𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
831 photos
11 videos
1.65K files
2.94K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

πŸ‘¨β€βš– Filtered Information Brings Clarity.

🌐THE BEST FROM ALL LEGAL UPDATES BY EOD.

"Finding Quintessence of all possible POVs of provisions and Precedents
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
'Community Service' Under The BNS – An Incomplete Yet Promising Penologocial Advancement https://www.livelaw.in/articles/community-service-under-bhartiya-nyaya-sanhita-262322
🌳🌱 Community service

It is pertinent to note that in 1997, the 156th Law Commission Report had recommended for an amendment to Section 53 IPC to include 'community service' as an alternate to prison sentence, however, this recommendation was never adopted.

The first statutory reference for β€œcommunity service” in India, is found in S. 18 (1)(c) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. However, there was no provision for community service under the general penal law till the BNS, 2023.

🌟 Sunita Gandharva v State of MP, 2020 (not the first case)

The issue before the MP High Court was whether the scope of bail condition u/s 437(3) CrPC was wide enough to include community service. The High Court answered the question in the affirmative and held that the phrase β€œany other conditions in the interest of justice” laid down in Section 437(3) of CrPC gave the power to the Court to direct the accused/ offender to perform community service or other connected reformatory measures.

πŸ“ Provisions with Community serviceβ€”

1. Involvement of public servants in illegal trade (Section
202)

2. Non-appearance in response to a proclamation (Section
209)

3. Attempt to commit suicide to influence legal authority
(Section 226)

4. First conviction of petty theft involving property valued
below β‚Ή5,000. (Section 303 (2)

5. Public misconduct by a drunken person (Section 355)

6. Defamation [Section 356(2)]

Default in serving community service.

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘6😍4πŸ‘2πŸ”₯1
🧠 #MCQ by @CurrentLegalGK

A transferee who purchased a suit property via a registered sale deed during the pendency of a suit sought impleadment as a necessary party to defend his title. The impleadment was denied on the ground that Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1881 renders the transfers pendente lite void. Decide.

a. The impleadment was rightly denied as the doctrine of lis pendens renders the pendente lite transfers void.

b. The doctrine of lis pendens does not render all transfers pendente lite to be void ab initio. It only impacts the rights of the persons who are party to the pending litigation.

c. The impleadment cannot be denied to a transferee as there exists no bar to the impleadment of transferees pendente lite with notice to protect his interest in the suit property purchased via registered sale deed.

d. Both (b) and (c)


Answer πŸ‘‡
πŸ‘6
🧠 #MCQ by @CurrentLegalGK

An incriminating material was posed by the prosecution against the accused, however, the accused was not provided a chance to explain the incriminating material posed against him. Decide.

a. Trial Could be vitiated if provisions of Section 351 of BNSS (akin to Section 313 CrPC) are not followed.

b. Depriving an accused to explain the incriminating material posed against him by the prosecution is contrary to Section 351 BNSS.

c. Non-adherence to the provision of Section 313 of CrPC would result in an acquittal of the accused if it prejudices the accused.

d. All of the Above.


@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘1
🧠 #MCQ by @CurrentLegalGK

Mr. A approached the Writ Court for Setting Aside the auction sale of his property on the ground that the executive authority had sold his property in violation of law. However, the Writ Court dismissed the petition on the ground that the conditions of Order 21 Rule 90 for setting aside a sale were not fulfilled by Mr. A. Decide.

a. Writ Court has rightly dismissed the petition as the conditions of Order 21 Rule 90 CPC ought to have been fulfilled by Mr. A.

b. Writ Court cannot ask Mr. A to fulfill conditions of Order 21 Rule 90 CPC for setting aside an illegal sale made in violation of law.

c. Order 21 Rule 90 CPC does not apply to writ court.

d. Both (b) and (c
)

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘3😍1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
πŸ“βœοΈ Do you want a Synopsis for Essay writing. We have shared enough material for understanding as well as for practice. Share outline for the below topic in 10 Sentences as what you are going to cover if you would write an essay on it. 1. Simpleβ€” How far…
✍️ Any one❓

https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3406
πŸ‘1πŸ‘Œ1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Supreme Court Raises Concerns About Fresh Law Graduates Joining Judiciary, Low AIBE Standards & Politicisation Of Bar https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-raises-concerns-about-fresh-law-graduates-joining-judiciary-low-aibe-standards-politicisation…
πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ The Issue of Experienceβ€”

Do you guys really think experience is necessary?


Can 70% of MPCJ justify experience?

ο»Ώ
Should we not make changes in the legal education system also?


CJI goes to NLU why not to local government college?


No question raised by SC judges (suo moto) on major errors in conducting exams by HCs and PSCs


Why not to Increase the Level of Training? In that way fresh talent + good experience with little stipend


Whether practice of 2-3 years will give him experience?


Are there any other ways? Like to change the pattern of examination?


Any international practice that can be adopted?


ο»ΏπŸ’¬ Comment Your Concrete & neutral views

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ’―9πŸ‘4πŸ”₯4❀1🀩1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
'Permanent Alimony Is Awarded To Ensure Decent Living Standard For Wife' : Supreme Court Lists Out Factors To Be Considered https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/permanent-alimony-is-awarded-to-ensure-decent-living-standard-for-wife-supreme-court-lists-out-factors…
πŸ€‘ Factors to be considered for Alimonyβ€”

✍️ Case- Kiran Jyot Maini vs Anish Pramod Patel

These factors include but are not limited to:

i. Status of the parties, social and financial.

ii. Reasonable needs of the wife and dependent children.

iii. Qualifications and employment status of the parties.

iv. Independent income or assets owned by the parties.

v. Maintain standard of living as in the matrimonial home.

vi. Any employment sacrifices made for family responsibilities.

vii. Reasonable litigation costs for a non-working wife.

viii.Financial capacity of husband, his income, maintenance obligations, and liabilities.

{Note: Status of parties significant factor}


-------------------------------
πŸ’ΈπŸ’΄ For maintenanceβ€”
⚑ Case- Rajnesh v. neeha, 2020

1. Maintenance of minor children
2. Serious disability or Ill health
3. Where wife is earning some income
4. Age and employment of parties.
5. Right to residence.
6. Citedβ€” Delhi High Court in Bharat Hedge v Smt. Saroj Hegde, 2007 πŸ‘‡

β€œ1. Status of the parties.
2. Reasonable wants of the claimant.
3.The independent income and property of the claimant.
4. The number of persons, the non-applicant has to maintain.
5. The amount should aid the applicant to live in a similar lifestyle as he/she enjoyed in the matrimonial home.
6. Non-applicant’s liabilities, if any.
7. Provisions for food, clothing, shelter, education, medical attendance and treatment etc. of the applicant.
8. Payment capacity of the non-applicant.
9. Some guess work is not ruled out while estimating the income of the non-applicant when all the sources or correct sources are not disclosed.
10. The non-applicant to defray the cost of litigation.
11. The amount awarded u/s 125 Cr.PC is adjustable against the
amount awarded u/ 24 of the Act.


--------------------------------

Irretrievable Breakdown Factors

🌟 Case Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan., 2023

1. The factors encompassed a period of cohabitation after marriage
2. The nature and gravity of allegations made by the parties.
3. Orders passed in previous or pending legal proceedings
4. Attempts at reconciliation or settlement and their outcomes.
5. Period of separation and other similar considerations
.

Alimony, maintenance and irretrievable breakdown of marriage factors


#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
#MAINTENANCE@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘7❀2πŸ”₯1πŸ‘Œ1πŸ’―1
πŸŒ… #Quote

Justice without power is inefficient; power without justice is tyranny.... Justice and power must therefore be brought together, so that whatever is just may be powerful, and whatever is powerful may be just."

~Blaise Pascal


Use: Excessive use of power by police.

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘7❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ”₯2