🔆Place of worship an unsettling dispute

✅The Supreme Court's reference to the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, in the Babri Masjid case highlighted the Act's importance in preserving the religious character of places of worship as they existed on 15 August 1947, reinforcing secular values and constitutional commitment to non-retrogression.

✅Despite the Act, there has been a surge in petitions challenging the religious character of places of worship, notably the Gyanvapi Masjid and the Shahi Idgah Masjid, reflecting efforts to overturn historical religious sites.

✅The Courts' responses to petitions challenging the Places of Worship Act and remarks by the Chief Justice of India have sparked concerns about judicial silence and the potential breach of trust, raising questions about the Act's future and its role in maintaining secularism and public peace.

@CurrentLegalGK

🔥 Haryana Mock Test Solve kroge?

Waise MPCJ wale dikh nahi rhe, lagta hai aaj ghar me shaant baithe hai ☺️🙂
(Don't worry we are with you 😁 jo hota hai acha hi hota hai)

Last time scores nahi bheje the, is baar bhejdena healthy competitive spirit intact reheti hai 😎

@CurrentLegalGK

🌟 Mock Test

You can ignore the current affairs and solve static GK + Law MCQs

@CurrentLegalGK

⚠️ Results are Out

Check out 😄

Are sorry vo 6th standard ka result Aya hai galat jagah forward kar Diya message.

Maafi chahenge 😊

Scores???

Manipur High Court Deletes Earlier Direction To Consider Inclusion Of Meiteis In ST List
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/manipur-high-court-withdrawn-direction-meiteis-inclusion-st-list-250174

Manipur ke CJ kon hai?

Name them below 👇
@CurrentLegalGK

SC terms woman military officer’s 1988 discharge ‘illegal’: How courts have ruled for women in armed forces 🔗
#explained_law #express_explained #indian_military #ssc

Important Dynasty and their founders

#History
@CurrentLegalGK

👨‍⚖️👮‍♀️Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs. Babita Puniya’

The court said that seeking a Permanent Commission or a full-length career was “justified”.

Before the ruling, only male SSC officers could opt for permanent commission after 10 years of service. Hence, women could not qualify for a government pension, which is conferred only after 20 years of service as officers.

Earlier this month, a division bench of the Punjab and Haryana HC ruled that MNS officers cannot be denied ex-serviceman status under the Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Servicemen Rules, 1982. Under this, officers who were released from service on completion of their term with a gratuity (as SSC officers do), are categorised as ex-servicemen.

Analysing The Dynamic Effects Of Registration In Trademark Infringement In Light Of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. V. Fast Cure Pharma
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/dynamic-effects-registration-trademark-infringement-dr-reddys-laboratories-fast-cure-pharma-250149

👨‍⚕️🏥 Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. v. Fast Cure Pharma 2023

Sections 47, 57, and 124 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 talk about the revocation, rectification, and the procedural hearing of such trademark suits.

Issues- the contention before the court was whether the said petition of removal and rectification would lie to the Delhi High Court, where the infringement took place, or to the Calcutta High Court, where the trademark of the respondent was registered. Therefore, the issue of territorial jurisdiction was presented before the court

The court, following the principle of “est exclusio alterius”, observed that the Trademark Act of 1999 neither expressly approves nor excludes any High Court from taking up the matter related to alteration under sections 47, 57 and 124. Also, going by the general definition of the “High Court” under the General Clauses Act, the court negated the claim that only the Calcutta High Court would have jurisdiction over the case.

Dynamic Effects of Registration

The principle of the dynamic effect of registration basically embodies that the jurisdiction would not be limited to the territoriality of the registration. It states that since the substantial matter in the case includes the issue of registration as well as the infringement of the trademark, a dynamic approach has to be taken to resolve it. Therefore, rather than sticking to the principle of territorial jurisdiction of registration, the dynamic effect also allows the trademark owner to file the suit for the infringement, where the actual infringement took place

The court relied on the case of Girdhari Lal Gupta v. K. Gian Chand & Co[3], wherein it was held that “the application could be made either before the High Court having jurisdiction over the office of the Controller of Designs which granted registration to the design or any High Court within whose jurisdiction the “dynamic effect” of the registration could be felt.

@CurrentLegalGK

Important Judgments of Haryana and Punjab high court

@CurrentLegalGK

BREAKING| Ex-SC Judge Justice AM Khanwilkar Appointed As Lokpal Chairperson
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/ex-sc-judge-justice-am-khanwilkar-appointed-as-lokpal-chairperson-250674

👮‍♂️💰 Lokpal has jurisdiction over central government to inquire into allegations of corruption against its public functionaries including the Prime Minister, cabinet ministers, members of parliament, Group A officials of the Central Government and for matters connecting them.

🌐 The Lok Pal and Lok Ayuktas Act was passed in 2013. As per Section 4 of the Act, the Chairperson and Members shall be appointed by the President after obtaining the recommendations of a Selection Committee consisting of—

(a) the Prime Minister—Chairperson;

(b) the Speaker of the House of the People—Member;

(c) the Leader of Opposition in the House of the People—Member;

d) the Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court nominated by him—Member;

(e) one eminent jurist, as recommended by the Chairperson and Members referred to in clauses (a) to (d) above, to be nominated by the President—Member.

1️⃣ The first Lok Pal Chairperson, Justice PC Ghose, was appointed in March 2019. Justice Pradip Kumar Mohnaty has been officiating as the Acting Chairperson of Lok Pal since May 2022

👨‍⚖️ At the Supreme Court, Justice Khanwilkar was part of several Constitution judgments such as the decriminalisation of homosexuality, Sabarimala women entry, validty of Aadhaar etc. He also led the bench which upheld the exoneration of Narendra Modi in the 2002 riots case, upheld the validity of the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and FCRA amendments.

@CurrentLegalGK

India’s continued refusal to ratify U.N. Convention Against Torture lacks substance – The Leaflet
https://theleaflet.in/indias-continued-refusal-to-ratify-u-n-convention-against-torture-lacks-substance/

Human rights of prisoners, accused.

#Essay

Deepfake and its Legal Implications in India

(500 words) 2 genuine entries mudt for model summary.

Hint: Related with IT Act for sure.

@CurrentLegalGK

Row over Karnataka temple Bill: What changes it proposed, how other states manage temple revenues 🔗
#express_explained