ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Challenge To Surrogacy Law : Supreme Court Frames Issues To Consider, Hearing In July 2024 https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-issues-in-pleas-challenging-provisions-of-surrogacy-act-rules-256985
π
1. Whether the prohibition of commercial surrogacy under Sections 4(ii)(b) & 4(ii)(c) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 is constitutional?
2. Whether the right of a couple to avail surrogacy being restricted to married couples between the age of 23 to 50 years in case of female and between 26 to 55 years in case of male as provided in Section 4(iii)(c)(I) read with Section 2(1)(h) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, is constitutional?
3. Whether the right of a single woman to avail surrogacy being restricted to only widows or divorcees between the ages of 35 to 45 years as provided under Section 2(1)(s) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021, is constitutional?
4. Whether the right of an intending couple to avail surrogacy being restricted to only those couples who do not have a surviving child as provided under Section 4(iii)(c)(II) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021, is constitutional?
5. Whether individuals who initiated the process of availing surrogacy prior to the enactment of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 have any right to avail surrogacy in a manner beyond the scope of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, save for cases falling within the ambit of Section 53 of the Act?
Refer:- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/874
@CurrentLegalGK
Challenge to Surrogacy Law1. Whether the prohibition of commercial surrogacy under Sections 4(ii)(b) & 4(ii)(c) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 is constitutional?
2. Whether the right of a couple to avail surrogacy being restricted to married couples between the age of 23 to 50 years in case of female and between 26 to 55 years in case of male as provided in Section 4(iii)(c)(I) read with Section 2(1)(h) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, is constitutional?
3. Whether the right of a single woman to avail surrogacy being restricted to only widows or divorcees between the ages of 35 to 45 years as provided under Section 2(1)(s) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021, is constitutional?
4. Whether the right of an intending couple to avail surrogacy being restricted to only those couples who do not have a surviving child as provided under Section 4(iii)(c)(II) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021, is constitutional?
5. Whether individuals who initiated the process of availing surrogacy prior to the enactment of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 have any right to avail surrogacy in a manner beyond the scope of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, save for cases falling within the ambit of Section 53 of the Act?
Refer:- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/874
@CurrentLegalGK
π5π₯1π―1
Trial_Of_Summons_Cases_Explained_By_Justice_V_Ramkumar_Part_I.pdf
156.9 KB
π Trial of Summons Case 2οΈβ£Read Twice
Pre-trial release of the accused
The purpose of stating the βparticulars of the offenceβ to the accused under Section 251 Cr.P.C and thereafter taking his plea is for deciding whether or not the accused should be tried for the alleged offences. Once the accused pleads not guilty to the βsubstance of accusationβ stated to him, the trial starts. Once the trial starts, the view taken by the Supreme Court is that the Magistrate cannot go back to the pre-trial stage and cannot prematurely terminate the proceedings and that the trial which has already started should reach its logical culmination by βconvictionβ or βacquittalβ as the case may be. .{ Adalat Prasad v. Rooplal Jindal 2004 }
π Dr. Kamala Rajaram v. Dy.S.P, Office of the S.P Neyyattinkara 2005
Even before the substance of the accusation is read over to the accused, the proceedings against him can be dropped and the accused can be released u/s 258
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯1π«‘1
Revenue Accelerating Progress final.pdf
505.8 KB
Accelerating Progress
through a Constitutional Roadmap for Justice and Development From a Tax Perspective
@CurrentLegalGK
through a Constitutional Roadmap for Justice and Development From a Tax Perspective
@CurrentLegalGK
π3
Supreme Court Clarifies That Its Order On Minimum 1/3rd Women's Reservation In SCBA Posts Is On 'Experimental Basis'
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-scba-women-reservation-experimental-basis-257131
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-scba-women-reservation-experimental-basis-257131
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Clarifies That Its Order On 1/3rd Women's Reservation In SCBA Posts Is On 'Experimental Basis', Impediments May Beβ¦
The Supreme Court today (May 06) clarified that its order whereby it had directed reservation of minimum one-third seats for women in the Supreme Court Bar Association's executive committee is on an...
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Supreme Court Clarifies That Its Order On Minimum 1/3rd Women's Reservation In SCBA Posts Is On 'Experimental Basis' https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-scba-women-reservation-experimental-basis-257131
π Supreme Court Bar Association v. BD Kaushik, 2024
In this case it was directed to make reforms and 1/3rd reservation seats for women.
Recent clarification order-
Court observed that SCBA is a βpremier institution,β and its norms cannot remain static. The Court also underscored the need for timely reforms to confront the institution's challenges. Thus, the Court also passed directions to the SCBA to call for suggestions from the bar for reforming the SCBA rules regarding eligibility conditions for contestants, admission fee etc.
@CurrentLegalGK
In this case it was directed to make reforms and 1/3rd reservation seats for women.
Recent clarification order-
Court observed that SCBA is a βpremier institution,β and its norms cannot remain static. The Court also underscored the need for timely reforms to confront the institution's challenges. Thus, the Court also passed directions to the SCBA to call for suggestions from the bar for reforming the SCBA rules regarding eligibility conditions for contestants, admission fee etc.
minimum one-third seats for women in the Supreme Court Bar Association's executive committee is on an "experimental basis" and that any difficulty faced in implementing the reforms would be placed before the Court.
@CurrentLegalGK
π3π₯1π1
π
1. 249- National Interest.
2. 250- National Emergency
3. 252- Agreement with state.
4. 253- International treaty.
5. 356- President rule.
β¨ 6. 369- Temporary Power to Parliament to make laws with respect to certain matters in state list, 5 years from enforcement of CoI.
@CurrentLegalGK
When Parliament can Legislate on State list.1. 249- National Interest.
2. 250- National Emergency
3. 252- Agreement with state.
4. 253- International treaty.
5. 356- President rule.
β¨ 6. 369- Temporary Power to Parliament to make laws with respect to certain matters in state list, 5 years from enforcement of CoI.
@CurrentLegalGK
π12π―2β1π1
Mere Expression 'Benefit Of Doubt' In Judgment Doesn't Mean Acquittal Was Not Honourable; Entire Reasoning Has To Be Appreciated: Bombay High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/bombay-high-court/bombay-high-court-honourable-acquittal-benefit-of-doubt-231059
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/bombay-high-court/bombay-high-court-honourable-acquittal-benefit-of-doubt-231059
www.livelaw.in
Mere Expression 'Benefit Of Doubt' In Judgment Doesn't Mean Acquittal Was Not Honourable; Entire Reasoning Has To Be Appreciated:β¦
The Bombay High Court recently held that just because the expression βbenefit of doubtβ has been used in a judgment acquitting a person, does not mean that the acquittal was not honourable and the...
District_Judiciary__Fundamental_Rights1.pdf
635 KB
Role of District Judiciary In
Protecting Fundamental Rights
So if you say my favourite subject is Constitution you can quote these cases why constitution is essential for District Judiciary as well.
Landmark Judgments from CrPC / BNSS
@CurrentLegalGK
Protecting Fundamental Rights
So if you say my favourite subject is Constitution you can quote these cases why constitution is essential for District Judiciary as well.
Landmark Judgments from CrPC / BNSS
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯5π2β€1π1
PRECEDENT.pdf
640.2 KB
LAW OF PRECEDENTS
1. Ratio decidendi
2. Speaking order v. Non speaking order
3. Casual observations
4. Obiter dicta
Circumstances that weaken the
binding force of a precedent
β’ Ruling reversed by a higher court
β’ When affirmed or reversed on a different ground
β depending on the circumstances
β’ When legislature enacts a statute that is
inconsistent with the precedent
β’ Inconsistent with earlier decisions of a higher
court or a court of the same rank
β’ Precedent sub silentio
β’ When rendered per incuriam
@CurrentLegalGK
1. Ratio decidendi
2. Speaking order v. Non speaking order
3. Casual observations
4. Obiter dicta
Circumstances that weaken the
binding force of a precedent
β’ Ruling reversed by a higher court
β’ When affirmed or reversed on a different ground
β depending on the circumstances
β’ When legislature enacts a statute that is
inconsistent with the precedent
β’ Inconsistent with earlier decisions of a higher
court or a court of the same rank
β’ Precedent sub silentio
β’ When rendered per incuriam
Doctrine of merger by later cases that supercede earlier or enhance it.
@CurrentLegalGK
π12π―2β€1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π₯³ππ π Grab The Opportunity | Contest for Judgment Writing Book π§ Theme: Quiz Making Contest π° Registeration: Free Application deadline: Quizzes to be sent before 9th May, (2nd Anniversary of Natural Justice) π. QUIZ MAKING GUIDELINES-- 1. Minimum 1β¦
π
π₯³ Free contest
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2725
Last 2 Days for the Quiz Making Contestβ
π₯56 Entries Received
π₯³ Free contest
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2725
π2π1π―1
π General Meanings of β
βPardon
βCommutation
βRemission
βReprieve or suspension
βRespite
@CurrentLegalGK
βPardon
βCommutation
βRemission
βReprieve or suspension
βRespite
#Question
So a person will not be considered a rescidivist for section 75 IPC if he gets pardon???
@CurrentLegalGK
π10π₯3π€©1
Can Courts Admit Evidence Which Has Been Obtained Illegally Or Improperly?
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/illegally-obtained-evidence-admissibility-143609
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/illegally-obtained-evidence-admissibility-143609
www.livelaw.in
Can Courts Admit Evidence Which Has Been Obtained Illegally Or Improperly?
The admissibility of evidence in Courts in India is dependent on its relevancy as per the provisions of Indian Evidence Act.Illegality or impropriety in obtaining the evidence will not affect its...
π4π1π1π―1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Can Courts Admit Evidence Which Has Been Obtained Illegally Or Improperly? https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/illegally-obtained-evidence-admissibility-143609
π Pooran Mal v Director of Inspection AIR 1974
After quoting the observations of the Privy Council in ( Kuruma v The Queen [1955]) the SC observed as follows:
"It would be thus seen that in India, as in English, where the test of admissibility of evidence lies in its relevancy, unless there is an express or necessarily implied prohibition in the Constitution or other law, evidence obtained as a result of illegal search or seizure is not liable to be shut out".
#Interview
@CurrentLegalGK
After quoting the observations of the Privy Council in ( Kuruma v The Queen [1955]) the SC observed as follows:
"It would be thus seen that in India, as in English, where the test of admissibility of evidence lies in its relevancy, unless there is an express or necessarily implied prohibition in the Constitution or other law, evidence obtained as a result of illegal search or seizure is not liable to be shut out".
#Interview
@CurrentLegalGK
π5β3π₯2π―1
Do marriages need to be registered? What happens if they are not? π
#explained_law #express_explained #hindu_marriage_act #special_marriage_act
#explained_law #express_explained #hindu_marriage_act #special_marriage_act
The Indian Express
Do marriages need to be registered? What happens if they are not?
Last week, the Supreme Court ruled that a Hindu marriage is not valid βunless performed with ceremonies in proper formβ. This was despite the couple in question having an official marriage certificate. Here is why.
π3π2π₯2