CAA rules out: How Constituent Assembly debated the question of citizenship, tying it to religion ๐
#express_explained
#express_explained
The Indian Express
CAA rules out: How Constituent Assembly debated the questions of citizenship, tying it to religion
Many of the arguments around the CAA echo those made in the Constituent Assembly more than 70 years ago, including that 'India was a natural home to Hindus and Sikhs' and 'Assam's demography was being changed'. Here is what was argued, and how Nehru, othersโฆ
๐คฉ
We will compile and make a summary most probably within 2 days as long lasting notes which can be used for your GK portion whether prelims or mains and some commentary for essay.
@CurrentLegalGK
All these articles need not be read, it is up to you.We will compile and make a summary most probably within 2 days as long lasting notes which can be used for your GK portion whether prelims or mains and some commentary for essay.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐5โค2๐1๐ฏ1
Analysis of Article 143 of the Constitution of India | SCC Blog
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/05/12/analysis-of-article-143-of-the-constitution-of-india-legal-research-legal-news-updates/
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/05/12/analysis-of-article-143-of-the-constitution-of-india-legal-research-legal-news-updates/
SCC Times
Explained| Article 143 of the Constitution of India
The first reference under Article 143 was made in the Delhi Laws case, wherein, the President referred three questions to the Supremeโฆ
๐ฏ2๐1๐ฅ1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Analysis of Article 143 of the Constitution of India | SCC Blog https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/05/12/analysis-of-article-143-of-the-constitution-of-india-legal-research-legal-news-updates/
Must read this, A. 143 invoked 15 times and its constitutional application.
๐
Eastern Book Company - Practical Lawyer
https://www.ebc-india.com/lawyer/articles/9807a1.htm#:~:text=In%20Kesavananda%20Bharati%20v.,3%5D%20as%20one%20of%20them.
Changing Perceptions of SecularismEastern Book Company - Practical Lawyer
https://www.ebc-india.com/lawyer/articles/9807a1.htm#:~:text=In%20Kesavananda%20Bharati%20v.,3%5D%20as%20one%20of%20them.
Ebc-India
Eastern Book Company - Practical Lawyer
Eastern Book Company, India: The best Law Reports, Legal Databases, Commentaries, Bare Acts and Student Books from a publishing house committed to quality and authenticity.
Abortion As A Constitutional Right: France Judgment From Indian Perspective
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/abortion-as-a-constitutional-right-france-judgment-from-indian-perspective-251924
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/abortion-as-a-constitutional-right-france-judgment-from-indian-perspective-251924
www.livelaw.in
Abortion As A Constitutional Right: France Judgment From Indian Perspective
In recent news, France made headlines by declaring abortion a constitutional right, marking a milestone in the realm of rights for women. But does it align with the values and perspectives of...
CompNRIPIOOCI_25042017.pdf
83.5 KB
๐4๐ญ1
'Atrocious' : Supreme Court Frowns Upon Madras HC Judgment That Watching Child Porn In Private Isn't Offence
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/atrocious-supreme-court-frowns-upon-madras-hc-judgment-that-watching-child-porn-in-private-isnt-offence-251885
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/atrocious-supreme-court-frowns-upon-madras-hc-judgment-that-watching-child-porn-in-private-isnt-offence-251885
www.livelaw.in
'Atrocious' : Supreme Court Frowns Upon Madras HC Judgment That Watching Child Porn In Private Isn't Offence
The Supreme Court on Monday (March 11), orally expressed disapproval of a
๐1๐1๐ฏ1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
'Atrocious' : Supreme Court Frowns Upon Madras HC Judgment That Watching Child Porn In Private Isn't Offence https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/atrocious-supreme-court-frowns-upon-madras-hc-judgment-that-watching-child-porn-in-private-isnt-offence-251885
Telegram
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
S Harish v Inspector of Police and Another
Author critices the recent madras HC judgment based on irrelevant citation (kerala HC) and ignorance of landmark citation (482/226) coupled with wrong interpretation of 67B (sub-clause b)
๐ง Weird MCQ was basedโฆ
Author critices the recent madras HC judgment based on irrelevant citation (kerala HC) and ignorance of landmark citation (482/226) coupled with wrong interpretation of 67B (sub-clause b)
๐ง Weird MCQ was basedโฆ
Uttarakhand's UCC โ Unifying Laws Or Dividing Communities? [Part-I]
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/uttarakhand-uniform-civil-code-and-personal-laws-implications-analysis-252125
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/uttarakhand-uniform-civil-code-and-personal-laws-implications-analysis-252125
www.livelaw.in
Uttarakhand's UCC โ Unifying Laws Or Dividing Communities? [Part-I]
All the transient provisions in the Constitution, such as for language, reservation, special status to Jammu and Kashmir, or the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), were treated as transient because there...
๐1๐1
UN Terms - Agreement Treaty convention protocol MOU Modus vivendi etc...
https://treaties.un.org/Pages/overview.aspx?path=overview/definition/page1_en.xml#:~:text=The%201969%20Vienna%20Convention%20defines,and%20whatever%20its%20particular%20designation%22.
https://treaties.un.org/Pages/overview.aspx?path=overview/definition/page1_en.xml#:~:text=The%201969%20Vienna%20Convention%20defines,and%20whatever%20its%20particular%20designation%22.
treaties.un.org
UNTC
Ceci est la page d'accueil de la Collection des traitรฉs des Nations Unies.
๐ฅ1
DJS Mains Solved Civil @CurrentLegalGK.pdf
32.2 MB
2022 DJS Shailendra Mains Solved Answers
๐ 2007th Edition
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1033
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ 2007th Edition
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1033
@CurrentLegalGK
๐3๐2๐ญ1
๐Issues with horizontal Devolution of State share
โ Several Indian states, particularly in the south, have raised concerns about decreasing shares of central transfers, highlighting the need for a review by the Sixteenth Finance Commission.
โ The primary cause for the declining shares of southern states is attributed to the income distance criterion, which favors states farther from the highest income state, impacting distributions based on economic and social justice principles.
โ The cesses and surcharges imposed by the Centre have reduced the divisible pool, affecting the share of states despite a recommendation to increase it, pointing to a critical area needing reassessment.
โ Suggestions include modifying the weight of the income distance criterion and imposing limits on cesses and surcharges to address disparities and ensure a fairer distribution among states.
@CurrentLegalGK
โ Several Indian states, particularly in the south, have raised concerns about decreasing shares of central transfers, highlighting the need for a review by the Sixteenth Finance Commission.
โ The primary cause for the declining shares of southern states is attributed to the income distance criterion, which favors states farther from the highest income state, impacting distributions based on economic and social justice principles.
โ The cesses and surcharges imposed by the Centre have reduced the divisible pool, affecting the share of states despite a recommendation to increase it, pointing to a critical area needing reassessment.
โ Suggestions include modifying the weight of the income distance criterion and imposing limits on cesses and surcharges to address disparities and ensure a fairer distribution among states.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐1๐ฅ1
๐บ Intermediary rules 2023 Kunal Kamra v. UOI
By a 2:1 majority and in a setback for the petitioners in the 2023 IT Rules Amendment Case, the Bombay High Court -in an interim order โ has refused to restrain the Union government from notifying its Fact Check Unit.
Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of the IT Rules amendment 2023 empowers the government to establish a Fact check Unit and unilaterally declare online content related to the government's business on social media platforms as fake, false or misleading.
https://www.youtube.com/live/c2_olSwKTYo?feature=shared
By a 2:1 majority and in a setback for the petitioners in the 2023 IT Rules Amendment Case, the Bombay High Court -in an interim order โ has refused to restrain the Union government from notifying its Fact Check Unit.
Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of the IT Rules amendment 2023 empowers the government to establish a Fact check Unit and unilaterally declare online content related to the government's business on social media platforms as fake, false or misleading.
https://www.youtube.com/live/c2_olSwKTYo?feature=shared
YouTube
Analysing the Bombay HC's verdict in Kunal Kamra v UOI and IT Rules 2021 with Adv. Vrinda Bhandari
Register for LiveLaw Academy's latest Certificate course on Privacy and Data Protection Laws with Adv. Vrinda Bhandari
starting from 16th March 2024 (Five Saturdays: 10.30AM to 12PM)
Fees- Rs. 4499/-
- https://livelawacademy.graphy.com/courses/ONLINEโฆ
starting from 16th March 2024 (Five Saturdays: 10.30AM to 12PM)
Fees- Rs. 4499/-
- https://livelawacademy.graphy.com/courses/ONLINEโฆ
๐1๐ฏ1
๐จโโ๏ธ
We will now take Aid from this website to prepare #case_brief
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1900?single
As previously shared again sharing this fortnightly law report by supreme court, explore the recent landmark cases read the briefs.We will now take Aid from this website to prepare #case_brief
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1900?single
Telegram
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
๐1
Evolving Legal Framework Of Online Skill-Based And Chance-Based Games
https://www.livelaw.in/law-firms/law-firm-articles-/betting-gambling-public-gambling-act-kyc-information-technology-act-asia-cup-cricket-tournament-singhania-and-partners-llp-236614
https://www.livelaw.in/law-firms/law-firm-articles-/betting-gambling-public-gambling-act-kyc-information-technology-act-asia-cup-cricket-tournament-singhania-and-partners-llp-236614
www.livelaw.in
Evolving Legal Framework Of Online Skill-Based And Chance-Based Games
In the realm of Indian law, a pivotal distinction exists between "Game of Skills" and "Game of Chance." Game of Skills, can be identified by their reliance on the knowledge of the player,...
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Evolving Legal Framework Of Online Skill-Based And Chance-Based Games https://www.livelaw.in/law-firms/law-firm-articles-/betting-gambling-public-gambling-act-kyc-information-technology-act-asia-cup-cricket-tournament-singhania-and-partners-llp-236614
๐ฎ๐๏ธ
#Question
@CurrentLegalGK
Do you think Dream 11 and other similar apps are game of skill and not game of chance?#Question
@CurrentLegalGK
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
๐ฎ๐๏ธ Do you think Dream 11 and other similar apps are game of skill and not game of chance? #Question @CurrentLegalGK
๐ง
โ How to Distinguish between both---
K. R. Lakshmanan v/s State of Tamil Nadu, 1966 [Landmark]
1. a game of chance whether played with stakes is gambling;
2. a game of skill whether played with stakes or without stakes is not gambling;
3. a game of mixed chance and skill is gambling, if it is substantially and preponderantly a game of chance and not of skill;
4. a game of mixed chance and skill is not gambling, if it is substantially and preponderantly a game of skill and not of chance.
โ While citing the Apex Court's ruling in the case of State of Bombay Vs. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala & Anr., AIR 1957 SC 699, wherein it was held that the games of skill are distinguishable from gambling and enjoy protection under Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India, the HC said that competitions which involve substantial skill are not gambling activities and such competitions are business activities entitled to protection guaranteed by Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India.
โ Varun Gumber Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh, 2017 , vide judgment dated 18.04.2017 and the order dated 15.09.2017 passed by the Honโble Supreme Court dismissing the Special Leave Petition against the aforesaid judgment have come to hold that the fantasy games of Dream 11 are games of mere skill and their business has protection under
Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
Avinash Mehrotra v. The State Of Rajasthan, 2021
"This matter is no longer res integra as Special Leave Petitions have come up from the Punjab & Haryana High Court and have been dismissed by this Court as early as on 15.06.2017. Also, from the Bombay High Court, Special Leave Petitions have been dismissed on 04.10.2019 and 13.12.2019.", the bench said while dismissing the SLP.
๐๐๐ In a nutshell supreme court rejected the SLP filed against judgment passed by Punjab HC bombay HC and Rjasthan HC by declaring Dream 11 as game of Skill and not chance in 2017, 2019 and 2021 respectively.
๐ง Relevance/Use- Wagering Contract, Article 19 (1) (g) and gaming rules, GST was in news as well.
@CurrentLegalGK
Answered: Game of Skill or Chance, Wagering Contractsโ How to Distinguish between both---
K. R. Lakshmanan v/s State of Tamil Nadu, 1966 [Landmark]
1. a game of chance whether played with stakes is gambling;
2. a game of skill whether played with stakes or without stakes is not gambling;
3. a game of mixed chance and skill is gambling, if it is substantially and preponderantly a game of chance and not of skill;
4. a game of mixed chance and skill is not gambling, if it is substantially and preponderantly a game of skill and not of chance.
โ While citing the Apex Court's ruling in the case of State of Bombay Vs. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala & Anr., AIR 1957 SC 699, wherein it was held that the games of skill are distinguishable from gambling and enjoy protection under Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India, the HC said that competitions which involve substantial skill are not gambling activities and such competitions are business activities entitled to protection guaranteed by Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India.
โ Varun Gumber Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh, 2017 , vide judgment dated 18.04.2017 and the order dated 15.09.2017 passed by the Honโble Supreme Court dismissing the Special Leave Petition against the aforesaid judgment have come to hold that the fantasy games of Dream 11 are games of mere skill and their business has protection under
Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
Avinash Mehrotra v. The State Of Rajasthan, 2021
"This matter is no longer res integra as Special Leave Petitions have come up from the Punjab & Haryana High Court and have been dismissed by this Court as early as on 15.06.2017. Also, from the Bombay High Court, Special Leave Petitions have been dismissed on 04.10.2019 and 13.12.2019.", the bench said while dismissing the SLP.
๐๐๐ In a nutshell supreme court rejected the SLP filed against judgment passed by Punjab HC bombay HC and Rjasthan HC by declaring Dream 11 as game of Skill and not chance in 2017, 2019 and 2021 respectively.
๐ง Relevance/Use- Wagering Contract, Article 19 (1) (g) and gaming rules, GST was in news as well.
Now How Dream 11 is More a Game of Skill rather than game of chance can be ascertained by reading the 3 HC judgments (reasoning) in detail, ex facie Dream 11 looks game of chance in general.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ฅ8๐6