How much are you scoring in HJS Prelims?
Anonymous Poll
26%
370-380
14%
380-390
16%
390-400
15%
400-410
9%
410-420
19%
420+
π1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
How much are you scoring in HJS Prelims?
βοΈ Just trying cut off prediction for this time as experiment.
Try -
1. Not to vote in case you haven't appeared if you want a proper result.
2. Share it with only authentic groups related of haryana Judiciary aspirants.
We will share the result of this Poll so don't worry βΊοΈ
@CurrentLegalGK
Try -
1. Not to vote in case you haven't appeared if you want a proper result.
2. Share it with only authentic groups related of haryana Judiciary aspirants.
We will share the result of this Poll so don't worry βΊοΈ
@CurrentLegalGK
π2
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π First Permanent India ICJ Judge. @CurrentLegalGK
π
B. N. RAU (1887 β1953)Sir Benegal Narsing Rau, was an Indian civil servant, jurist, diplomat and statesman known for his key role in drafting the Constitution of India. He has the distinction of being the First Permanent Judge of the International Court of Justice in The Hague, which is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN).
Now you know why Nagendra Singh is not the answer and how to search the answer from google.
I hope you got it guys βΊοΈ
(Dalveer bhandari option tick karne wale to bole hi nahi π)
π¨ββοΈ Indians contribution in International Lawβ
https://www.mea.gov.in/photo-features.htm?934/indian+contribution+to+international+law
@CurrentLegalGK
Answer of the #MCQ B. N. RAU (1887 β1953)Sir Benegal Narsing Rau, was an Indian civil servant, jurist, diplomat and statesman known for his key role in drafting the Constitution of India. He has the distinction of being the First Permanent Judge of the International Court of Justice in The Hague, which is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN).
Now you know why Nagendra Singh is not the answer and how to search the answer from google.
I hope you got it guys βΊοΈ
(Dalveer bhandari option tick karne wale to bole hi nahi π)
π¨ββοΈ Indians contribution in International Lawβ
https://www.mea.gov.in/photo-features.htm?934/indian+contribution+to+international+law
@CurrentLegalGK
π9π3π’2π2
π
Very often misunderstood and interchangeable terms with a big difference.
Now make a sentence using these to Latin phrases π
@CurrentLegalGK
Ex facie vs Prima Facie Very often misunderstood and interchangeable terms with a big difference.
@CurrentLegalGK
π4π―3
BREAKING| Bribery Not Protected By Legislative Privileges; No Immunity For MPs/MLAs Taking Bribe For Vote/Speech In Legislature : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-mps-mlas-bribe-vote-speech-legislature-claim-immunity-251136
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-mps-mlas-bribe-vote-speech-legislature-claim-immunity-251136
www.livelaw.in
Bribery Not Protected By Legislative Privileges; No Immunity For MPs/MLAs Taking Bribe For Vote/Speech In Legislature : Supremeβ¦
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court on Monday (March 4) overt
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
BREAKING| Bribery Not Protected By Legislative Privileges; No Immunity For MPs/MLAs Taking Bribe For Vote/Speech In Legislature : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-mps-mlas-bribe-vote-speech-legislature-claim-immunity-251136
#case_brief soon....
π1π1
Who owns our minerals, state, individual, or governments elected by people? -
https://goenchimati.org/who-owns-title-to-minerals-in-india/
https://goenchimati.org/who-owns-title-to-minerals-in-india/
The Goenchi Mati Movement
Who owns title to minerals in India?
Across the world, the sovereign / federal / union government usually owns title to all minerals. The big exception is the USA where land owners also own the minerals beneath the earth. Even there, β¦
π1
'Abuse Of Article 19, 25 Rights' : Supreme Court Expresses Displeasure At TN Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's Comments On 'Sanatana Dharma'
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/abuse-of-article-19-25-rights-supreme-court-expresses-displeasure-at-tn-minister-udhayanidhi-stalins-comments-on-sanatana-dharma-251150
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/abuse-of-article-19-25-rights-supreme-court-expresses-displeasure-at-tn-minister-udhayanidhi-stalins-comments-on-sanatana-dharma-251150
www.livelaw.in
'Abuse Of Article 19, 25 Rights' : Supreme Court Expresses Displeasure At TN Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's Comments On 'Sanatanaβ¦
The Supreme Court on Monday (March 4) expressed displeasure at Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin for his remarks about 'Sanatana Dharma'.A bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar...
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
'Abuse Of Article 19, 25 Rights' : Supreme Court Expresses Displeasure At TN Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's Comments On 'Sanatana Dharma' https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/abuse-of-article-19-25-rights-supreme-court-expresses-displeasure-at-tn-minister-udhayanidhiβ¦
π Clubbing or consolidation of F.I.R.
π News- When the bench asked why should a witness in a complaint in Jammu and Kashmir be asked to go to some other jurisdiction, Singhvi reiterated his reliance on the earlier cases. He stated that in the Nupur Sharma case, the Court granted the relief of consolidation of the FIRs, despite the highly provocative nature of the comments. The senior counsel also pointed out that the cause of action in the FIRs was the same, emanating from the Tamil Nadu minister's remarks. Citing Section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he argued that territoriality was the heart of criminal jurisdiction.
π¨ββοΈPower derived from Article 142, 32, 406 CrPC,
π©ββοΈPrecedents- Singhvi relied on the orders passed by the Supreme Court in the cases of Amish Devgan, Arnab Goswami, Nupur Sharma and Mohammed Zubair allowing the consolidation of FIRs in multiple states and stated that he is only seeking the very same relief.
π Recent development- FIRs In Multiple States Can't Be Clubbed When Offences Under State Enactments Also Involved: Supreme Court
π Landmark Judgments on development of consolidation of F.I.R. (single chargesheet is filed)
β 1. State of West Bengal v. Swapan Kumar Guha (1982) In this case, the Supreme Court of India held that when two FIRs have been lodged for the same incident, the investigating agency can investigate both the FIRs together if they are inter-connected and form part of the same transaction.
β 2. Satvinder Kaur v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (1999)
The Court also held that if the FIRs relate to different incidents, the police cannot club them together and must investigate them separately.
β 3. Arnab Goswami Case
Facts- Different fir for same incident in different states
The Court noted that if multiple FIRs were lodged in different jurisdictions, it would be appropriate to consolidate them in one jurisdiction and for the investigation to be conducted by one agency. However, the Court also held that the consolidation of FIRs should not be done in a manner that violates the rights of the accused or the principles of fair investigation.
@CurrentLegalGK
π News- When the bench asked why should a witness in a complaint in Jammu and Kashmir be asked to go to some other jurisdiction, Singhvi reiterated his reliance on the earlier cases. He stated that in the Nupur Sharma case, the Court granted the relief of consolidation of the FIRs, despite the highly provocative nature of the comments. The senior counsel also pointed out that the cause of action in the FIRs was the same, emanating from the Tamil Nadu minister's remarks. Citing Section 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he argued that territoriality was the heart of criminal jurisdiction.
π¨ββοΈPower derived from Article 142, 32, 406 CrPC,
π©ββοΈPrecedents- Singhvi relied on the orders passed by the Supreme Court in the cases of Amish Devgan, Arnab Goswami, Nupur Sharma and Mohammed Zubair allowing the consolidation of FIRs in multiple states and stated that he is only seeking the very same relief.
π Recent development- FIRs In Multiple States Can't Be Clubbed When Offences Under State Enactments Also Involved: Supreme Court
π Landmark Judgments on development of consolidation of F.I.R. (single chargesheet is filed)
β 1. State of West Bengal v. Swapan Kumar Guha (1982) In this case, the Supreme Court of India held that when two FIRs have been lodged for the same incident, the investigating agency can investigate both the FIRs together if they are inter-connected and form part of the same transaction.
β 2. Satvinder Kaur v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (1999)
The Court also held that if the FIRs relate to different incidents, the police cannot club them together and must investigate them separately.
β 3. Arnab Goswami Case
Facts- Different fir for same incident in different states
The Court noted that if multiple FIRs were lodged in different jurisdictions, it would be appropriate to consolidate them in one jurisdiction and for the investigation to be conducted by one agency. However, the Court also held that the consolidation of FIRs should not be done in a manner that violates the rights of the accused or the principles of fair investigation.
@CurrentLegalGK
π4π―3π€©1
π
#Quote
βThe inevitable truth is that law is not static and immutable but ever increasingly dynamic and grows with the ongoing passage of time.β
~ S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.
{ Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association Vs. Union of India 1993}
@CurrentLegalGK
The Organic Element of LawβThe inevitable truth is that law is not static and immutable but ever increasingly dynamic and grows with the ongoing passage of time.β
~ S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.
{ Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association Vs. Union of India 1993}
@CurrentLegalGK
π5π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π₯ Reading Material For BNS BNSS and BSA 1. Home Minister's speech (for interpretation) 2. Ready reckoners of the new changes and offences. π₯³π€© Criminal Manualβ https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3413 π Latest Bare Acts- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1103?singleβ¦
So the PDF which is getting circulated online with name containing 'Publisizing New Criminal Law' (PNCL)
Well you can read that but that is more or less a political agenda based one.
I have shared these PDFs earlier that PNCL is a compilation of it but excludes important areas.
Try to read these PDFs topic wise and refer this Post for better start of learning New Criminal Laws. ---
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2006
For Bare Acts you can buy any publication if doesn't have time or if you are appearing in 2025 you can and should wait for some more months till that time complete these Online material and make crux 2-3 pages notes of each subject.
@CurrentLegalGK
Well you can read that but that is more or less a political agenda based one.
I have shared these PDFs earlier that PNCL is a compilation of it but excludes important areas.
Try to read these PDFs topic wise and refer this Post for better start of learning New Criminal Laws. ---
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2006
For Bare Acts you can buy any publication if doesn't have time or if you are appearing in 2025 you can and should wait for some more months till that time complete these Online material and make crux 2-3 pages notes of each subject.
@CurrentLegalGK
As SC overturns Narasimha Rao decision, remembering its 1998 ruling in JMM cash-for-votes case π
#explained_law #express_explained #jmm #p_v_narasimha_rao
#explained_law #express_explained #jmm #p_v_narasimha_rao
The Indian Express
As SC overturns Narasimha Rao decision, remembering its 1998 ruling in JMM cash-for-votes case
The Supreme Court, in P V Narasimha Rao vs State (CBI/Spe), had held that legislators were immune from prosecution for bribery under Article 105(2) of the Constitution.
π1π―1
Govt clarifies its AI advisory on elections: How to understand the concerns and criticism around the issue π
#artificial_intelligence #explained_sci_tech #express_explained
#artificial_intelligence #explained_sci_tech #express_explained
The Indian Express
Govt clarifies its AI advisory on elections: How to understand the concerns and criticism around the issue
An earlier government advisory was criticised by some AI startups. Following the clarification, the advisory appears to have been intended more as a tool of political messaging than as a policy statement with consequential legal ramifications.
π3π―1
Sample Answers for law clerk @CurrentLegalGK.pdf
1.2 MB
π Model Answers for supreme court law clerk exam
βοΈ Link https://www.youtube.com/live/meb2Ul4CcqA?feature=shared
@CurrentLegalGK
βοΈ Link https://www.youtube.com/live/meb2Ul4CcqA?feature=shared
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π―1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π Choose the Best option. #MCQ @CurrentLegalGK
Telegram
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π Choose the Best option.
#MCQ
@CurrentLegalGK
#MCQ
@CurrentLegalGK