𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
831 photos
11 videos
1.64K files
2.94K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

πŸ‘¨β€βš– Filtered Information Brings Clarity.

🌐THE BEST FROM ALL LEGAL UPDATES BY EOD.

"Finding Quintessence of all possible POVs of provisions and Precedents
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
"Bulldozer justice is simply unacceptable under the rule of law. If it were to be permitted the constitutional recognition of the right to property under Article 300A would be reduced to a dead letter,"

Re Manoj Tibrewal Akash, 2024
🀣6❀‍πŸ”₯5πŸ‘5😒1🀩1πŸ’―1πŸ†1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
First Sale Doctrine: Addressing Infringement By Tampering of Trademarks https://www.livelaw.in/law-firms/law-firm-articles-/trade-mark-first-sale-proprietor-ipr-right-to-health-wipo-patanjali-ayurved-delhi-high-court-ss-rana-co-274697
πŸ’°πŸͺ™ Doctrine of 1st Sale under Trademark Act

Section 30(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, establishes an important facet of trademark law and that is - when someone lawfully acquires goods bearing a registered trademark, any subsequent sale or dealing with those goods, whether by that individual or another person acting through them, does not constitute trademark infringement.

However

Section 30(4) clarifies that this protection does not apply if there are legitimate reasons for the trademark owner to restrict further sales, particularly if the goods' condition has been altered or impaired after their initial sale
.

#IPR
@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘2
🌟 #Question

A signs a contract with B (painter) that you can paint my home I will give you money, now A gave advance money and B who is painter wants to paint the home but is not allowing him.

Is this a breach of Contract?

@CurrentLegalGK