𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
831 photos
11 videos
1.64K files
2.94K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

πŸ‘¨β€βš– Filtered Information Brings Clarity.

🌐THE BEST FROM ALL LEGAL UPDATES BY EOD.

"Finding Quintessence of all possible POVs of provisions and Precedents
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
No Data Produced To Show Road Accidents Increase Due To LMV License Holders Driving Light Transport Vehicles : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/no-data-produced-to-show-road-accidents-increase-due-to-lmv-license-holders-driving-light-transport…
πŸš—πŸš Motor vehicle act judgment

βœ“ The Purpose of MV Act
βœ“ Brief Overview of Act and Rules.
βœ“ Construing Section 2(21),3 & 10.
βœ“ Whether the interpretation in Mukund Dewangan(2017) renders most provisions of the MV Act & MV Rules otiose?
(a) Harmonious Construction
(b) Interpretation must not lead to impractical outcomes.

βœ“ Discussion on the 8 Conflicting judgments
βœ“ Is Mukund Dewangan(2017) per incuriam
?

Important for #IOS as wel ass doctrine of staire decisis as well


M/S. BAJAJ ALLIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. v. RAMBHA DEVI
Citation : 2024 LiveLaw (SC) 859


@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘4❀‍πŸ”₯1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ‘©β€πŸ’»πŸš“ Digital Arrest wale ka time waste kardiya πŸ˜‚

This is a serious issue please be aware and also do some research on this topic.

See their Bollywoodish acting of Police πŸ˜‚


@CurrentLegalGK
🀣7πŸ‘2
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Supreme Court Refuses To Reconsider Judgment Which Brought Doctors Under Consumer Protection Act, Says Reference Was Unnecessary https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-refuses-to-reconsider-judgment-which-brought-doctors-under-consumer-protection…
🌟 One reason Why Medical professional comes under section 2(42) of Consumer protection Act, 2019 [Definition of service]

Dharangadhara Chemical Works Ltd. v. State of Saurashtra, 1957
A contract for services' implies a contract whereby one party undertakes to render services e.g. professional or technical services, to or for another in the performance of which he is not subject to detailed direction and control but exercises professional or technical skill and uses his own knowledge and discretion. [See : Oxford Companion to Law, P. 1134].

A
contract of service' implies relationship of master and servant and involves an obligation to obey orders in the work to be performed and as to its mode and manner of performance. [See : Stroud's Judicial Dictionary, 5th Edn., P. 540; Simmons v. Heath Laundry Co. (1910)
and Dharangadhara Chemical Works (supra)

🌟 For point wise difference see-

Contract 'of' Personal Service is excluded in service definition [2(42)]

Doctor and patient relationship can be based on mutual trust but not like master and servant thereby it is not OF but FOR.

Now the court has rejected the reference to reconsider the Indian Medical Association vs V.P. Shantha, 1995 case as it was irrelevant because court had decided lawyers case on its own merit w/o considering this case, this 1995 case can be reconsidered in future if factual foundation warrants so.
ο»Ώ
@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘2❀1πŸ‘Œ1😍1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
The large and small of it: the Supreme Court on bench sizes - Supreme Court Observer https://www.scobserver.in/journal/the-large-and-small-of-it-the-supreme-court-on-bench-sizes/ #Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK
🌟How reference to larger bench is given to avoid breach of doctrine of staire decisis

βœ“ Precedent used- Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community vs. State of Maharashtra, (2005) also see exception of this in this case itself.

πŸ“™ For Detailed Critical discussion-
After 2 Recent dissents by Bela M trivedi (sub classification case) and BV nagarathana (Mineral development case)
on reasons to be provided by smaller bench when referring (
read more)

πŸ–ΌοΈ Image fromβ€”
Sita Soren v. Union of India, 2023

🌟 Doctrinesβ€”
(i) doctrine of predictability;
(ii) doctrine of finality;
(iii) principle of judicial propriety; and
(iv) doctrine of stare decisis.
see AMU minority institution justice surya kant judgment


#Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘1πŸ’―1