๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
Previously in November 1948, Professor KT Shah had moved an amendment to Article 1(1) of the Constitution. Shah had suggested that "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Secular, Federalist, Socialist Union of States".

HV Kamath presciently saying that the words "secular" and "socialist" should "find a place, if at all, only in the Preamble"

For Secularism meaning
For socialism Meaning

Caseโ€” Balram Singh v. Union of India, Citation : 2024 LiveLaw (SC) 917

Credits- Abhishek Pandey
@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ‘2
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
S. 306 IPC | Simple Refusal To Marry Not Abetment To Suicide : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/s-306-ipc-simple-refusal-to-marry-not-abetment-to-suicide-supreme-court-276771
โ€œwe find that the accused-appellant had simply refused to marry the deceased and thus, even assuming there was love between the parties, it is only a case of broken relationship which by itself would not amount to abetment to suicide. The accused-appellant had not provoked the deceased in any manner to kill herself; rather the deceased herself carried poison in a bottle from her village while going to Kakati, Karnataka with a predetermined mind to positively get an affirmation from the accused-appellant to marry her, failing which she would commit suicide. Therefore, in such a situation simply because the accused-appellant refused to marry her, would not be a case of instigating, inciting or provoking the deceased to commit suicide.โ€, the judgment authored by Justice Mithal said.
โ€œEven assuming, though there is no evidence that the accused-appellant promised to marry the deceased, that there was such a promise, it is again a simple case of a broken relationship for which there is a different cause of action, but not prosecution or conviction for an offence under Section 306, specially in the facts and circumstances of the case where no guilty intention or mens rea on the part of the accused-appellant had been established.โ€, the court held.

KAMARUDDIN DASTAGIR SANADI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA 2024

Common query/fear of a Men/women in a relationship.(GF/BF ๐Ÿ™‚)

@CurrentLegalGK
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘Œ1
๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ
Now that Socialism Secularism is in limelight.

3 Fundamental Questions that can be askedโ€” Try to Answer them here itself

1. Why Fundamental Duties were not added in the original Constitution.

2. Illustrate the difference between Unity and Integrity words in preamble.

3. Can parliament remove any Key word from preamble
?

#Question@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿคฃ2
*เคฎเคนเคพเคฐเคพเคทเฅเคŸเฅเคฐ เค•เคพเค‚เค—เฅเคฐเฅ‡เคธ MLC เคฌเฅ‹เคฒเฅ‡- เคšเฅเคจเคพเคต เค†เคฏเฅ‹เค— เค•เฅเคคเฅเคคเฅ‡ เคœเฅˆเคธเคพ:* PM เค†เคตเคพเคธ เค•เฅ‡ เคฌเคพเคนเคฐ เคฌเฅˆเค เคพ เคฐเคนเคคเคพ เคนเฅˆ; เคญเคพเคœเคชเคพ เคจเฅ‡ EC เค”เคฐ เคชเฅเคฒเคฟเคธ เคธเฅ‡ เคถเคฟเค•เคพเคฏเคค เค•เฅ€
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/WbjM1V1mWOb
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ˜ˆ1
๐Ÿ…ฐ๏ธ 15 Names of the Women members in constituent assembly


These are All 15 Namesโ€”
1. Amrit Kaur
2. Begum Aizaz Rasul
3. Durgabai Deshmukh
4. Hansa Mehta
5. Sarojini Naidu
6. Renuka Ray
7. Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit
8. Dakshayani Velayudhan
9. Kamla Chaudhry
10. Leela Roy
11. Malati Choudhury
12. Purnima Banerjee
13. Ammu swaminathan
14. Annie Mascarene
15. Sucheta Kripalani


Can you make a good Acronym using these namesโ“

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘4
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Explained: Australiaโ€™s law banning social media for children under 16, its criticisms ๐Ÿ”— #australia #explained_global #express_explained #social_media
Should there be any age restriction in Social Media use?

Answerโ€” Of course Yes but not Absolute

Reasoningโ€”
American psychologist Jonathan Haidt, in his best-selling 2024 book The Anxious Generation, said smartphones and the Internet have replaced the โ€œplayโ€ element of childhood.

He said, โ€œWeโ€™ve had a play-based childhood for literally 200 million years because weโ€™re mammals and all mammals play. Thatโ€™s how we wired up our brains. Somewhere in the 1990s, it stoppedโ€”and stopped dead by 2010. It faded away and was replaced, very suddenly, by the phone-based childhoodโ€ฆ If you went through puberty on a smartphone with a front-facing camera and Instagram and social media, and five hours a day of social media, nine hours a day of screen time, you are at much, much higher risk of being anxious and depressed.โ€

Blanket Ban should not be implementedโ€”
โ€œThe community and platforms are in the dark about what exactly is required of them,โ€ she said. Activists also pointed to social media providing a sense of community to young people, particularly those from vulnerable backgrounds, facing bullying, belonging to the LGBTQ community, etc. A blanket ban could, in turn, prove detrimental to their well-being.

Difficulty in determining Ageโ€”
How? Aadhaar card in India? Privacy? or just take usual false information as done by social media platforms?
@CurrentLegalGK
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿคฉ1๐Ÿ‘Œ1