๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
852 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.1K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Preโ€“Nuptial Agreement https://www.livelaw.in/columns/prenuptial-agreement-matrimonial-alliance-family-court-divorce-218522
๐ŸŒŸ ALL ABOUT PRE NUPTIAL AGREEMENTS

โœ“ Meaning- Nuptial: Relating to Marriage, So an Agreement where couples are not married yet is called the Pre Nuptial Agreement.

๐ŸŒŸ Origin- Western Concept, especially U.S.A. because of almost 50% of Marriages ends up with divorce.

โœ“ Marvin v. Marvin, 1979 brings out the prevalence of non โ€“ marital agreements stating that unmarried couples can enter into the Pre โ€“ Nuptial Agreement via means of written, oral or implied form of contract.

โœ“ Purpose- Security for couples regarding pre- disclosure of proportion of assets for maintenance, conditions and to avoid litigation.

๐ŸŒŸ Concept of Pre Nuptial Agreement in India

1. No statutory provision
Pre โ€“ Nuptial Agreement in India, the agreement only helped the court to establish the base to determine the grant of divorce but not legally binding (only persuasive value).

2. "R. Rambilas vs. Ms. Anita, 2018
"A clause in an agreement that wife shall not be entitled to claim maintenance from husband cannot be used in proceedings under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., since, such clause is opposed to public policy and, therefore, void under Section 23 of the Contract Act."

3. Portugese civil code 1867 (goa ucc) has a provision of Pre Nuptial Agreement

4. Statutory rights and liabilities under, beneficial legislations such as Section 125 CrPC Section 24 HMA Section 20 DV Act and other codified personal and secular laws in India, cannot be bartered or negated by either spouse by entering into an agreement to the contrary.

5. A Family Court in Mumbai recently held that while a prenuptial agreement cannot be upheld as a binding contract India, it can still be considered to gain insight into the intentions of the parties involved.

๐ŸŒŸ Conclusion- Courts almost never decide the case of maintenance or divorce as per party wishes or on time and to avoid such situations Prenups are made but still in India it has no legal binding authority due to India's public policy under section 23 of Contract Act however a Prenup can be made and has a great value in deciding a case of dowry, streedhan, claims of maintenance based on earlier facts which have effect afterwards provided it should not be against any other law.

Remedy: Dowry Prohibition (Maintenance of Lists of Presents to the Bride and Bridegroom) Rules, 1985

#Discernible_Topics
@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘12๐Ÿ’ฏ6๐Ÿ‘Œ4๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿคฉ1๐Ÿ˜1
๐ŸŒŸ Bachan Singh vs State Of Punjab, 1980

โœ๏ธ Article 19 -

"The six fundamental freedoms guaranteed under Article 19(1) are not absolute rights.

Firstly, they are subject to inherent restraints stemming from the reciprocal obligation of one member of a civil society to so use his rights as not to infringe or injury similar rights of another. This is on the principle "sic uteri tuo ut alienum non laedas"

Secondly, under Cls. (2) to (6) these rights have been expressly made subject to the power the State impose reasonable restrictions, which may even extend prohibition, on the exercise of those rights."


๐ŸŒŸ L.I. IS RULE AND DEATH PENALTY IS EXCEPTION

"...It is imperative to voice the concern that courts, aided by the broad illustrative guidelines indicated by us, will discharge the onerous function with evermore scrupulous care and humane concern, directed along the highroad of legislative policy out- lined in Section 354(3), viz., that for persons convicted of murder, life imprisonment is the rule and death sentence an exception...."

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ‘4โค1๐Ÿคฉ1๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ’ฏ1
โœ๏ธ Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat, 2019

Whether after filing of chargesheet, magistrate has power to order further investigation, if yes then up to what stage


Bench- Full bench of 3 judges

1. R. F. Nariman
2. Mr. Justice Surya Kant
3. Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian


๐ŸŒŸ Now Read this: https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2774

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿคฉ2
๐ŸŒŸ P. Naveen Kumar v. The District Collector 2024

The Madras High Court observed that no private individual can prevent any devotee from exercising his right to religion or any other fundamental right and if the right to privacy includes sexual orientation, it includes spiritual orientation as well.

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘8๐Ÿ‘3
๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ ๐ŸŒŸ SUNITA DEVI VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2024

We recommend the Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, to consider introducing a comprehensive policy, possibly by way of getting an appropriate report from a duly constituted Sentencing Commission consisting of experts in different fields for the purpose of having a distinct sentencing policy. We request the Union of India to respond to our suggestion by way of an affidavit within a period of six months from today.โ€

โ€œA Judge can never have unrestrictive and unbridled discretion, based upon his conscience formed through his understanding of the society, without there being any guidelines in awarding a sentence. The need for adequate guidelines for exercising sentencing discretion, avoiding unwanted disparity, is of utmost importance

โœ“ Unnecessary Discretion on Sentencing Violative of Fundamental Rights
"Sentencing shall not be a mere lottery. It shall also not be an outcome of a knee-jerk reaction. This is a very important part of the Fundamental Rights conferred under Articles 14 and 21.
Any unwarranted disparity would be against the very concept of a fair trial and, therefore, against justice.

โœ“ Section 360 & Probation of offenders ACT, 1958
โ€œAny attempt to ignore either Section 360 of the CrPC, 1973 or the provisions as mandated in the Act, 1958 would make their purpose redundantโ€ฆ.Therefore, we have absolute clarity in our mind, that a trial court is duty bound to comply with the mandate of Section 360 of the CrPC, 1973 read with Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Probation Act before embarking into the question of sentence.โ€,

โœ๏ธ You can use this is in mains answer writing as jurisprudential essence of POA

โœ“ Principles of Sentencing through cases- (search for more)
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2252

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘11๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿคฉ1
๐ŸŒŸ Secularism in Detail

Focus on Panthernirpeksh vs dharmanirpeksh, Judiciary, difference with western secularism, and summary

Note Making is essential โœ๏ธ

Watch in 1.5ร—


https://youtu.be/G0HMuIXWCAc?feature=shared
๐Ÿ‘7โค2๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿณ1
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Gopi Thotakura becomes first Indian space tourist: What is space travel โ€” and how much can a journey cost? ๐Ÿ”— #explained_sci_tech #express_explained
Blue Origin has not disclosed the price that its latest set of passengers paid for a seat on this journey. But according to space.com website, a similar journey on a Virgin Galactic spacecraft costs about $450,000 (about Rs 3.75 crore). A journey to the ISS is now estimated to cost anything between 20 to 25 million dollars (about Rs 160 to 210 crore). A recent NASA paper mentions that space companies SpaceX and Space Adventures were planning to offer a journey around the Moon for about 70 to 100 million dollars (about Rs 600 to 850 crore).

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ˜ฑ1๐Ÿ‘Œ1
Cognizance Sh. Pradeep Mehta.pdf
642.3 KB
What is Cognizance.
2. Taking of Cognizance.
3. Cognizance is of offence not offender.
4. Cognizance of offence by magistrate.
5. Important points on Cognizance.
6. Making over of cases to Magistrates.
7. Cognizance of offence by Court of Sessions.
8. Cognizance taken by a magistrate not empowered.
9. Limitation on power to take Cognizance of offences.
10. Cognizance under special enactments.
a. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
b. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
c. The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
d. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
e. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
11. Limitation for taking Cognizance.
12. Computing the period of limitation u/s 468 CrPC.
13. Conclusion.

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘16๐Ÿ”ฅ1