๐๏ธ๐
The Tussle Between Personal Laws And Fundamental Rights
Narasu appamali and sabrimala Judgement
Uniform civil code
@CurrentLegalGK
1. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-9760-the-tussle-between-personal-laws-and-fundamental-rights.html
2. https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/justice-narimans-revival-of-doctrine-of-manifest-arbitrariness-to-strike-down-legislation-150312.
Are personal law; law under Article 13
The Tussle Between Personal Laws And Fundamental Rights
Narasu appamali and sabrimala Judgement
Uniform civil code
@CurrentLegalGK
1. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-9760-the-tussle-between-personal-laws-and-fundamental-rights.html
2. https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/justice-narimans-revival-of-doctrine-of-manifest-arbitrariness-to-strike-down-legislation-150312.
Legalserviceindia
The Tussle Between Personal Laws And Fundamental Rights
Any law that violates fundamental rights can be struck down by the Supreme
Court or any of the High Courts as far as the article 13 of the constitution is
concerned. This article clearly states...
Court or any of the High Courts as far as the article 13 of the constitution is
concerned. This article clearly states...
Justice Nariman's Revival Of Doctrine Of "Manifest Arbitrariness" To Strike Down Legislation
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/justice-narimans-revival-of-doctrine-of-manifest-arbitrariness-to-strike-down-legislation-150312
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/justice-narimans-revival-of-doctrine-of-manifest-arbitrariness-to-strike-down-legislation-150312
www.livelaw.in
Justice Nariman's Revival Of Doctrine Of "Manifest Arbitrariness" To Strike Down Legislation
Manifest Arbitrariness in a legislation is a ground for a Constitutional Court to strike it down as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The test to determine "manifest...
๐ฅ2
Speedy trial of civil cases[Yashpal Jain v. Sushila Dev]
โ All courts at district and taluka levels shall ensure proper execution of the summons and in a time bound manner as prescribed under Order V Rule (2) of CPC and same shall be monitored by Principal District Judges and after collating the statistics they shall forward the same to be placed before the committee constituted by the High Court for its consideration and monitoring.
โ All courts at District and Taluka level shall ensure that written statement is filed within the prescribed limit namely as prescribed under Order VIII Rule 1 and preferably within 30 days and to assign reasons in writing as to why the time limit is being extended beyond 30 days as indicated under proviso to sub-Rule (1) of Order VIII of CPC.
โ All courts at Districts and Talukas shall ensure after the pleadings are complete, the parties should be called upon to appear on the day fixed as indicated in Order X and record the admissions and denials and the court shall direct the parties to the suit to opt for either mode of the settlement outside the court as specified in sub-Section (1) of Section 89 and at the option of the parties shall fix the date of appearance before such forum or authority and in the event of the parties opting to any one of the modes of settlement directions be issued to appear on the date, time and venue fixed and the parties shall so appear before such authority/forum without any further notice at such designated place and time and it shall also be made clear in the reference order that trial is fixed beyond the period of two months making it clear that in the event of ADR not being fruitful, the trial would commence on the next day so fixed and would proceed on day-to-day basis.
โ In the event of the partyโs failure to opt for ADR namely resolution of dispute as prescribed under Section 89(1) the court should frame the issues for its determination within one week preferably, in the open court.
โ Fixing of the date of trial shall be in consultation with the learned advocates appearing for the parties to enable them to adjust their calendar. Once the date of trial is fixed, the trial should proceed accordingly to the extent possible, on day-to-day basis.
โ Learned trial judges of District and Taluka Courts shall as far as possible maintain the diary for ensuring that only such number of cases as can be handled on any given day for trial and complete the recording of evidence so as to avoid overcrowding of the cases and as a sequence of it would result in adjournment being sought and thereby preventing any inconvenience being caused to the stakeholders.
โ The counsels representing the parties may be enlightened of the provisions of Order XI and Order XII so as to narrow down the scope of dispute and it would be also the onerous responsibility of the Bar Associations and Bar Councils to have periodical refresher courses and preferably by virtual mode.
โ The trial courts shall scrupulously, meticulously and without fail comply with the provisions of Rule 1 of Order XVII and once the trial has commenced it shall be proceeded from day to day as contemplated under the proviso to Rule (2).
โ The courts shall give meaningful effect to the provisions for payment of cost for ensuring that no adjournment is sought for procrastination of the litigation and the opposite party is suitably compensated in the event of such adjournment is being granted.
At conclusion of trial the oral arguments shall be heard immediately and continuously and judgment be pronounced within the period stipulated under Order XX of CPC.
โ The statistics relating to the cases pending in each court beyond 5 years shall be forwarded by every presiding officer to the Principal District Judge once in a month who (Principal District Judge/District Judge) shall collate the same and forward it to the review committee constituted by the respective High Courts for enabling it to take further steps.
๐6
โ
The Committee so constituted by the Honโble Chief Justice of the respective States shall meet at least once in two months and direct such corrective measures to be taken by concerned court as deemed fit and shall also monitor the old cases (preferably which are pending for more than 05 years) constantly.
#pending_cases
#speedy_trial
#essay
@CurrentLegalGK
#pending_cases
#speedy_trial
#essay
@CurrentLegalGK
๐1
Why did the Supreme Court not allow same-sex marriage? | Explained - https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-did-the-supreme-court-not-allow-same-sex-marriage-explained/article67446993.ece, For the best experience read this on The Hindu App. https://bit.ly/THNewsApp
The Hindu
Why did the Supreme Court not allow same-sex marriage? | Explained
Why did the Supreme Court not allow the Special Marriage Act to be used for queer couples to get married? Will the legislature be open to enacting a law to make same-sex marriage legal?
Legal current.pdf
662.5 KB
Principles To Dying Declaration S.32(1) #evidence_act
Paranagounda vs State of Karnataka 2023
+
Abhishek Sharma vs Govt of NCT Delhi 2023
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ฅ8๐1
evidence topics+ case list.pdf
5.4 MB
๐ฅ6โ1
Forwarded from ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ b๐ฒ- ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ (Admin)
Legal article - Questions in parliament by MPs
BRIBE Issue
BRIBE Issue
๐4
How Laws Are Made In India
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/parliament-constitution-bills-laws-india-240655
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/parliament-constitution-bills-laws-india-240655
www.livelaw.in
How Laws Are Made In India
Recently Parliament has introduced the 3 Bills in Criminal Major Acts ; Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Bills to( replace CRPC), Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita Bills to ( replace IPC) and Bhartiya...
๐ฅ1
Navigating The Jurisprudence Of Obscenity Laws In And Around India: An Examination Of Legal Interpretations
https://www.livelaw.in/lawschool/articles/navigating-the-jurisprudence-of-obscenity-laws-in-and-around-india-an-examination-of-legal-interpretations-240830
https://www.livelaw.in/lawschool/articles/navigating-the-jurisprudence-of-obscenity-laws-in-and-around-india-an-examination-of-legal-interpretations-240830
www.livelaw.in
Navigating The Jurisprudence Of Obscenity Laws In And Around India: An Examination Of Legal Interpretations
In a recent ruling by the Bombay High Court, dated October 12, 2023, it was held that provocative dance performances and suggestive gestures by women do not constitute "obscene" or "immoral" acts....
๐ฅ1
โป๏ธ๐๐๏ธ
CASES -K.K. Verma v. Union of India, 1954 | Beharilal v. Bhuri Devi, 1997 |Gafoor Khan v. Amiruddin, 2012 | Anamika Mallick v. Ajoy Kumar Roy | Venkata Narsaiah v. Muddasani Sarojana, 2016
CONCLUSION
The remedy of Recovery of Possession of Immovable Property under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 encompasses the possessory title of the rightful possessor through the appropriate intervention by the court, it becomes essential because the Indian Contract Act, 1872 gives only compensation in case of breach of contract, hence such a remedy becomes necessary where damage is not ascertainable, and compensation is not an adequate relief.
#SRA #section_5_and_6
#section_145_of_crpc
๐Read the difference here-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/365
@CurrentLegalGK
Recovery of immovable property CASES -
CONCLUSION
The remedy of Recovery of Possession of Immovable Property under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 encompasses the possessory title of the rightful possessor through the appropriate intervention by the court, it becomes essential because the Indian Contract Act, 1872 gives only compensation in case of breach of contract, hence such a remedy becomes necessary where damage is not ascertainable, and compensation is not an adequate relief.
#SRA #section_5_and_6
#section_145_of_crpc
๐Read the difference here-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/365
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ฅ6๐2
๐จโ๐๐โ๏ธ
LEGAL CURRENT AFFAIRS PDFs๐ฅ3