BREAKING| Bribery Not Protected By Legislative Privileges; No Immunity For MPs/MLAs Taking Bribe For Vote/Speech In Legislature : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-mps-mlas-bribe-vote-speech-legislature-claim-immunity-251136

#case_brief soon....

Who owns our minerals, state, individual, or governments elected by people? -

https://goenchimati.org/who-owns-title-to-minerals-in-india/

'Abuse Of Article 19, 25 Rights' : Supreme Court Expresses Displeasure At TN Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's Comments On 'Sanatana Dharma'
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/abuse-of-article-19-25-rights-supreme-court-expresses-displeasure-at-tn-minister-udhayanidhi-stalins-comments-on-sanatana-dharma-251150

🌟 Clubbing or consolidation of F.I.R.

🌐 News- When the bench asked why should a witness in a complaint in Jammu and Kashmir be asked to go to some other jurisdiction, Singhvi reiterated his reliance on the earlier cases. He stated that in the Nupur Sharma case, the Court granted the relief of consolidation of the FIRs, despite the highly provocative nature of the comments. The senior counsel also pointed out that the cause of action in the FIRs was the same, emanating from the Tamil Nadu minister's remarks. Citing Section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he argued that territoriality was the heart of criminal jurisdiction.

👨‍⚖️Power derived from Article 142, 32, 406 CrPC,

👩‍⚖️Precedents- Singhvi relied on the orders passed by the Supreme Court in the cases of Amish Devgan, Arnab Goswami, Nupur Sharma and Mohammed Zubair allowing the consolidation of FIRs in multiple states and stated that he is only seeking the very same relief.

🌅Recent development- FIRs In Multiple States Can't Be Clubbed When Offences Under State Enactments Also Involved: Supreme Court


🌟 Landmark Judgments on development of consolidation of F.I.R. (single chargesheet is filed)

✅ 1. State of West Bengal v. Swapan Kumar Guha (1982) In this case, the Supreme Court of India held that when two FIRs have been lodged for the same incident, the investigating agency can investigate both the FIRs together if they are inter-connected and form part of the same transaction.

✅ 2. Satvinder Kaur v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (1999)
The Court also held that if the FIRs relate to different incidents, the police cannot club them together and must investigate them separately.

✅ 3. Arnab Goswami Case

Facts- Different fir for same incident in different states

The Court noted that if multiple FIRs were lodged in different jurisdictions, it would be appropriate to consolidate them in one jurisdiction and for the investigation to be conducted by one agency. However, the Court also held that the consolidation of FIRs should not be done in a manner that violates the rights of the accused or the principles of fair investigation.


@CurrentLegalGK

🌅 #Quote
The Organic Element of Law

“The inevitable truth is that law is not static and immutable but ever increasingly dynamic and grows with the ongoing passage of time.”

~ S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.
{ Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association Vs. Union of India 1993}


@CurrentLegalGK

So the PDF which is getting circulated online with name containing 'Publisizing New Criminal Law' (PNCL)

Well you can read that but that is more or less a political agenda based one.

I have shared these PDFs earlier that PNCL is a compilation of it but excludes important areas.

Try to read these PDFs topic wise and refer this Post for better start of learning New Criminal Laws. ---
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2006


For Bare Acts you can buy any publication if doesn't have time or if you are appearing in 2025 you can and should wait for some more months till that time complete these Online material and make crux 2-3 pages notes of each subject.


@CurrentLegalGK

🙂 Choose the Best option.

#MCQ
@CurrentLegalGK

As SC overturns Narasimha Rao decision, remembering its 1998 ruling in JMM cash-for-votes case 🔗
#explained_law #express_explained #jmm #p_v_narasimha_rao

Political Party Reform

Anti defection law

@CurrentLegalGK

Govt clarifies its AI advisory on elections: How to understand the concerns and criticism around the issue 🔗
#artificial_intelligence #explained_sci_tech #express_explained

🤔 Who Participated in this research 🔬

@CurrentLegalGK

😉 Model Answers for supreme court law clerk exam

✍️ Link https://www.youtube.com/live/meb2Ul4CcqA?feature=shared

@CurrentLegalGK

😎 State the reasons for your answer

https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2400

Lord Denning - A Phenomenon
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/lord-denning-life-and-his-impact-on-common-law-development-251353

तुलनात्‍मक चार्ट आईपीसी 1860 एवं बीएनएस 2023

BNS comparison in hindi

@CurrentLegalGK

🌐 On Wrongful Incarceration Default in Payment of Fine Suspension of Sentence

#Question

🌟 In default of fine--

1. Imprisonment is necessary? If not then what
2. Accused still have to pay the fine after serving imprisonment in default of fine?
3. Accused has to again serve the imprisonment if fine not paid even after serving the imprisonment in default of fine?

Comment below 👇

@CurrentLegalGK

Stop Religious Rituals During Court Events, Instead Bow Down To Constitution Or Preamble : Supreme Court Judge Justice Abhay Oka
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/stop-religious-rituals-during-court-events-instead-bow-down-to-constitution-or-preamble-justice-abhay-oka-251450

Religion and culture is different.

Haina?

Justice Gangopadhyay isn’t the first judge to have taken early retirement to make a political debut. In 1967, former Chief Justice of India Koka Subba Rao resigned three months before his retirement to fight presidential polls as an Opposition candidate against Congress’s Zakir Hussain. In 1983, former SC judge Baharul Islam resigned six weeks before his retirement to contest Lok Sabha polls as a Congress candidate from Assam’s Barpeta seat.

✅ Don't you think that there has to be a "cooling-off period" of at least two/five years for retired judges of the top court and high courts before they can accept political appointments? Comment you agree or disagree.

@CurrentLegalGK