely in administrative capacity, the courts may fall within the definition of the State for attracting writ jurisdiction against their administrative actions only.

🤔Reasoning- In our view, such a contextual interpretation must be preferred because it shall promote justice, especially through impartial adjudication in matters of protection of fundamental rights governed by Part III of the Constitution.

R/W- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2277

@CurrentLegalGK

When Defendant Can Be Asked To Begin Evidence In Suit? Supreme Court Explains Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/when-defendant-can-be-asked-to-begin-evidence-in-suit-supreme-court-explains-order-xviii-rule-1-cpc-278830

What is the Difference Between Vakalatnama, Power of Attorney and Memo of Appearance?- Know Here - Law Trend
https://lawtrend.in/what-is-the-difference-between-vakalatnama-power-of-attorney-and-memo-of-appearance-know-here/

Misuse of Writs
@CurrentLegalGK

100 landmark judgments Supreme Court Judgements - Mains Marks Booster Series 2024

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ex-supreme-court-judge-v-ramasubramanian-appointed-nhrc-chief/articleshow/116601429.cms

🌟 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗩. 𝗥𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻
(as Member of Bench) ----


⚡️𝙑𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝘾𝙞𝙧𝙘𝙪𝙢𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙀𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝘽𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝘾𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙨
- Neeraj Dutta v State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

⚡️𝙎𝙪𝙢𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝘼𝙘𝙘𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝘼𝙛𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙅𝙪𝙙𝙜𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝘿𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙
- Sukhpal Singh Khaira v State of Punjab

⚡️𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣'𝙨 2016 𝘿𝙚𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙨𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙎𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙢𝙚
- Vivek Narayan Sharma v Union of India

⚡️𝘼𝙯𝙖𝙢 𝙆𝙝𝙖𝙣 - 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙙𝙤𝙢 𝙤𝙛 𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙚𝙘𝙝 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙀𝙭𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣
- Kaushal Kishore v State Of Uttar Pradesh

⚡️𝙎𝙚𝙭𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙃𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 & 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙅𝙄
- In Re: Matter of Great Public Importance touching upon the Independence of Judiciary



❓❓
𝘾𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙉𝙃𝙍𝘾 𝙗𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙪𝙖𝙜𝙚 ❓❓

🌟 So, No old criminal Laws in Chattisgarh?

What Say?

@CurrentLegalGK

100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2024 - Part 2 [26-50]
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/100-important-supreme-court-judgments-of-2024-part-2-26-50-279164

Conditions To Invoke S. 53A Transfer Of Property Act : Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/conditions-to-invoke-s-53a-transfer-of-property-act-supreme-court-explains-279281

According to the Court, the protection of a prospective purchaser/transferee of his possession of the property involved under Section 53A TPA is available subject to the following prerequisites:
“(a) There is a contract in writing by the transferor for transfer for consideration of any immovable property signed by him or on his behalf, from which the terms necessary to constitute the transfer can be ascertained with reasonable certainty;
(b) The transferee has, in part-performance of the contract, taken possession of the property or any part thereof, or the transferee, being already in possession, continues in possession in part-performance of the contract;
(c) The transferee has done some act in furtherance of the contract and has performed or is willing to perform his part of the contract.”

🧪🔭 Appreciation of Evidence or Evidentiary value of


2 First Information Report
3 Inquest Report
4 Evidentiary Value of Statements Recorded Under Secs.161 & 164 Cr.P.C.
5 Confession
6 Extra-Judicial Confession
7 Confession of Co Accused Retracted Confession
8 Section 27 Recovery
9 Dying Declaration
10 Case Diary
11 Common Intention And Common Object
12 Conspiracy
13 Test Identification Parade
14 Expert Opinion
15 Dna Test
16 Circumstantial Evidence
17 Conduct of Witness and Conduct of Accused
18 Non-Explanation of Injuries
19 Witnesses

APPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE
IN SESSIONS CASES

@CurrentLegalGK