S.319 CrPC | Order To Summon Additional Accused Passed After Acquittal/Conviction Of Co-Accused Is Unsustainable: Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/s319-crpc-order-to-summon-additional-accused-passed-after-acquittalconviction-of-co-accused-is-unsustainable-supreme-court-269348

Why Tamil Nadu opposes Centre’s New Education Policy (NEP) 🔗
#dharmendra_pradhan #explained_politics #express_explained #m_k_stalin #new_education_policy #tamil_nadu

Why Rahul Gandhi’s meeting with US Congresswoman Ilhan Omar has triggered outrage 🔗
#express_explained #minnesota #rahul_gandhi

Why September 12 is observed as Saragarhi Day 🔗
#express_explained #history #punjab

Does Polaris Dawn mission violate 50-year old international treaty? 🔗
#explained_sci_tech #express_explained #spacex

🌟 These are some General Awareness Articles.

Skim them for once.

Rahul Gandhi One is Political news but Important for us to know in general about his ideology as he is the keader of opposition (counterpart of PM)

@CurrentLegalGK

🌟 Strategy to Get 90% Accuracy in Translation paper

Black's law dictionary
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3059

practice here
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4280

legal glossary

@CurrentLegalGK

🌟 Doctrine of Chilling Effect under Article 19(1)(a) Feedom of speech and expression lucidly Explained

https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9gNrwJf05bMBIllR25/121

@CurrentLegalGK

🌟 Right of Silence | A Comprehensive overview from Constitution to CrPC and Doctrine of Missing link.

⚡ Selvi v. State of Karnataka
A conjunctive reading of
✓Article 20(3)
✓Sections 161(2),
✓313(3) and
✓Proviso (b) of Section 315(1) CrPC.

The gist of this position is that even though an accused is a competent witness in his/her own trial, he/she cannot be compelled to answer questions that could expose him/her to incrimination and the trial Judge cannot draw adverse inferences from the refusal to do so. This position is cemented by prohibiting any of the parties from commenting on the failure of the accused to give evidence

@CurrentLegalGK

🤫📓 Doctrine of Silence (When constitution is expressly silent on a point of law) Read with Doctrine of Progressive interpretation and Emanation.


🌟 Brief of Doctrine
The Doctrine of Silence highlights how a constitution's unspoken or unwritten aspects are just as important as its explicit provisions.

Constitutional silence can reveal latent principles. Where the Constitution is silent, courts often infer rights or limitations through interpretation, filling gaps that the framers may have left open. For eg Doctrine of Basic Structure, despite no explicit mention of it. Similarly, Griswold v Connecticut 1965 case in USA saw Supreme Court infer right to privacy from various amendments, despite privacy not being explicitly mentioned in Constitution

The article distinguishes between door-closing silences (imply prohibition) and door-opening silences (open avenues for interpretation) Interplay between what is said and unsaid allows for judicial creativity.

R/W-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2989

@CurrentLegalGK

🌄 #Quote

‘You must not use a steam 
hammer to crack a nut, 
if a nutcracker would
do? In other words, 
proportionality is all about means and ends.

~R v. Goldsmith, [1983]
Justice Diplok

Use- Doctrine of Proportionality, Harmonious construction, test of reasonableness on balancing rights and restrictions both.


R/W-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2204?single

@CurrentLegalGK

The Welcome And Unwelcome Changes In Section 183 Of BNSS
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/comparison-between-section-183-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-and-section-164-code-of-criminal-procedure-269492

⚡ Welcome change—
The expression “Magistrate of the District” in Section 183 of BNSS is a welcome change. Section 164 Cr.P.C did not confer the right to record confessions and statements to any “Judicial Magistrate” of the district. Hence, it could even be argued that a “Judicial Magistrate” of Tamil Nadu could record the confession of an accused involved in an offence committed in New Delhi. Now such an interpretation will not be possible.

🙃 Unwelcome Change—
Any Magistrate of the District in which the information about commission of any offence has been registered.

So if the information is registered in Assam and offence committed in punjab then only assam's Magistrate can record statement or confession.

⚡ Welcome Change-
Incorporation of this judgment directions in proviso of sub section 6
State of Karnataka, Nonavinakere Police v. Shivanna @ Tarkari Shivanna, {2014 SC}

Section 164 CrPC now 183 BNSS

@CurrentLegalGK

Mission Mausam ☔⛈️

Is there any right currently on good whether conditions?
I think MK Ranjitsinh v. Union of India, 2024 perfectly fits here because of the right against the adverse effects of climate change in extreme whether situation though it is very weak due to lack of any use and territorial application of climate which is not possible has nature as no boundaries.


@CurrentLegalGK

🕉️Translate this in Hindi on the occassion of हिन्दी दिवस 😊

Send your translated version-
@LegalQuizzes

@CurrentLegalGK

🌟 History of Supreme court

@CurrentLegalGK

🌟 Article 19 Answer Booster
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9gNrwJf05bMBIllR25/122

#Question can you answer them?

Whether the restrictions of 19 and 25 can be used together?

Hint: see Article 25 for both (subject to...)

Whether we have a hierarchy of fundamental rights that this is superior to that?

@CurrentLegalGK

What are the Commons and why is community leadership needed to govern them? 🔗
#express_explained

Case briefs on SC ST atrocities act.

Landmark Judgments

@CurrentLegalGK