𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
852 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.1K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Life Imprisonment Quandaries: Legal Perspectives And Sentencing Complexity https://www.livelaw.in/articles/life-imprisonment-quandaries-legal-perspectives-and-sentencing-complexity-249501
🌟 Theory of Punishment

😊 In the Indian legal system, the court possesses the authority to diminish the severity of the punishment by taking into account multiple factors related to the case and any mitigating circumstances that may be present. The underlying philosophy in India is to adhere to the reformative theory of punishment. This means that the punishment meted out should strike a balance – it should neither be excessively severe nor overly lenient to the extent that it fails to fulfil its intended purpose of making an impact on the offender and serving as a deterrent to others. The prevailing belief is that punishment should be designed in a manner that fosters personal growth and a change in an individual's mindset.

πŸ€”Dilemma -
When an appellant comes to the apex Court carrying a death sentence awarded by the trial court and confirmed by the High Court, the apex Court may find, that the case just falls short of the rarest of the rare category and may feel somewhat reluctant in endorsing the death sentence. But at the same time, having regard to the nature of the crime, the Court may strongly feel that a sentence of life imprisonment subject to remission normally works out to a term of 14 years would be grossly disproportionate and inadequate.

πŸ˜„ Solution-
This dilemma was dealt by the Supreme Court in Union of India v. V sriharan, 2016 wherein the apex court reiterated its judgement in Swamy Shraddananda v. State of Karnataka, 2008 held that:

The power to impose a modified punishment providing for any specific term of incarceration or till the end of the convict's life as an alternate to death penalty, can be exercised only by the High Court and the Supreme Court and not by any other inferior court.”

First constitutional bench case where L.I. was clarified to be for the remainder of person natural life.

βœ… Kishori Lal v. King Emperor, 1945
βœ… Gopal Vinayak Godse v. State of Maharashtra, 1961


@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘5
πŸ”₯πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ Hello Harayana Judicial service Aspirant soon πŸ”œ CJ

"Saar vadhayiyaan, eh tussi laats phaats wali koshish oni te tussi saakar ho jaoge. Chak de phatte laute haan."

Best of luck this
will be your best and successful last attempt guys.

😎✍️ Fod Ke ana hai abki baar exam paar

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ™7πŸ‘3πŸ’―1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Addressing Unknown Lady As 'Darling' Is Patently Offensive, Amounts To Using Sexually Coloured Remark: Calcutta High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/calcutta-high-court/calcutta-high-court-ipc-354a-addressing-unknown-lady-as-darling-is-patently-offensive…
Addressing an unknown lady, whether a police constable or not, on the street by a man, drunken or nor, with the word β€œdarling” is patently offensive and the word used essentially a sexually coloured remark. using such expression to an unacquainted lady cannot but be an act intended to insult the modesty of the addressee. At least as of now, the prevailing standards in our society are not such that a man on the street can gleefully be permitted to use such expression in respect of unsuspecting, unacquainted women

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘5πŸ”₯2πŸ’―2
πŸŒ…#Quote

"A person is Presumed innocent until proven guilty"

(Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negatβ€”"Proof lies on him who asserts, not on him who denies")

~ Sir William Garrow


Mention any 2 exceptions πŸ‘‡

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘4πŸ’―1
3.Standard of Proof under Posco Act latest.pdf
485 KB
πŸ”Ž Standard of Proof under Posco Act latest

Concept of Reverse Burden
And Law Relating to Presumption Section 29 and 30 of POCSOAct

With exceptions to the general rule of innocence

#Question
What is the difference between establishing foundational facts and prosecution has initial burden of proof❓

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘1
πŸ€”πŸ’­ The ..................... was a legislative act passed on 28 September 1929. The act fixed the marriageable age for girls at 14 years and 18 years for boys. It is popularly known as the Sharda Act after its sponsor, Harbilas Sarda.

@CurrentLegalGK