๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
831 photos
11 videos
1.65K files
2.94K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš– Filtered Information Brings Clarity.

๐ŸŒTHE BEST FROM ALL LEGAL UPDATES BY EOD.

"Finding Quintessence of all possible POVs of provisions and Precedents
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
๐Ÿ‘ซ ๐Ÿ˜‡ Happy Rakshabandhan Everyone

Remember the Pledge of school time and the word Fraternity in Preamble always.

The relation which can outstand many and a boost to gender equality


@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘10๐Ÿ™5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ˜‡1
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
'What Is The Main Purpose Of Section 27 Of The Evidence Act? ' https://www.livelaw.in/articles/confessions-admissibility-and-section-27-indian-evidence-act-267072
๐Ÿ”ช๐Ÿ”Ž Purpose of Section 27 IEA/ proviso to section 23 BSA

๐Ÿ”ฎ Myth busted- To lift ban on 25/26 IEA

The essential purpose of Section 27 of the Evidence Act is not to render admissible a โ€œconfessionโ€ in the โ€œdisclosure statementโ€ made by an accused to a Police Officer.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ Case- Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor AIR 1947

If in a โ€œdisclosure statementโ€ there is a โ€œconfession" such a โ€œconfessionโ€ is inadmissible

๐Ÿ’ฏ Result- If the inculpatory part of the โ€œdisclosure statementโ€ is so excluded, then what remains is a mere statement to P.O.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Consequence of Statement-
Will not hit the Ban Under section 162(1) Cr.P.C because of 162(2).

๐Ÿค” What is โ€œwhether it amounts to a confession or notโ€

If confession is excluded then why this language โ˜๏ธ

โœ… Answer- Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor AIR 1947

1. Disclosure statement does not constitute gist of offence only a corroborative piece of evidence other need to be proved.

2. BUT if possessionโ€ or โ€œconcealmentโ€ of the incriminating object itself constitutes the gist of the offence disclosure statementโ€ would be admissible notwithstanding the fact that statement amounts to a โ€œconfessionโ€

๐Ÿ“’ Laws in which when Section 27 Statement amounts to Confession

1. Opium Act, 1978,
2. Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940,
3. Explosives Act, 1884,
4. Explosive Substances Act, 1908,
5. Public Gambling Act, 1867,
6. Gold Control Act, 1968, 7. Narcotic Drugs Act and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

๐ŸŽฌ Illustrationโ€”
Larance says; I have killed Soloman with a Gun and the Gun is placed in the farm house.


1. Confession- Bold Highlighted part
2. Statement of S. 27- Underline.
3. Statement Amounts to confession for S. 25 Arms Act, 1959

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš–๏ธConclusion- Majority of Cases statement does not Amounts to confession but only when concealement and possesion of object itself consitutues offence then amounts to confession.

#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘13โค1๐Ÿ”ฅ1