𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/when-can-court-recall-judgment/article7415350.ece

Key terms - Power to recall, 362, 482 of CrPC, Article 226, interim orders, arithematical/clerical errors

πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈLandmark Case law Antulay vs Nayak

seven-member Constitution bench of the apex court reiterated its powers to recall judgements under certain circumstances. β€œThe injustice done should be corrected by applying the principle
πŸ”₯ Legal maxim - actus curiae neminem gravabit , an act of the court shall prejudice no one,” the bench said.

In State of Orissa vs Janamohan Das , the Odisha High Court elaborated the principle set in Antulay and said there has to be β€œsubstantial injury to the suitor” to recall an order.
β€œ..while conceding the power of recall available to this Court, we would say that the same would be exercisable only in exceptional cases where the mistake committed by the court is palpable and is such which, by its own force, has caused substantial injury to a suitor.”

HC bound by CrPC
While the fact that the courts have powers to recall is a settled one, there are still divisions on when this power could be exercised.

Read more....
πŸ‘4πŸ’―1
pdf_upload-367991.pdf
424.4 KB
The Supreme Court has observed that the High Court has inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to recall an order and the provisions of Section 362 Cr.P.C. would not bar it from exercise of such powers.

-------
S.C. held that if any order is passed in consonance of the prayer made in the present petition, it would invariably amount to review which is barred under Section 362 CrPC and is not permissible even under the inherent powers (Section 482) possessed by the Court.

SIMRIKHIA V. DOLLEY MUKHERJEE, (1992)

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘5πŸ’―1