π6π―2
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Photo
βοΈ Artificial Intelligence - Importance in Indian JudiciaryBasic #essay Material
More: https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2930
@CurrentLegalGK
π5π₯2π€©1
π
#Quote
"Justice under our Constitution must mean the right to expect fair treatment from an administrative authority; and, if not, the right to approach a court for redressal. Justice cannot be an empty promise,"
~ Jijabhai dashrath shinde v. Maharastra, 2024
"Justice under our Constitution must mean the right to expect fair treatment from an administrative authority; and, if not, the right to approach a court for redressal. Justice cannot be an empty promise,"
~ Jijabhai dashrath shinde v. Maharastra, 2024
π₯3π―1
πOn the Right of maintenence for divorce Muslim women
The Supreme Court is set to decide if divorced Muslim women can claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), challenging the precedence of secular laws over personal laws.
Section 125 CrPC allows for the maintenance of destitute wives, children, and parents, including divorced women who haven't remarried.
The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, provides maintenance to divorced Muslim women only during the iddat period, with the Supreme Court's previous rulings expanding rights beyond this period.
Discussion revolves around the non-obstante clause in Section 3 of the 1986 Act, which does not explicitly bar alternative relief under Section 125 CrPC, sparking a need for an authoritative pronouncement.
@CurrentLegalGK
The Supreme Court is set to decide if divorced Muslim women can claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), challenging the precedence of secular laws over personal laws.
Section 125 CrPC allows for the maintenance of destitute wives, children, and parents, including divorced women who haven't remarried.
The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, provides maintenance to divorced Muslim women only during the iddat period, with the Supreme Court's previous rulings expanding rights beyond this period.
Discussion revolves around the non-obstante clause in Section 3 of the 1986 Act, which does not explicitly bar alternative relief under Section 125 CrPC, sparking a need for an authoritative pronouncement.
@CurrentLegalGK
π4π―2
Master Of Roster Business Should Be Dealt By First 3 Judges: Former SC Judge Justice Kurian Joseph
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cjar-seminar-master-of-roster-business-be-dealt-by-first-3-judges-former-justice-kurian-joseph-250376
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cjar-seminar-master-of-roster-business-be-dealt-by-first-3-judges-former-justice-kurian-joseph-250376
www.livelaw.in
Master Of Roster Business Should Be Dealt By First 3 Judges: Former SC Judge Justice Kurian Joseph
At the seminar hosted today by Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) at ISIL, Delhi, retired Supreme Court Justice Kurian Joseph suggested that the Master of Roster business shall...
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Master Of Roster Business Should Be Dealt By First 3 Judges: Former SC Judge Justice Kurian Joseph https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cjar-seminar-master-of-roster-business-be-dealt-by-first-3-judges-former-justice-kurian-joseph-250376
Currently by CJI/CJ/DJ
Now, the trend in the Supreme Court is that if a case is posted before a bench, people are able to predict what the result is," he said.
Solution- More Diversity in Constitutional benches, remove arbitrary act of master of roaster by 3 senior judges.
π Read them-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1594
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2178
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1557
Imp- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1564
Now, the trend in the Supreme Court is that if a case is posted before a bench, people are able to predict what the result is," he said.
Solution- More Diversity in Constitutional benches, remove arbitrary act of master of roaster by 3 senior judges.
π Read them-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1594
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2178
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1557
Imp- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1564
π1
βοΈπ¨ββοΈ Essay Topic -
District Judiciary - Part of the Basic structure of the Constitution
Send before 11PM
You will get the Model Essay only After atleast 2 Submissions from 7k+ Members.
@CurrentLegalGK
District Judiciary - Part of the Basic structure of the Constitution
Send before 11PM
You will get the Model Essay only After atleast 2 Submissions from 7k+ Members.
@CurrentLegalGK
π―2
BharatiyaSakshyaAdhiniyam_24022024.pdf
901.2 KB
π
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023), the Central Government hereby appoints the
as the date on which the provisions of the said Sanhita, except the provisions of the entry relating to section 106(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in the First Schedule, shall come into force.
So jub tak koi official notification haryana MP ya koi bhi exam ki nahi ajati you guys have to study old laws BUT
If you are graduating this year or next year you are free to neglect the old laws.
@CurrentLegalGK
Enforcement of BNS BNSS and BSAIn exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023), the Central Government hereby appoints the
1st day of July, 2024
as the date on which the provisions of the said Sanhita, except the provisions of the entry relating to section 106(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in the First Schedule, shall come into force.
So jub tak koi official notification haryana MP ya koi bhi exam ki nahi ajati you guys have to study old laws BUT
If you are graduating this year or next year you are free to neglect the old laws.
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π’2β€1π―1
π Study Material for New Laws π
We were prepared for this already π₯
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2006
We were prepared for this already π₯
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2006
π1
One Bench Of High Court Cannot Cancel Bail Granted By Another Bench : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/one-bench-of-high-court-cannot-cancel-bail-granted-by-another-bench-supreme-court-250399
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/one-bench-of-high-court-cannot-cancel-bail-granted-by-another-bench-supreme-court-250399
www.livelaw.in
One Bench Of High Court Cannot Cancel Bail Granted By Another Bench : Supreme Court
Recently, the Supreme Court observed that the exercise of jurisdiction by the Single Judge of the High Court in cancelling the bail granted to the accused by another Single Judge of...
π2
Right To Property Under Article 300A Available To A Person Who Isn't A Citizen Of India : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/right-to-property-under-article-300a-available-to-a-person-who-isnt-a-citizen-of-india-supreme-court-250381
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/right-to-property-under-article-300a-available-to-a-person-who-isnt-a-citizen-of-india-supreme-court-250381
www.livelaw.in
Right To Property Under Article 300A Available To A Person Who Isn't A Citizen Of India : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has observed that the right to property as enshrined under Article 300A of the Constitution extends to persons who are not citizens of India.βThe expression person in Article...
π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Right To Property Under Article 300A Available To A Person Who Isn't A Citizen Of India : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/right-to-property-under-article-300a-available-to-a-person-who-isnt-a-citizen-of-india-supreme-court-250381
π‘ Lucknow Nagar Nigam v. kohli Brothers, 2024
The Supreme Court expressed concerned that if the ownership of the property gets transferred from the enemy to the Custodian who takes possession of the property and administers it or manages it and thereby the ownership would then be that of the Union, in that event, it would be a deprivation of the property of the true owner who may be an enemy or an enemy subject or enemy firm but such deprivation of property cannot be without payment of compensation.
βThe expression person in Article 300-A covers not only a legal or juristic person but also a person who is not a citizen of India. The expression property is also of a wide scope and includes not only tangible or intangible property but also all rights, title and interest in a propertyβ,
@CurrentLegalGK
The Supreme Court expressed concerned that if the ownership of the property gets transferred from the enemy to the Custodian who takes possession of the property and administers it or manages it and thereby the ownership would then be that of the Union, in that event, it would be a deprivation of the property of the true owner who may be an enemy or an enemy subject or enemy firm but such deprivation of property cannot be without payment of compensation.
βThe expression person in Article 300-A covers not only a legal or juristic person but also a person who is not a citizen of India. The expression property is also of a wide scope and includes not only tangible or intangible property but also all rights, title and interest in a propertyβ,
@CurrentLegalGK
π4