๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Born Christian Can't Invoke Doctrine Of Caste Eclipse For Revival Of Caste Claiming Reconversion As Hindu : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/born-christian-cant-invoke-doctrine-of-caste-eclipse-for-revival-of-caste-claiming-reconversion-asโ€ฆ
Doctrine of caste eclipse

It applies only when a person practising caste-based religion converts to caste-less religion.

In such cases, their original caste is considered to remain eclipsed.

However, if the such persons reconverts to their original religion during their lifetime, the eclipse is lifted, and the caste status is automatically restored.

This however will not apply to a born Christian.

In S. Rajagopal v. C.M. Armugam (1968), it was noted that Christianity does not recognize caste distinctions, treating all followers as equals. Globally, Christianity rejects caste-based discrimination or division. The court held that when a person converts from Hinduism to Christianity, their caste under Hinduism remains in eclipse and can be restored upon reconversion to Hinduism, provided they are accepted by their caste community. However, this restoration is not possible for someone born a Christian who later converts to Hinduism.


Kailash Sonkar v. Maya Devi ((1984)
However, where it appears that the person reconverted to the old religion had been converted to Christianity since several generations, it may be difficult to apply the doctrine of eclipse to the revival of caste.'

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ‘2โค1
Previously in November 1948, Professor KT Shah had moved an amendment to Article 1(1) of the Constitution. Shah had suggested that "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Secular, Federalist, Socialist Union of States".

HV Kamath presciently saying that the words "secular" and "socialist" should "find a place, if at all, only in the Preamble"

For Secularism meaning
For socialism Meaning

Caseโ€” Balram Singh v. Union of India, Citation : 2024 LiveLaw (SC) 917

Credits- Abhishek Pandey
@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ‘2
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
S. 306 IPC | Simple Refusal To Marry Not Abetment To Suicide : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/s-306-ipc-simple-refusal-to-marry-not-abetment-to-suicide-supreme-court-276771
โ€œwe find that the accused-appellant had simply refused to marry the deceased and thus, even assuming there was love between the parties, it is only a case of broken relationship which by itself would not amount to abetment to suicide. The accused-appellant had not provoked the deceased in any manner to kill herself; rather the deceased herself carried poison in a bottle from her village while going to Kakati, Karnataka with a predetermined mind to positively get an affirmation from the accused-appellant to marry her, failing which she would commit suicide. Therefore, in such a situation simply because the accused-appellant refused to marry her, would not be a case of instigating, inciting or provoking the deceased to commit suicide.โ€, the judgment authored by Justice Mithal said.
โ€œEven assuming, though there is no evidence that the accused-appellant promised to marry the deceased, that there was such a promise, it is again a simple case of a broken relationship for which there is a different cause of action, but not prosecution or conviction for an offence under Section 306, specially in the facts and circumstances of the case where no guilty intention or mens rea on the part of the accused-appellant had been established.โ€, the court held.

KAMARUDDIN DASTAGIR SANADI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA 2024

Common query/fear of a Men/women in a relationship.(GF/BF ๐Ÿ™‚)

@CurrentLegalGK
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘Œ1
๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ
Now that Socialism Secularism is in limelight.

3 Fundamental Questions that can be askedโ€” Try to Answer them here itself

1. Why Fundamental Duties were not added in the original Constitution.

2. Illustrate the difference between Unity and Integrity words in preamble.

3. Can parliament remove any Key word from preamble
?

#Question@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿคฃ2
*เคฎเคนเคพเคฐเคพเคทเฅเคŸเฅเคฐ เค•เคพเค‚เค—เฅเคฐเฅ‡เคธ MLC เคฌเฅ‹เคฒเฅ‡- เคšเฅเคจเคพเคต เค†เคฏเฅ‹เค— เค•เฅเคคเฅเคคเฅ‡ เคœเฅˆเคธเคพ:* PM เค†เคตเคพเคธ เค•เฅ‡ เคฌเคพเคนเคฐ เคฌเฅˆเค เคพ เคฐเคนเคคเคพ เคนเฅˆ; เคญเคพเคœเคชเคพ เคจเฅ‡ EC เค”เคฐ เคชเฅเคฒเคฟเคธ เคธเฅ‡ เคถเคฟเค•เคพเคฏเคค เค•เฅ€
https://dainik.bhaskar.com/WbjM1V1mWOb
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ˜ˆ1