𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
831 photos
11 videos
1.65K files
2.94K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

πŸ‘¨β€βš– Filtered Information Brings Clarity.

🌐THE BEST FROM ALL LEGAL UPDATES BY EOD.

"Finding Quintessence of all possible POVs of provisions and Precedents
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Supreme Court Raises Concerns About Fresh Law Graduates Joining Judiciary, Low AIBE Standards & Politicisation Of Bar https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-raises-concerns-about-fresh-law-graduates-joining-judiciary-low-aibe-standards-politicisation…
πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ The Issue of Experienceβ€”

Do you guys really think experience is necessary?


Can 70% of MPCJ justify experience?

ο»Ώ
Should we not make changes in the legal education system also?


CJI goes to NLU why not to local government college?


No question raised by SC judges (suo moto) on major errors in conducting exams by HCs and PSCs


Why not to Increase the Level of Training? In that way fresh talent + good experience with little stipend


Whether practice of 2-3 years will give him experience?


Are there any other ways? Like to change the pattern of examination?


Any international practice that can be adopted?


ο»ΏπŸ’¬ Comment Your Concrete & neutral views

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ’―9πŸ‘4πŸ”₯4❀1🀩1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
'Permanent Alimony Is Awarded To Ensure Decent Living Standard For Wife' : Supreme Court Lists Out Factors To Be Considered https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/permanent-alimony-is-awarded-to-ensure-decent-living-standard-for-wife-supreme-court-lists-out-factors…
πŸ€‘ Factors to be considered for Alimonyβ€”

✍️ Case- Kiran Jyot Maini vs Anish Pramod Patel

These factors include but are not limited to:

i. Status of the parties, social and financial.

ii. Reasonable needs of the wife and dependent children.

iii. Qualifications and employment status of the parties.

iv. Independent income or assets owned by the parties.

v. Maintain standard of living as in the matrimonial home.

vi. Any employment sacrifices made for family responsibilities.

vii. Reasonable litigation costs for a non-working wife.

viii.Financial capacity of husband, his income, maintenance obligations, and liabilities.

{Note: Status of parties significant factor}


-------------------------------
πŸ’ΈπŸ’΄ For maintenanceβ€”
⚑ Case- Rajnesh v. neeha, 2020

1. Maintenance of minor children
2. Serious disability or Ill health
3. Where wife is earning some income
4. Age and employment of parties.
5. Right to residence.
6. Citedβ€” Delhi High Court in Bharat Hedge v Smt. Saroj Hegde, 2007 πŸ‘‡

β€œ1. Status of the parties.
2. Reasonable wants of the claimant.
3.The independent income and property of the claimant.
4. The number of persons, the non-applicant has to maintain.
5. The amount should aid the applicant to live in a similar lifestyle as he/she enjoyed in the matrimonial home.
6. Non-applicant’s liabilities, if any.
7. Provisions for food, clothing, shelter, education, medical attendance and treatment etc. of the applicant.
8. Payment capacity of the non-applicant.
9. Some guess work is not ruled out while estimating the income of the non-applicant when all the sources or correct sources are not disclosed.
10. The non-applicant to defray the cost of litigation.
11. The amount awarded u/s 125 Cr.PC is adjustable against the
amount awarded u/ 24 of the Act.


--------------------------------

Irretrievable Breakdown Factors

🌟 Case Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan., 2023

1. The factors encompassed a period of cohabitation after marriage
2. The nature and gravity of allegations made by the parties.
3. Orders passed in previous or pending legal proceedings
4. Attempts at reconciliation or settlement and their outcomes.
5. Period of separation and other similar considerations
.

Alimony, maintenance and irretrievable breakdown of marriage factors


#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
#MAINTENANCE@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘7❀2πŸ”₯1πŸ‘Œ1πŸ’―1
πŸŒ… #Quote

Justice without power is inefficient; power without justice is tyranny.... Justice and power must therefore be brought together, so that whatever is just may be powerful, and whatever is powerful may be just."

~Blaise Pascal


Use: Excessive use of power by police.

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘7❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ”₯2
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
'Furlough not a legal right': Supreme Court explains difference between Parole and furlough | SCC Times https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/10/21/furlough-not-a-legal-right-supreme-court-explains-difference-between-parole-and-furlough/
πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸŒ Furlough v. Parole
State of Gujarat v. Narayana, 2021


1. Furlough and parole envisage a short-term temporary release from custody;

2. While parole is granted for the prisoner to meet a specific exigency, furlough may be granted after a stipulated number of years have been served without any reason;

3. The grant of furlough is to break the monotony of imprisonment and to enable the convict to maintain continuity with family life and integration with society;

4. Although furlough can be claimed without a reason, the prisoner does not have an absolute legal right to claim furlough;

5. The grant of furlough must be balanced against the public interest and can be refused to certain categories of prisoners



@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘6❀3πŸ”₯1πŸ’―1
🧠 #Question

Mention the Provisions/cases of CrPC/BNSS which deals with EXCEPTIONS to the Principle of Natural Justice. Also explain the reasons behind it.

🌟 Natural justice consists of 3 broad principlesβ€”
1. Audi alteram partem
2. Nemo judex in causa sua
3. Reasoned decision.


@CurrentLegalGK
✍3⚑1πŸ‘1πŸ‘Œ1