๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
๐Ÿฅณ Happy Birthday, Constitution of India! ๐ŸŽ‰
Technical Legal Age- 75 Years but Actual Age- The Age of Indian civilisation (spirit comes from here)

Born as a prodigy, you have faced many challenges, yet you emerged as the most comprehensive constitution in the world. On paper, you deserve a salute, but the real tribute lies in how we uphold the principles you embody in our hearts and minds.

As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, once said:

โ€œโ€ฆhowever good a Constitution may be, it is sure to turn out bad because those who are called to work it, happen to be a bad lot. However bad a Constitution may be, it may turn out to be good if those who are called to work it, happen to be a good lot.โ€

May we always strive to be the good lot, ensuring that our ideals live on
.

Original Copy of Constitution โ€”

Importance of Graphics in constituionโ€”

๏ปฟ

#Quote_@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿซก5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ‘Œ2โœ1
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Happy Constitution Day!

๐Ÿ“– Today marks 75 years since the Constitution of India was adopted.

๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€โš– To commemorate the day, we recall a historic conference in 1948. Federal and High Court judges from across the country gathered in Delhi to discuss issues concerning the judiciary in the work-in-progress Constitution: https://bit.ly/4eKIwkC

๐Ÿ“œ Weโ€™ve also launched a special series to commemorate 75 years of the Supreme Court. The series has articles about the Court's history and essays that analyse its impact on public life.

๐Ÿ“– From the inaugural speech by the first Chief Justice of India H. J. Kaniโ€™s to an overview of India's death penalty jurisprudence, we have it all:
https://www.scobserver.in/75-years-of-the-supreme-court/
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘Œ1
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Happy Constitution Day! ๐Ÿ“– Today marks 75 years since the Constitution of India was adopted. ๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€โš– To commemorate the day, we recall a historic conference in 1948. Federal and High Court judges from across the country gathered in Delhi to discuss issuesโ€ฆ
1. PN Bhagwati the sole dissenting judge in Bachhan singh case gave 2 para judgment and thereafter took 2 years to pen down the reasoning.

a. Errors of criminal justice system can take away innocents life as it is irrevocable
b. No goal of punishment mere revenge, no one can lredict whether that ceiminal cannot be reformed.
c. Entire process of being condemned to death, awaiting execution and the final act of execution involves intense mental and physical suffering, which cannot be constitutionally imposed. 


In its 262nd Report published in 2015, the Law Commission of India concluded that the death penalty neither acts as an effective deterrent nor is it justified as a form of retributive revenge.

Every judge has own notion of rarest of rare (sentencing principles again) in an interview of judges one said If I think it is rare I will show many reasons for it being rare.

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿคฃ1
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Is Not The Magistrate A Prisoner Of Section 175 (3) Read With Section 173 (4) Of BNSS? https://www.livelaw.in/articles/magistrate-power-to-order-investigation-section-156-crpc-vs-section-175-bnss-comparative-analysis-275948
Complaint Case changes in BNSS

Object Behind 190
โ€œThe object (of Section 190 Cr.P.C.) is to ensure the safety of a citizen against the vagaries of the Police by giving him the right to approach the Magistrates 
directly if the Police does not take action or he has reason to believe that no such action will be taken by the Police.โ€

1. Earlier there were 2 ways of setting criminal law into motion by giving information by way of FIR to SHO or by complaint to magistrate.

2. Both were independent ways.

3. Magistrate in case of 'cognizable offence' could forward the complaint to SHO (instead of 202) w/o taking cognizance. R. R. Chari v. State of U.P. AIR 1951), 3 judge

4. Changes in BNSS
Now Directly a person cannot approach magistrate, he must first approach SHO 173(1) {FIR} ----> then if failed S.P. 173(4) ----> then if he fails go to magistrate.
[Person cannot straightaway seek from the Magistrate an order for investigation by the Police]

5. Magistrate then has to do the following before ordering investigationโ€”
a. Peruse the application given to S.P. and supported by affidavit
b. Made an inquiry
c. Consider the submissions made by police officer.

๐Ÿค” Question Can now Magistrate on suo motu powers order the investigation?

โœ“ Not answered but earlier the law wasโ€”
Priyanka Srivastava v. State of U.P. AIR 2015
insisted on an affidavit by the party seeking from the Magistrate an order for police investigation. Even without any such affidavit the Magistrate could suo motu order police investigation under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C.

However currently there is no clarity.

My Questions from you all.
1. Can magistrate order investigation under non cognizable offences in 156(3)/175(3)

2. Without going to Police station for cognizable offence can you approach magistrate?

3. How magistrate in practical scenerio does inquiry as mentioned above or an inquiry under section 202

๐Ÿ“‘ Homeworkโ€”
Read 156 CrPC and 175 BNSS carefully and take out essentials of new law.

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ‘Œ2
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Born Christian Can't Invoke Doctrine Of Caste Eclipse For Revival Of Caste Claiming Reconversion As Hindu : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/born-christian-cant-invoke-doctrine-of-caste-eclipse-for-revival-of-caste-claiming-reconversion-asโ€ฆ
Doctrine of caste eclipse

It applies only when a person practising caste-based religion converts to caste-less religion.

In such cases, their original caste is considered to remain eclipsed.

However, if the such persons reconverts to their original religion during their lifetime, the eclipse is lifted, and the caste status is automatically restored.

This however will not apply to a born Christian.

In S. Rajagopal v. C.M. Armugam (1968), it was noted that Christianity does not recognize caste distinctions, treating all followers as equals. Globally, Christianity rejects caste-based discrimination or division. The court held that when a person converts from Hinduism to Christianity, their caste under Hinduism remains in eclipse and can be restored upon reconversion to Hinduism, provided they are accepted by their caste community. However, this restoration is not possible for someone born a Christian who later converts to Hinduism.


Kailash Sonkar v. Maya Devi ((1984)
However, where it appears that the person reconverted to the old religion had been converted to Christianity since several generations, it may be difficult to apply the doctrine of eclipse to the revival of caste.'

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ‘2โค1