5_6165487546965954047.pdf
647.8 KB
π2π2
π Very Important for Quality and Relevancy of the Channel.
π NOTE: READ ALL OPTIONS THEN ONLY CLICK.... π₯ 1. You are Currently .............. . Choose one whichever suits you. βοΈ 2. Comment your Needs whatever it is or from whatever background.
π NOTE: READ ALL OPTIONS THEN ONLY CLICK.... π₯ 1. You are Currently .............. . Choose one whichever suits you. βοΈ 2. Comment your Needs whatever it is or from whatever background.
Anonymous Quiz
66%
Civil Judge Aspirant
6%
Practicing Advocate for LESS than 5 years Experience
3%
Practicing Advocate for MORE than 5 Years of Experience.
3%
Entry Level District Judge Aspirant
8%
2nd of 3 year course OR 3/4th Year of 5 Year Course
6%
Final Year Graduation
3%
UGC NET CLEARED
2%
JRF CLEARED
2%
UPSC LAW OPTIONAL
1%
Corporate or Paralegal Lawyer
π6β‘1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’ pinned Β«π *Select the 1st Option Only if you are an Undergraduate Degree Holder* @CurrentLegalGKΒ»
π¨ββοΈ
π INVESTIGATION CONSISTS OFβ
β1) Proceeding to the concerned SPOT,
2) Ascertainment of FACTS and circumstances,
3) Discovery and ARREST,
4) Collection of evidence which includes EXAMINATION of various persons, SEARCH of places and seizure of things.
5) Formation of an OPINION on whether an offence is made out, and filing the CHARGESHEET accordingly.β
π₯π¨ββοΈ SHARIF AHMED v. UTTAR PRADESH, 2024
π RELEVANCY OF CHARGESHEET
The details of the offence and investigation are not supposed to be a comprehensive thesis of the prosecution case, but at the same time, must reflect a thorough investigation into the alleged offence. It is on the basis of this record that the court can take effective cognisance of the offence and proceed to issue the process in terms of Section 190(1)(b) and Section 204 of the Code. In case of doubt or no offence is made out, it is open to the Magistrate to exercise other options.
π DUTY OF I.O. AND CHARGESHEET CONTENTS
Investigating officer must make clear and complete entries of all columns in the chargesheet so that the court canβ
1. Clearly understand which crime has been committed
2. By which accused and
3. What is the material evidence available on the file
4. Statements of 161 & related documents have to be enclosed
5. With the list of witnesses.
6. Role played by the accused in the crime should be separately and clearly mentioned in the chargesheet, for each of the accused persons.β,
πNON- BAILABLE WARRANT
βWhile there are no comprehensive set of guidelines for the issuance of nonbailable warrants, this Court has observed on several occasions that nonbailable warrants should not be issued, unless the accused is
1. Charged with a heinous crime,
and is likely to
2. Evade the process of law or
3. Tamper/destroy evidence.
@CurrentLegalGK
H.N. Rishbud and Inder Singh v. State of Delhi, 1954π INVESTIGATION CONSISTS OFβ
β1) Proceeding to the concerned SPOT,
2) Ascertainment of FACTS and circumstances,
3) Discovery and ARREST,
4) Collection of evidence which includes EXAMINATION of various persons, SEARCH of places and seizure of things.
5) Formation of an OPINION on whether an offence is made out, and filing the CHARGESHEET accordingly.β
π₯π¨ββοΈ SHARIF AHMED v. UTTAR PRADESH, 2024
π RELEVANCY OF CHARGESHEET
The details of the offence and investigation are not supposed to be a comprehensive thesis of the prosecution case, but at the same time, must reflect a thorough investigation into the alleged offence. It is on the basis of this record that the court can take effective cognisance of the offence and proceed to issue the process in terms of Section 190(1)(b) and Section 204 of the Code. In case of doubt or no offence is made out, it is open to the Magistrate to exercise other options.
π DUTY OF I.O. AND CHARGESHEET CONTENTS
Investigating officer must make clear and complete entries of all columns in the chargesheet so that the court canβ
1. Clearly understand which crime has been committed
2. By which accused and
3. What is the material evidence available on the file
4. Statements of 161 & related documents have to be enclosed
5. With the list of witnesses.
6. Role played by the accused in the crime should be separately and clearly mentioned in the chargesheet, for each of the accused persons.β,
πNON- BAILABLE WARRANT
βWhile there are no comprehensive set of guidelines for the issuance of nonbailable warrants, this Court has observed on several occasions that nonbailable warrants should not be issued, unless the accused is
1. Charged with a heinous crime,
and is likely to
2. Evade the process of law or
3. Tamper/destroy evidence.
@CurrentLegalGK
π12π₯5π3π1
π¨ββοΈπ§
π Meaning of Cognizance - (To be aware or To take judicial notice)
'Taking cognizance' which merely means judicial application of the mind of the Magistrate to the facts mentioned in the complaint with a view to take further action.
π When is it not a Cognizance?
π R.R. Chari v. Uttar Pradesh 1951
When the Magistrate applies his mind not for the purpose of proceeding under the subsequent sections of this Chapter, but for taking action of some other kind, e.g. ordering investigation under S.156(3), or issuing a search warrant for the purpose of the investigation.
π Can a Magistrate order investigation after taking cognizance?
Yes, 202 CrPC, Magistrate can direct an investigation to be made either by a police officer or by any other person. But it is only for a-
limited purpose: Only for helping the Magistrate to decide whether or not there is sufficient ground to proceed further.
Note: Case can be said to be instituted in a Court only when the Court takes cognizance.
(Chapter Caption)
π Is the magistrate bound to take cognizance when he receives a Complaint?
No, Not bound to take cognizance if the facts alleged in the complaint, disclose the commission of an offence.
Discretion- "May take Cognizance"
π D. Lakshminarayana Reddy vs. V. Narayana Reddy 1976
Allegations disclose cognizable offence and the forwarding of the complaint to the police for investigation under s. 156(3) will be conducive to justice and save the valuable time of the Magistrate in enquiring into a matter which was primarily the duty of the police to investigate, he will be justified in adopting that course as an alternative
π What is the difference between an investigation under S. 156(3) and S.202 of CrPC?
π GIST- Chapter 14 containing s. 190 deals with post-cognizance stage, Chapter 12, so far as Magistrate is concerned, deals with pre- cognizance stage that is to say, once a Magistrate starts acting u/s. 190 and the provisions following, he cannot resort to s. 156(3).
π D. Lakshminarayana Reddy vs. V. Narayana Reddy 1976 π
1. Difference on Stagesβ
In case of a complaint regarding the commission of a cognizable offence, the power under 156(3) can be invoked by the Magistrate before he takes cognizance of the offence under 190(1)(a). But if he once takes such cognizance and embarks upon the procedure embodied in Chapter XV, he is not competent to switch back to the pre-cognizance stage and avail of 156(3).
2. Difference on Purposeβ
156(3) Preemptory Reminder or Intimation- which embraces the entire continuous process which begins with the collection of evidence and ends with a report or charge sheet under 173. On the other hand 202 comes in at a stage when some evidence has been collected by the Magistrate in proceedings under Chapter XV, but the same is deemed insufficient to take a decision as to the next step in the prescribed procedure.
π― MCQ on Cognizance-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2645
@CurrentLegalGK
All About Cognizance π Meaning of Cognizance - (To be aware or To take judicial notice)
'Taking cognizance' which merely means judicial application of the mind of the Magistrate to the facts mentioned in the complaint with a view to take further action.
π When is it not a Cognizance?
π R.R. Chari v. Uttar Pradesh 1951
When the Magistrate applies his mind not for the purpose of proceeding under the subsequent sections of this Chapter, but for taking action of some other kind, e.g. ordering investigation under S.156(3), or issuing a search warrant for the purpose of the investigation.
π Can a Magistrate order investigation after taking cognizance?
Yes, 202 CrPC, Magistrate can direct an investigation to be made either by a police officer or by any other person. But it is only for a-
limited purpose: Only for helping the Magistrate to decide whether or not there is sufficient ground to proceed further.
Note: Case can be said to be instituted in a Court only when the Court takes cognizance.
(Chapter Caption)
π Is the magistrate bound to take cognizance when he receives a Complaint?
No, Not bound to take cognizance if the facts alleged in the complaint, disclose the commission of an offence.
Discretion- "May take Cognizance"
π D. Lakshminarayana Reddy vs. V. Narayana Reddy 1976
Allegations disclose cognizable offence and the forwarding of the complaint to the police for investigation under s. 156(3) will be conducive to justice and save the valuable time of the Magistrate in enquiring into a matter which was primarily the duty of the police to investigate, he will be justified in adopting that course as an alternative
π What is the difference between an investigation under S. 156(3) and S.202 of CrPC?
π GIST- Chapter 14 containing s. 190 deals with post-cognizance stage, Chapter 12, so far as Magistrate is concerned, deals with pre- cognizance stage that is to say, once a Magistrate starts acting u/s. 190 and the provisions following, he cannot resort to s. 156(3).
π D. Lakshminarayana Reddy vs. V. Narayana Reddy 1976 π
1. Difference on Stagesβ
In case of a complaint regarding the commission of a cognizable offence, the power under 156(3) can be invoked by the Magistrate before he takes cognizance of the offence under 190(1)(a). But if he once takes such cognizance and embarks upon the procedure embodied in Chapter XV, he is not competent to switch back to the pre-cognizance stage and avail of 156(3).
2. Difference on Purposeβ
156(3) Preemptory Reminder or Intimation- which embraces the entire continuous process which begins with the collection of evidence and ends with a report or charge sheet under 173. On the other hand 202 comes in at a stage when some evidence has been collected by the Magistrate in proceedings under Chapter XV, but the same is deemed insufficient to take a decision as to the next step in the prescribed procedure.
π― MCQ on Cognizance-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2645
@CurrentLegalGK
π16π1π―1
πβοΈπ
π Corresponding section- 46 CrPC
π Prem Shankar Shukla vs Delhi Administration, 1980 and Sunil batra m, 1978 Guidelinesβ
1. Handcuffing is, prima facie, inhuman, unreasonable & Arbitrary.
2. Competing claims of securing the prisoner from fleeing and protecting his personality from barbarity have to be harmonized.
& So on...
π Citizens For Democracy vs State Of Assam, 1995 (directions reiterated)
β Where the police or the jail authorities have well-grounded basis for drawing a strong inference that a particular prisoner is likely to jump jail or break out of the custody then the said prisoner be produced before the Magistrate concerned and a prayer for permission to handcuff the prisoner be made before the said Magistrate.
β Order required from magistrate for Remand and search warrant for Handcuffing.
π Table is attached for List of Offences in which Handcuffing is allowed.
@CurrentLegalGK
Section 43(3) BNSS Handcuffing π Corresponding section- 46 CrPC
π Prem Shankar Shukla vs Delhi Administration, 1980 and Sunil batra m, 1978 Guidelinesβ
1. Handcuffing is, prima facie, inhuman, unreasonable & Arbitrary.
2. Competing claims of securing the prisoner from fleeing and protecting his personality from barbarity have to be harmonized.
& So on...
π Citizens For Democracy vs State Of Assam, 1995 (directions reiterated)
β Where the police or the jail authorities have well-grounded basis for drawing a strong inference that a particular prisoner is likely to jump jail or break out of the custody then the said prisoner be produced before the Magistrate concerned and a prayer for permission to handcuff the prisoner be made before the said Magistrate.
β Order required from magistrate for Remand and search warrant for Handcuffing.
π Table is attached for List of Offences in which Handcuffing is allowed.
Is 43(3) BNSS correct as per guidelines?
@CurrentLegalGK
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
List of Offences in which Handcuffing is allowed
πβοΈπ
π Corresponding section- 46 CrPC
π Prem Shankar Shukla vs Delhi Administration, 1980 and Sunil batra, 1978 Guidelinesβ
Handcuffing is, prima facie, inhuman, unreasonable & Arbitrary.
π Aeltemesh Rein v. Union of India, (1988)
SC directed UOI to make Guidelines and rules for Handcuffing use.
π Citizens For Democracy vs State Of Assam, 1995
The Supreme Court relied on its decisions in Sunil Batra and Prem Shankar Shukla cases laid down guidelines for use of handcuff and directed all ranks of police and prison authorities to meticulously obey the guidelines.
π Guidelines are as followsβ
β‘1. General rule
Handcuffs or other fetters shall not be forced on a prisoner - convicted or under-trial-while lodged in a jail anywhere in the country or while transporting or in transit from one jail to another or from jail to court and back. The police and the jail authorities, ON THEIR OWN, shall have no authority to direct the hand- cuffing of any inmate of a jail in the country or during transport from one jail to another or from jail to court and back.
2. Exceptions-
Where the police or the jail authorities have a well-grounded basis for drawing a strong inference that a particular prisoner is likely to jump jail or break out of the custody:-
π«±then he be produced before the Magistrate concerned and
π«±Prayer for permission to handcuff the prisoner be made before the said Magistrate.
Magistrate discretionβ
Save in rare cases of concrete proof regarding proneness of the prisoner to violence,'his tendency to escape, he being so dangerous/desperate and the finding that no other practical way of forbidding escape is available, the β Magistrate may grant permission to handcuff the prisoner.
3. Special orders required in remand order for judicial/police custody (167), execution of a warrant of arrest.
4. When police can handcuff without order of magistrate
If Person is arrested by the police without warrant the police officer concerned may if he is satisfied, on the basis of the guidelines given above (dangerous/desperate, tendency to escape etc..) that it is necessary to handcuff such a person, he may do so till the time he is taken to the police station and thereafter his production before the Magistrate. Further use of fetters thereafter can only be under the orders of the Magistrate as already indicated above.
5. All Ranks of Police officers have to follow the above guidelines and non compliance will be dealt as contempt of court.
π Table is attached for List of Offences in which Handcuffing is allowed.
π Compensation Awarded
Sabah Al Zarid v. State of Assam, 2023 awarded Rs. 5,00,000/- compensation to the petitioner which was payable by the respondent and held the handcuffing of the petitioner by the respondent contrary to the law laid down by Supreme Court.
@CurrentLegalGK
Section 43(3) BNSS Handcuffing π Corresponding section- 46 CrPC
π Prem Shankar Shukla vs Delhi Administration, 1980 and Sunil batra, 1978 Guidelinesβ
Handcuffing is, prima facie, inhuman, unreasonable & Arbitrary.
Prem Shankar Declared the use of handcuffs unconstitutional under article 21. However, the court has carved out certain exceptions to the general practice of use of handcuffs
π Aeltemesh Rein v. Union of India, (1988)
SC directed UOI to make Guidelines and rules for Handcuffing use.
π Citizens For Democracy vs State Of Assam, 1995
The Supreme Court relied on its decisions in Sunil Batra and Prem Shankar Shukla cases laid down guidelines for use of handcuff and directed all ranks of police and prison authorities to meticulously obey the guidelines.
π Guidelines are as followsβ
β‘1. General rule
Handcuffs or other fetters shall not be forced on a prisoner - convicted or under-trial-while lodged in a jail anywhere in the country or while transporting or in transit from one jail to another or from jail to court and back. The police and the jail authorities, ON THEIR OWN, shall have no authority to direct the hand- cuffing of any inmate of a jail in the country or during transport from one jail to another or from jail to court and back.
2. Exceptions-
Where the police or the jail authorities have a well-grounded basis for drawing a strong inference that a particular prisoner is likely to jump jail or break out of the custody:-
π«±then he be produced before the Magistrate concerned and
π«±Prayer for permission to handcuff the prisoner be made before the said Magistrate.
Magistrate discretionβ
Save in rare cases of concrete proof regarding proneness of the prisoner to violence,'his tendency to escape, he being so dangerous/desperate and the finding that no other practical way of forbidding escape is available, the β Magistrate may grant permission to handcuff the prisoner.
3. Special orders required in remand order for judicial/police custody (167), execution of a warrant of arrest.
4. When police can handcuff without order of magistrate
If Person is arrested by the police without warrant the police officer concerned may if he is satisfied, on the basis of the guidelines given above (dangerous/desperate, tendency to escape etc..) that it is necessary to handcuff such a person, he may do so till the time he is taken to the police station and thereafter his production before the Magistrate. Further use of fetters thereafter can only be under the orders of the Magistrate as already indicated above.
5. All Ranks of Police officers have to follow the above guidelines and non compliance will be dealt as contempt of court.
π Table is attached for List of Offences in which Handcuffing is allowed.
Is 43(3) BNSS correct as per guidelines?
π Compensation Awarded
Sabah Al Zarid v. State of Assam, 2023 awarded Rs. 5,00,000/- compensation to the petitioner which was payable by the respondent and held the handcuffing of the petitioner by the respondent contrary to the law laid down by Supreme Court.
@CurrentLegalGK
π7π₯2
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Article 361: Immunity shield until Governor in office π #express_explained
ππ¨βπΌ
π Provisions: Article 361, S. 133 CPC,
π Case- Rameshwar Prasad v Union of India, 2006 that outlined the immunity enjoyed by the Governor βeven on allegation of personal malafides,β the Supreme Court held that βthe position in law, is that the Governor enjoys complete immunity.β
π What about civil immunity?
No Civil case can be instituted during his term of office whether an act is done before or after entering his office as President/ Governor until the expiration of two months next after NOTICE in writing has been delivered to the President/Governor or left at his officeβ
β Stating the nature of the
proceedings.
β Cause of action,
β Name,
β Description and Place of residence of the party by whom such proceedings are to be instituted and the
β Relief which he claims.
π Exceptionsβ
1. Article 61:-
β Conduct of the President (only) be brought under review
by any court, tribunal or body
β Appointed or designated
by either House of Parliament
β For investigation of a charge under article 61
2. Case against State:-
Right of any person to bring appropriate proceedings against GOI or GOS.
3. After he ceases from the office.
@CurrentLegalGK
Immunity to President and Governorπ Provisions: Article 361, S. 133 CPC,
π Case- Rameshwar Prasad v Union of India, 2006 that outlined the immunity enjoyed by the Governor βeven on allegation of personal malafides,β the Supreme Court held that βthe position in law, is that the Governor enjoys complete immunity.β
π What about civil immunity?
No Civil case can be instituted during his term of office whether an act is done before or after entering his office as President/ Governor until the expiration of two months next after NOTICE in writing has been delivered to the President/Governor or left at his officeβ
β Stating the nature of the
proceedings.
β Cause of action,
β Name,
β Description and Place of residence of the party by whom such proceedings are to be instituted and the
β Relief which he claims.
π Exceptionsβ
1. Article 61:-
β Conduct of the President (only) be brought under review
by any court, tribunal or body
β Appointed or designated
by either House of Parliament
β For investigation of a charge under article 61
2. Case against State:-
Right of any person to bring appropriate proceedings against GOI or GOS.
3. After he ceases from the office.
#Question
Mention the provisions of laws dealing with immunity for Judges
@CurrentLegalGK
π5π₯2π1π1π―1
RJS MOCK TEST 3 @CurrentLegalGK.pdf
212.4 KB
β€βπ₯6π4π―2π1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π₯³ππ π Grab The Opportunity | Contest for Judgment Writing Book π§ Theme: Quiz Making Contest π° Registeration: Free Application deadline: Quizzes to be sent before 9th May, (2nd Anniversary of Natural Justice) π. QUIZ MAKING GUIDELINES-- 1. Minimum 1β¦
Telegram
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π₯³ππ π Grab The Opportunity | Contest for Judgment Writing Book
π§ Theme: Quiz Making Contest
π° Registeration: Free
Application deadline:
Quizzes to be sent before 9th May, (2nd Anniversary of Natural Justice)
π. QUIZ MAKING GUIDELINES--
1. Minimumβ¦
π§ Theme: Quiz Making Contest
π° Registeration: Free
Application deadline:
Quizzes to be sent before 9th May, (2nd Anniversary of Natural Justice)
π. QUIZ MAKING GUIDELINES--
1. Minimumβ¦
π₯3π1
π₯π
This time RJS is going to be tough either the paper or the cut off, I hope it goes with the former one.
Anyways in both the situations we have to study hard with a proper daily plan, which must contain the practical syllabus coverage on time with daily practice and time for revisions and review of tests...
If you need Questions and MCQs then Participate in the Quiz Making Contest pinned above π (31 entries recieved till now) all participants will get something π
Let's predict the RJS cut off before the exam and not afterwards because we have control over it now.
My Estimation says:- 70-75 if the paper is aligned with the PYQ analysis & a little bit of evolving pattern.
RJS CLEAR HOGA???This time RJS is going to be tough either the paper or the cut off, I hope it goes with the former one.
Anyways in both the situations we have to study hard with a proper daily plan, which must contain the practical syllabus coverage on time with daily practice and time for revisions and review of tests...
If you need Questions and MCQs then Participate in the Quiz Making Contest pinned above π (31 entries recieved till now) all participants will get something π
Let's predict the RJS cut off before the exam and not afterwards because we have control over it now.
My Estimation says:- 70-75 if the paper is aligned with the PYQ analysis & a little bit of evolving pattern.
Tip: Solve all State law PYQ especially Rajasthan exams.@CurrentLegalGK
For Hindi and English solve RPSC Exam papers as well.
π12π€7β€1β€βπ₯1π₯1