Kerala High Court Revises Selection Rules For Civil Judge (Junior Division), Minimum Three Years Of Practise Needed To Apply
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/kerala-high-court-resolves-amend-selection-rules-civil-judge-junior-division-revises-eligibility-criteria-263963
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/kerala-high-court-resolves-amend-selection-rules-civil-judge-junior-division-revises-eligibility-criteria-263963
www.livelaw.in
Kerala High Court Resolves To Revise Selection Rules For Civil Judge (Junior Division), Minimum Three Years Of Practise Neededβ¦
In a Full Court meeting of judges, the Kerala High Court has resolved to carry out amendments in the Selection Rules for appointment to the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division), specifying a...
π€©2π―2
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Kerala High Court Revises Selection Rules For Civil Judge (Junior Division), Minimum Three Years Of Practise Needed To Apply https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/kerala-high-court-resolves-amend-selection-rules-civil-judge-junior-division-revises-eligibilityβ¦
π¨ββοΈ 1990-2005 cycle is getting repeated.Experience is required because of the practical nuances.
1. Examination process tests only theory.
2. Many Law colleges are dumb they don't allow practical internships.
Experience agar hoga to subke liye hona chahiye 70% and 3 years to intelligible differentia create nahi karta π€ (Kahan 3 years w/o income practice kaha private ke 80%)
Corruption will increase now for experience and even after they get into service also (corrupt minds will enter) Talent/deserving will lose opportunity.
Observations suo Motu kabhi bhi judges ki recruitment process me gadbadi par nahi aati, jo unke bekar exam process ke karan judges baithein hain, (examination process + corruption) unke kharab knowledge ke karan ab rules change kr rhe.
The Question is how you are going to count the experience???
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯8π4π―3
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
πππ¨ Announcement 15 August is the date of the 1st Anniversary of this Channel π§ Planning to Organise a Competition. π‘ Suggest us some good Ideas for competition π One competition is for sure is on logo making for our channel, if you think you can makeβ¦
π‘
βοΈYou will have only 2 hour to write and share in PDF form with your name on top.
π Date: The topic will be shared on 11th August and entries will get closed after 2 hour.
π Time limit Reason: To avoid UFM and only deserving candidates get the prize.
π Use: Prize + Compete with hundreds of candidates.
π Prize: MCQ Booklet πππ
Only to Top 3 candidates.
@CurrentLegalGK
Essay writing competition would be a great idea.
βοΈYou will have only 2 hour to write and share in PDF form with your name on top.
π Date: The topic will be shared on 11th August and entries will get closed after 2 hour.
π Time limit Reason: To avoid UFM and only deserving candidates get the prize.
π Use: Prize + Compete with hundreds of candidates.
π Prize
Only to Top 3 candidates.
Our Last Competition was Amazing, got so many entries for quiz making this time I hope we get triple entries bcz this is directly related to your mains practice Mock test.
@CurrentLegalGK
β€9π8β€βπ₯1π―1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π‘ Essay writing competition would be a great idea. βοΈYou will have only 2 hour to write and share in PDF form with your name on top. π
Date: The topic will be shared on 11th August and entries will get closed after 2 hour. π Time limit Reason: To avoidβ¦
ππ
Also remember we need a decent long term use logo so avoid use of AI as it is prone to errors.
All the Best π―
@CurrentLegalGK
Logo Making Competition is still on keep sending.
Also remember we need a decent long term use logo so avoid use of AI as it is prone to errors.
All the Best π―
@CurrentLegalGK
π1
π #Question
In which case the Supreme Court acknowledged that the Indian Constitution had conceived a quasi federal policy?
(a) St. of Punjab V. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.
(b) Kailash Chand V. Dharam Dass
(c) Ashok Tanwar V. St. of M.P.
(d) J. P. Bansal V. St. of Rajasthan
@CurrentLegalGK
In which case the Supreme Court acknowledged that the Indian Constitution had conceived a quasi federal policy?
(a) St. of Punjab V. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.
(b) Kailash Chand V. Dharam Dass
(c) Ashok Tanwar V. St. of M.P.
(d) J. P. Bansal V. St. of Rajasthan
@CurrentLegalGK
π3π€©2
π Artificial intelligence Essay Legal perspective is a must in every essay whether it is social or state specific (they check your mindset and at the end being legal is good)
Your Quote should always be by a thinker, scholar or jurist. I would say Indian Judges ka hai to best hai, har jagah recent Quotes MODI, Elon Musk ye sub ke avoid krna jab tak bohot suitable na ho.
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2288
Telegram
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
βοΈ Artificial Intelligence - Importance in Indian Judiciary
Basic #essay Material
More: https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2930
@CurrentLegalGK
Basic #essay Material
More: https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2930
@CurrentLegalGK
π6π₯3
ππ€
βIt is an evident position of law that a prior executive decision does not bar the state legislature from enacting a law or framing a policy contrary to or in conflict with the previous executive decision in furtherance of the larger public interest. Nor can it be argued that the law laid down by the legislature would be affected by the principles of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation because the executive had previously expressed a different view.
ο»Ώ@CurrentLegalGK
Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation / Promissory estoppel
βIt is an evident position of law that a prior executive decision does not bar the state legislature from enacting a law or framing a policy contrary to or in conflict with the previous executive decision in furtherance of the larger public interest. Nor can it be argued that the law laid down by the legislature would be affected by the principles of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation because the executive had previously expressed a different view.
The doctrine does not elevate legitimate expectation to the level of a right enforceable by law.
Doctrine of legitimate expectation does not constrain the government from altering its policies, provided the changes are made in public interest and not through an abuse of power.
ο»Ώ@CurrentLegalGK
π6π2π―2
Elderly population in India expected to double by 2050: UNFPA India chief - https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/elderly-population-in-india-expected-to-double-by-2050-unfpa-india-chief/article68428477.ece,
The Hindu
Elderly population in India expected to double by 2050: UNFPA India chief
UNFPA India chief highlights key population trends in India, emphasizing the need for investment in healthcare and housing.
π€―4π3π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’ pinned Β«π‘ Essay writing competition would be a great idea. βοΈYou will have only 2 hour to write and share in PDF form with your name on top. π
Date: The topic will be shared on 11th August and entries will get closed after 2 hour. π Time limit Reason: To avoidβ¦Β»
Nemo judex in causa sua meaning - "no man shall be a judge in his own cause was first started by ______ in Dr. Bonhams case
#constitution
#constitution
Anonymous Quiz
23%
Lord grey
43%
Lord coke
25%
Lord moulton
9%
Lord henward
π10π―3
Is Entertainment Tax Applicable To Online Cinema Ticket Booking Charges? Supreme Court To Decide
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/is-entertainment-tax-applicable-to-online-cinema-ticket-booking-charges-supreme-court-to-decide-264302
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/is-entertainment-tax-applicable-to-online-cinema-ticket-booking-charges-supreme-court-to-decide-264302
www.livelaw.in
Is Entertainment Tax Applicable To Online Cinema Ticket Booking Charges? Supreme Court To Decide
The Supreme Court is set to examine whether online ticket booking charges can be subjected to Entertainment Tax. The genesis of this stems from the order passed by the Madras High Court...
π5π₯2
ππ
No updates till 12th August that is till competition day till then see pinned messages
Sorry for the gap... Many of You are neither interested nor you should (in the reason) that's why not mentioning.
@CurrentLegalGK
Notice No updates till 12th August that is till competition day till then see pinned messages
Sorry for the gap... Many of You are neither interested nor you should (in the reason) that's why not mentioning.
We will come back with new amazing Trends and Gifts π
@CurrentLegalGK
π’29π8π«‘6π€5π¨2
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Compoundability of 498A β 85_86 BNS .pdf
π
β 482/528 v. 320/359 (CrPC/BNSS)
βPower of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences Under Section 320 of the Code.
β High Court may quash criminal proceedings pertaining to offences arising out of matrimony relating to dowry, etc. or the family disputes where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute.
π In this category of cases, High Court may quash criminal proceedings if in its viewβ
(All essentials) (crime may be non compoundable)
1. Compromise between the offender and victim,
2. Possibility of conviction is remote and bleak,
3. Continuation of the criminal case would put the accused to great oppression and prejudice.
4. Extreme injustice would be caused to him by not quashing the criminal case despite full and complete settlement and compromise with the victim.
π―Recent Updates-
1. Compounding Of Section 498A Not In Interest Of Women': Government Tells Bombay HC
2. Achin Gupta Case
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2790
β‘ Madhya Pradeshβ
07/07/2022 Gazetted order (2019 amendment act) on Compoundablity of 498A after 6 months.
@CurrentLegalGK
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, 2012 β 482/528 v. 320/359 (CrPC/BNSS)
βPower of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences Under Section 320 of the Code.
β High Court may quash criminal proceedings pertaining to offences arising out of matrimony relating to dowry, etc. or the family disputes where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute.
π In this category of cases, High Court may quash criminal proceedings if in its viewβ
(All essentials) (crime may be non compoundable)
1. Compromise between the offender and victim,
2. Possibility of conviction is remote and bleak,
3. Continuation of the criminal case would put the accused to great oppression and prejudice.
4. Extreme injustice would be caused to him by not quashing the criminal case despite full and complete settlement and compromise with the victim.
π―Recent Updates-
1. Compounding Of Section 498A Not In Interest Of Women': Government Tells Bombay HC
2. Achin Gupta Case
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2790
β‘ Madhya Pradeshβ
07/07/2022 Gazetted order (2019 amendment act) on Compoundablity of 498A after 6 months.
@CurrentLegalGK
π19π3π₯2π€©1
π°π
π Caseβ Moidutty Musliyar v Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station, 2024
β Ratio decidendiβ
1. Citizen- Section 1(2) of Act says applicable to all citizens without and beyond india as well (Citizens 1st then comes religion)
2. Savings Clause- 1875 Majority Act says above 18 persons in major but section 2 mentionsβ> Marriage, Dower, Divorce And Adoption; Religious Rites and Person Attained Majority Before 1875 Act.
βHowever Court said 2006 Act will override 1875 Act so far as child marriage is consideredβ
β Precedents Relied Uponβ
1. Independent Thought v. Union of India, 2017 (Two concurring Judgments delivered in this case)
π¨ββοΈ Justice Madan B. Lokur:
PCMA is a secular law prevails over Hindu and Muslim law.
π¨ββοΈ Justice Deepak Gupta:
The Special Act deals with children prevail over Hindu and Muslim law. (Generalia Specilibus Non Derogant)
2. Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Shaikh v. State of Gujarat, 2016
Muslim personal law would not prevail over 2006 child marriage act
3. Khaledur Rahman v. State of
Kerala, 2022
4. Mohamed Abbas M. v. Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, 2015
Provisions of Prohibition
of Child Marriage Act, 2006 are in no way against the religious rights of Muslim or any religion guaranteed under Articles 25 and 29 of the Constitution.
β DISAGREEMENT with High courtsβ (Muslim girl can marry upon reaching puberty)
1. Patna High Court-
Md. Idris v. State of Bihar and Others, 1980
2. Punjab and Haryana High Court-
Jammu v. State of Haryana, 2010
3. Delhi High Court-
Tahra Begum v. State Of Delhi, 2012
β‘Matter sub judice before Supreme court as well-
https://t.me/LegalQuizzes/304157
@CurrentLegalGK
Child Marriage and Religion Game.π Caseβ Moidutty Musliyar v Sub Inspector Vadakkencherry Police Station, 2024
β Ratio decidendiβ
1. Citizen- Section 1(2) of Act says applicable to all citizens without and beyond india as well (Citizens 1st then comes religion)
2. Savings Clause- 1875 Majority Act says above 18 persons in major but section 2 mentionsβ> Marriage, Dower, Divorce And Adoption; Religious Rites and Person Attained Majority Before 1875 Act.
βHowever Court said 2006 Act will override 1875 Act so far as child marriage is consideredβ
β Precedents Relied Uponβ
1. Independent Thought v. Union of India, 2017 (Two concurring Judgments delivered in this case)
π¨ββοΈ Justice Madan B. Lokur:
PCMA is a secular law prevails over Hindu and Muslim law.
π¨ββοΈ Justice Deepak Gupta:
The Special Act deals with children prevail over Hindu and Muslim law. (Generalia Specilibus Non Derogant)
2. Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Shaikh v. State of Gujarat, 2016
Muslim personal law would not prevail over 2006 child marriage act
3. Khaledur Rahman v. State of
Kerala, 2022
It is trite law that when the provisions of a statute are repugnant to, or contrary to the customary law or personal law, in the absence of any specific exclusion of the said customary or personal law from the statutory provisions, the statute will prevail, and the personal law or the customary law shall stand abrogated to the extent of the inconsistency
4. Mohamed Abbas M. v. Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, 2015
Provisions of Prohibition
of Child Marriage Act, 2006 are in no way against the religious rights of Muslim or any religion guaranteed under Articles 25 and 29 of the Constitution.
β DISAGREEMENT with High courtsβ (Muslim girl can marry upon reaching puberty)
1. Patna High Court-
Md. Idris v. State of Bihar and Others, 1980
2. Punjab and Haryana High Court-
Jammu v. State of Haryana, 2010
3. Delhi High Court-
Tahra Begum v. State Of Delhi, 2012
Held: Prohibition
of Child Marriage Act, 2006 Overrides all religion including muslim personal law.
β‘Matter sub judice before Supreme court as well-
https://t.me/LegalQuizzes/304157
@CurrentLegalGK
π20β€3β‘1π₯1π1
The Doctrine Of Per Incuriam In Indian Jurisprudence: Implications And Judicial Responses
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/doctrine-per-incuriam-indian-jurisprudence-implications-judicial-responses-265796
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/doctrine-per-incuriam-indian-jurisprudence-implications-judicial-responses-265796
www.livelaw.in
The Doctrine Of Per Incuriam In Indian Jurisprudence: Implications And Judicial Responses
The Indian higher judiciary, represented by the Supreme Court and High Courts, plays a crucial role in adjudicating and interpreting laws within the country's legal framework. The decisions these...
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
The Doctrine Of Per Incuriam In Indian Jurisprudence: Implications And Judicial Responses https://www.livelaw.in/articles/doctrine-per-incuriam-indian-jurisprudence-implications-judicial-responses-265796
π
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2820
Instead of reading this just go through the index of this PDF
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2820
We will tell you what is best for you.
Telegram
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
LAW OF PRECEDENTS
1. Ratio decidendi
2. Speaking order v. Non speaking order
3. Casua observations
4. Obiter dicta
Circumstances that weaken the
binding force of a precedent
β’ Ruling reversed by a higher court
β’ When affirmed or reversed on a differentβ¦
1. Ratio decidendi
2. Speaking order v. Non speaking order
3. Casua observations
4. Obiter dicta
Circumstances that weaken the
binding force of a precedent
β’ Ruling reversed by a higher court
β’ When affirmed or reversed on a differentβ¦
π―1
Police Act, 1861.pdf
351.7 KB
π
βοΈReading Index is the 1st Rule
Eg. S. 44 General Diary.
Magistrate of the district shall be at liberty to call for and inspect such diary
@CurrentLegalGK
Police Act 1861β‘ Use- To clear doubts in investigation and also to mention basic magistrate powers and duty based sections in answers also Criminal lawyers must read it.ο»Ώ
βοΈReading Index is the 1st Rule
Eg. S. 44 General Diary.
Magistrate of the district shall be at liberty to call for and inspect such diary
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯2π1π1
For Inter-State Arrest, Police Must Follow Guidelines : Delhi High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/guidelines-framed-for-inter-state-arrests-by-police-151639
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/guidelines-framed-for-inter-state-arrests-by-police-151639
www.livelaw.in
For Inter-State Arrest, Police Must Follow Guidelines : Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has issued guidelines that must be followed by the police of one State, when they go to some other State or Union Territory, to effect an arrest while investigating a...
π1π₯1