𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
852 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.1K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
πŸ”₯πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ Hello Harayana Judicial service Aspirant soon πŸ”œ CJ

"Saar vadhayiyaan, eh tussi laats phaats wali koshish oni te tussi saakar ho jaoge. Chak de phatte laute haan."

Best of luck this
will be your best and successful last attempt guys.

😎✍️ Fod Ke ana hai abki baar exam paar

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ™7πŸ‘3πŸ’―1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Addressing Unknown Lady As 'Darling' Is Patently Offensive, Amounts To Using Sexually Coloured Remark: Calcutta High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/calcutta-high-court/calcutta-high-court-ipc-354a-addressing-unknown-lady-as-darling-is-patently-offensive…
Addressing an unknown lady, whether a police constable or not, on the street by a man, drunken or nor, with the word β€œdarling” is patently offensive and the word used essentially a sexually coloured remark. using such expression to an unacquainted lady cannot but be an act intended to insult the modesty of the addressee. At least as of now, the prevailing standards in our society are not such that a man on the street can gleefully be permitted to use such expression in respect of unsuspecting, unacquainted women

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘5πŸ”₯2πŸ’―2
πŸŒ…#Quote

"A person is Presumed innocent until proven guilty"

(Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negatβ€”"Proof lies on him who asserts, not on him who denies")

~ Sir William Garrow


Mention any 2 exceptions πŸ‘‡

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘4πŸ’―1
3.Standard of Proof under Posco Act latest.pdf
485 KB
πŸ”Ž Standard of Proof under Posco Act latest

Concept of Reverse Burden
And Law Relating to Presumption Section 29 and 30 of POCSOAct

With exceptions to the general rule of innocence

#Question
What is the difference between establishing foundational facts and prosecution has initial burden of proof❓

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘1
πŸ€”πŸ’­ The ..................... was a legislative act passed on 28 September 1929. The act fixed the marriageable age for girls at 14 years and 18 years for boys. It is popularly known as the Sharda Act after its sponsor, Harbilas Sarda.

@CurrentLegalGK