๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
Previously in November 1948, Professor KT Shah had moved an amendment to Article 1(1) of the Constitution. Shah had suggested that "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Secular, Federalist, Socialist Union of States".

HV Kamath presciently saying that the words "secular" and "socialist" should "find a place, if at all, only in the Preamble"

For Secularism meaning
For socialism Meaning

Caseโ€” Balram Singh v. Union of India, Citation : 2024 LiveLaw (SC) 917

Credits- Abhishek Pandey
@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ‘2
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
S. 306 IPC | Simple Refusal To Marry Not Abetment To Suicide : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/s-306-ipc-simple-refusal-to-marry-not-abetment-to-suicide-supreme-court-276771
โ€œwe find that the accused-appellant had simply refused to marry the deceased and thus, even assuming there was love between the parties, it is only a case of broken relationship which by itself would not amount to abetment to suicide. The accused-appellant had not provoked the deceased in any manner to kill herself; rather the deceased herself carried poison in a bottle from her village while going to Kakati, Karnataka with a predetermined mind to positively get an affirmation from the accused-appellant to marry her, failing which she would commit suicide. Therefore, in such a situation simply because the accused-appellant refused to marry her, would not be a case of instigating, inciting or provoking the deceased to commit suicide.โ€, the judgment authored by Justice Mithal said.
โ€œEven assuming, though there is no evidence that the accused-appellant promised to marry the deceased, that there was such a promise, it is again a simple case of a broken relationship for which there is a different cause of action, but not prosecution or conviction for an offence under Section 306, specially in the facts and circumstances of the case where no guilty intention or mens rea on the part of the accused-appellant had been established.โ€, the court held.

KAMARUDDIN DASTAGIR SANADI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA 2024

Common query/fear of a Men/women in a relationship.(GF/BF ๐Ÿ™‚)

@CurrentLegalGK
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘Œ1
๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ
Now that Socialism Secularism is in limelight.

3 Fundamental Questions that can be askedโ€” Try to Answer them here itself

1. Why Fundamental Duties were not added in the original Constitution.

2. Illustrate the difference between Unity and Integrity words in preamble.

3. Can parliament remove any Key word from preamble
?

#Question@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿคฃ2
*เคฎเคนเคพเคฐเคพเคทเฅเคŸเฅเคฐ เค•เคพเค‚เค—เฅเคฐเฅ‡เคธ MLC เคฌเฅ‹เคฒเฅ‡- เคšเฅเคจเคพเคต เค†เคฏเฅ‹เค— เค•เฅเคคเฅเคคเฅ‡ เคœเฅˆเคธเคพ:* PM เค†เคตเคพเคธ เค•เฅ‡ เคฌเคพเคนเคฐ เคฌเฅˆเค เคพ เคฐเคนเคคเคพ เคนเฅˆ; เคญเคพเคœเคชเคพ เคจเฅ‡ EC เค”เคฐ เคชเฅเคฒเคฟเคธ เคธเฅ‡ เคถเคฟเค•เคพเคฏเคค เค•เฅ€
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/WbjM1V1mWOb
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ˜ˆ1