Forwarded from Keshava
Ques: If a investigating police officer who was suspended for few definate days, he then goes on investigating case himself and finds certain important clues/leads so what would be the status of that lead,would it be considered official or what.
Constitution Bench Judgments Of Justice DY Chandrachud
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/constitution-bench-judgments-of-justice-dy-chandrachud-274755
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/constitution-bench-judgments-of-justice-dy-chandrachud-274755
www.livelaw.in
Constitution Bench Judgments Of Justice DY Chandrachud
The Chief Justice of India Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court on May 13, 2016, and continued until November 7, 2022. He became the 50th CJI on November 8, 2022, and...
"Bulldozer justice is simply unacceptable under the rule of law. If it were to be permitted the constitutional recognition of the right to property under Article 300A would be reduced to a dead letter,"
Re Manoj Tibrewal Akash, 2024
Re Manoj Tibrewal Akash, 2024
π€£6β€βπ₯5π5π’1π€©1π―1π1
Justice DY Chandrachud's Judgments On Socio-Economic Justice, Gender Equality, Reproductive Rights, Child Welfare & Disability Rights
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/justice-dy-chandrachuds-judgments-on-socio-economic-justice-gender-equality-reproductive-rights-child-welfare-disability-rights-274783
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/justice-dy-chandrachuds-judgments-on-socio-economic-justice-gender-equality-reproductive-rights-child-welfare-disability-rights-274783
www.livelaw.in
Justice DY Chandrachud's Judgments On Socio-Economic Justice, Gender Equality, Reproductive Rights, Child Welfare & Disabilityβ¦
Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, who is set to demit office on November 10, was involved in some of the most significant judgments during his tenure as a judge. Some of his notable...
π2
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) And Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Monthly Digestβ October 2024
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/latest-bns-and-bnss-judgments-digest-october-2024-274733
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/latest-bns-and-bnss-judgments-digest-october-2024-274733
www.livelaw.in
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) And Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Monthly Digestβ October 2024
Allahabad High Court:
β€βπ₯6π2β€1
First Sale Doctrine: Addressing Infringement By Tampering of Trademarks
https://www.livelaw.in/law-firms/law-firm-articles-/trade-mark-first-sale-proprietor-ipr-right-to-health-wipo-patanjali-ayurved-delhi-high-court-ss-rana-co-274697
https://www.livelaw.in/law-firms/law-firm-articles-/trade-mark-first-sale-proprietor-ipr-right-to-health-wipo-patanjali-ayurved-delhi-high-court-ss-rana-co-274697
www.livelaw.in
First Sale Doctrine: Addressing Infringement By Tampering of Trademarks
A trade mark is a mark which is used in the context of goods as well as services for the reason of showing a relation in the field of trade between the goods or services and any person possessing...
π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
First Sale Doctrine: Addressing Infringement By Tampering of Trademarks https://www.livelaw.in/law-firms/law-firm-articles-/trade-mark-first-sale-proprietor-ipr-right-to-health-wipo-patanjali-ayurved-delhi-high-court-ss-rana-co-274697
π°πͺ
Section 30(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, establishes an important facet of trademark law and that is - when someone lawfully acquires goods bearing a registered trademark, any subsequent sale or dealing with those goods, whether by that individual or another person acting through them, does not constitute trademark infringement.
However
Section 30(4) clarifies that this protection does not apply if there are legitimate reasons for the trademark owner to restrict further sales, particularly if the goods' condition has been altered or impaired after their initial sale.
#IPR
@CurrentLegalGK
Doctrine of 1st Sale under Trademark ActSection 30(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, establishes an important facet of trademark law and that is - when someone lawfully acquires goods bearing a registered trademark, any subsequent sale or dealing with those goods, whether by that individual or another person acting through them, does not constitute trademark infringement.
However
Section 30(4) clarifies that this protection does not apply if there are legitimate reasons for the trademark owner to restrict further sales, particularly if the goods' condition has been altered or impaired after their initial sale.
#IPR
@CurrentLegalGK
π2