๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
๐Ÿ“ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿš”
If Any Police Station Left Outside Coverage Area Of CCTV Camera, Such Lapse Shall Be Considered As Contempt Of Court (S.P. and SHO liable) Madhya Pradesh HC


{Akhilesh Pandey v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh, 2024}


๐ŸŒŸ Landmark judgments on CCTV in police stations

1. D. K. Basu v. West Bengal, 2015
The State Governments shall also consider installation of CCTV cameras in police stations in a phased manner depending upon the incidents of human rights violation reported in such stations.

2. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, 2018
CCTV to be installed in every police station and videography in investigation.

3. Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh, 2021
various directions issued to implement CCTV installation.

{Both 2 and 3 dealt with oversight committee to study and make reports on cctv footage}

โ“ Questionโ€”
A police officer pleads defence on encounter killing saying that order of superior officer is binding on us.

๐Ÿ…ฐ๏ธnswer-
Prakash Kadam v. Ramprasad Vishwanath Gupta, 2011
We warn policemen that they will not be excused for committing murder in the name of โ€œencounterโ€ on the pretext that they were carrying out the orders of their superior officers or politicians, however high. In the Nuremburg trials the Nazi war criminals took the plea that โ€œorders are ordersโ€ nevertheless they were hanged. If a policeman is given an illegal order by any superior to do a fake โ€œencounterโ€, it is his duty to refuse to carry out such illegal order, otherwise he will be charged for murder, and if found guilty sentenced to death.

Ancient Indian Legal #History@CurrentLegalGK

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ Matsanyaya (Mahabharata, Kautilya, Shatapatha Brahmana)
(Big fish eating small)

โœ“ Kautilya- โ€œif danda be not employed, it gives rise to the condition of matsyanyaya, since in the absence of a chastiser the strong devour the weakโ€. That in the absence of a king (arajaka) or when there is no fear of punishment then condition of matsyanyaya follows.

โœ“ Shantiparva of Mahabharata Bhisma Pitamah tells Yudhishthir that there is nothing worse in the world than lawlessness, for in a state of matsyanyaya, nobody, not even the evil doers are safe, because even the evil doers will sooner or later be swallowed up by other evil doers.

โš”๏ธ Sentencing and Punishment theory to Police officials.
Yashwant v. State of Maharashtra, 2018
wherein this Court laid down that when the police is violator of the law whose primary responsibility is to protect the law, the punishment for such violation has to be proportionately stringent so as to have effective deterrent effect and instil confidence in the society.


@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘9โšก1โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Judge-To-Population Was Ordered To Be Made 50 Per Million By 2007, But Not Even 25 Per Million In 2024 : Supreme Court Laments https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/judge-to-population-was-ordered-to-be-made-50-per-million-by-2007-but-not-even-25-per-millionโ€ฆ
The Court recalled that in 2002, a direction was passed in the All India Judges Association case that by 2007, judge to population ratio in the trial judiciary should be 50 per million. However, even in 2024, this ratio is not even 25 per million.

These observations while expunging certain adverse remarks made by the Delhi High Court against a Sessions Judge. The Court held that personal criticism of judicial officers should be avoided while setting aside the orders.

In the judgment which called for judicial restraint while making remarks against the personal conduct of judges, the Court reminded that even the judges of higher courts are vulnerable to making mistakes.

The judgment also referred to the immense stress faced by judges due to the huge workload, which makes them prone to make errors.



#Judicial_reforms and impact of not making reforms, not complying with infrastructure demands can defeat justice.

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿคฃ2
#Quote_@CurrentLegalGK

We may consider each generation as a separate nation, with a right, by the will of the majority, to bind themselves, but none to bind the succeeding generation, more than
the inhabitants of another country
.

~ Thomas Jefferson

Living document, progressive interpretation of constitution
๐Ÿ‘7โค3๐Ÿ˜1
Bulldozer Judgment .pdf
542.1 KB
๐ŸŒŸ Bulldozer Justice
II. RULE OF LAW
III SEPARATION OF POWERS
IV. DOCTRINE OF PUBLIC TRUST AND PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
V. RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED UNDER THE CONSTITUTION
VI. PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW: PRESUMPTION OF
INNOCENCE AND NATURAL Justice
VII. RIGHT TO SHELTER P
VIII. PERMISSIBILITY OF THE COLLECTIVE PUNISHMENT
IX. DIRECTIONS


๐Ÿ’ฏ Case: Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures, 2024

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ˜1
For those who remove plagiarism using Quillbot to get their articles published: I used to do this often as well and ended up publishing some poorly written articles ๐Ÿ™‚.
๐Ÿ‘6โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3
๐ŸŒŸ Provisions relating to Secularism

The Court in its order observed that at the time of adoption of the Constitution in 1949, the term Secular was not objectively defined.
Yet, the original tenets as enshrined in the preamble of  "equality of status and opportunity; fraternity, ensuring individual dignityโ€”read alongside justice - social, economic political, and liberty; of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship, reflect this secular ethos."
  

The essence of Secularism can also be seen in the fundamental rights of the Constitution under Articles 14, 15 and 16 - "which prohibit discrimination against citizens on religious grounds while guaranteeing equal protection of laws and equal opportunity in public employment." 

Preamble other objectives other than secularism read together, Articles 14, 15, 16, 25, 26, 29, 30 and 44.


@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿคฃ2โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ™1๐ŸŒš1