๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
853 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.1K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2024 - Part 1 [1-25] https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/100-important-supreme-court-judgments-of-2024-part-1-1-25-279081
๐Ÿ—“๏ธ๐Ÿ“™ Now see we will also make a list of around 150-180 judgments by compiling from good sources including this but it will take 1 month time due to my buzy schedule.

You can currently read them afterwards you can use our own compiled one for 2024 ๐Ÿค


This time you will get the best compilation of importanr judgments to enhance your mains answers for 2025 exam as well as answer the MCQs based on recent cases in judicial services and other related exams.

https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4505
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4490
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4540
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4565
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4574
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4564
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4575
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4580

โœ“Supreme court chronicle
โœ“live law
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4660?single
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4880
โœ“ Magazine
J, R, P
โœ“ https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4063
๐Ÿ‘18๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ™1
๐ŸŒŸ Important for UGC-NET

https://www.drishtiias.com/to-the-points/paper3/environmental-impact-assessment-1

- Sections 3, 5(a), 6, 7, 8 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 contain inherent idea of Environment Impact Assessment by Central Government. Necessary steps regarding the same can be taken by Central Government.

https://moef.gov.in/environmental-impact-assessment-eia


* Note -
You can download the EIA report from the MoEF website (http://moef.nic.in/) if the project got/recommended for the clearance. Or you can get it from the District/State pollution control board through RTI or may be directly.

.
๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿ˜1
*PM เคฎเฅ‹เคฆเฅ€ เค•เฅ‹ เคฎเคฟเคฒเคพ เค•เฅเคตเฅˆเคค เค•เคพ เคธเคฐเฅเคตเฅ‹เคšเฅเคš เคธเคฎเฅเคฎเคพเคจ:* เค‘เคฐเฅเคกเคฐ เค‘เคซ เคฎเฅเคฌเคพเคฐเค• เค…เคฒ เค•เคฌเฅ€เคฐ เคชเคพเคจเฅ‡ เคตเคพเคฒเฅ‡ เคชเคนเคฒเฅ‡ เคญเคพเคฐเคคเฅ€เคฏ PM; เค…เคฌ เคคเค• 20 เคฆเฅ‡เคถ เค•เคฐ เคšเฅเค•เฅ‡ เคธเคฎเฅเคฎเคพเคจเคฟเคค
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/8rSetIiUvPb
๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ˜1
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
*PM เคฎเฅ‹เคฆเฅ€ เค•เฅ‹ เคฎเคฟเคฒเคพ เค•เฅเคตเฅˆเคค เค•เคพ เคธเคฐเฅเคตเฅ‹เคšเฅเคš เคธเคฎเฅเคฎเคพเคจ:* เค‘เคฐเฅเคกเคฐ เค‘เคซ เคฎเฅเคฌเคพเคฐเค• เค…เคฒ เค•เคฌเฅ€เคฐ เคชเคพเคจเฅ‡ เคตเคพเคฒเฅ‡ เคชเคนเคฒเฅ‡ เคญเคพเคฐเคคเฅ€เคฏ PM; เค…เคฌ เคคเค• 20 เคฆเฅ‡เคถ เค•เคฐ เคšเฅเค•เฅ‡ เคธเคฎเฅเคฎเคพเคจเคฟเคค https://dainik.bhaskar.com/8rSetIiUvPb
๐Ÿ™‚
๐Ÿ˜3๐Ÿ˜‡1
๐ŸŒŸ Judicial Orders subject to writ jurisdiction or Not

๐ŸŒŸCase- Riju Prasad Sarma vs State Of Assam, 2015

On the related issue of the scope of Article 12 and whether for the purposes of issuance of writ, judicial decisions by the judiciary can be included in State action, we are in agreement with the submissions advanced by Mr. Rajiv Dhavan that definition of โ€˜the Stateโ€™ under Article 12 is contextual depending upon all relevant facts including the concerned provisions in Part III of the Constitution. The definition is clearly inclusive and not exhaustive. Hence omission of judiciary when the government and Parliament of India as well as government and legislature of each of the State has been included is conspicuous but not conclusive that judiciary must be excluded. Relevant case laws cited by Mr. Dhavan are:-
(i) Pradeep Kr. Biswas vs. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology & Ors., (2002) 5 SCC 111

(ii) Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar And Ors vs. State of Maharashtra And Anr, (1966) 3 SCR 744

(iii) Triveniben vs. State of Gujarat, (1989) 1 SCC 678

(iv) Poonam vs. Sumit Tanwar, (2010) 4 SCC 460


Hence, in accordance with such judgments holding that judgments of High Court and Supreme Court cannot be subjected to writ jurisdiction and for want of requisite governmental control, Judiciary cannot be a State under Article 12, we also hold that while acting on the judicial side the courts are not included in the definition of the State.

๐Ÿ‘Exception- Only when they deal with their employees or act in other matters purely in administrative capacity, the courts may fall within the definition of the State for attracting writ jurisdiction against their administrative actions only.

๐Ÿค”Reasoning- In our view, such a contextual interpretation must be preferred because it shall promote justice, especially through impartial adjudication in matters of protection of fundamental rights governed by Part III of the Constitution.

R/W- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2277

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ‘Œ2โœ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿคฉ1๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ’ฏ1
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ex-supreme-court-judge-v-ramasubramanian-appointed-nhrc-chief/articleshow/116601429.cms

๐ŸŒŸ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ฉ. ๐—ฅ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป
(as Member of Bench) ----


โšก๏ธ๐™‘๐™–๐™ก๐™ž๐™™๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™ค๐™› ๐˜พ๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ช๐™ข๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™–๐™ก ๐™€๐™ซ๐™ž๐™™๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™š๐™ง๐™ฎ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™จ๐™š๐™จ
- Neeraj Dutta v State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

โšก๏ธ๐™Ž๐™ช๐™ข๐™ข๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™‰๐™š๐™ฌ ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ช๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐˜ผ๐™›๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™…๐™ช๐™™๐™œ๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™ž๐™จ ๐˜ฟ๐™š๐™ก๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™ง๐™š๐™™
- Sukhpal Singh Khaira v State of Punjab

โšก๏ธ๐˜พ๐™๐™–๐™ก๐™ก๐™š๐™ฃ๐™œ๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ'๐™จ 2016 ๐˜ฟ๐™š๐™ข๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™จ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™Ž๐™˜๐™๐™š๐™ข๐™š
- Vivek Narayan Sharma v Union of India

โšก๏ธ๐˜ผ๐™ฏ๐™–๐™ข ๐™†๐™๐™–๐™ฃ - ๐™๐™ง๐™š๐™š๐™™๐™ค๐™ข ๐™ค๐™› ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™š๐™š๐™˜๐™ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™€๐™ญ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ
- Kaushal Kishore v State Of Uttar Pradesh

โšก๏ธ๐™Ž๐™š๐™ญ๐™ช๐™–๐™ก ๐™ƒ๐™–๐™ง๐™–๐™จ๐™จ๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ & ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐˜พ๐™…๐™„
- In Re: Matter of Great Public Importance touching upon the Independence of Judiciary



โ“โ“
๐˜พ๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™ก๐™–๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™‰๐™ƒ๐™๐˜พ ๐™—๐™š ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฎ ๐™ก๐™–๐™ฃ๐™œ๐™ช๐™–๐™œ๐™š โ“โ“
๐Ÿ‘4โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜1