𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
'Bail The Exception, Jail The Rule Under UAPA' : Supreme Court Expounds Tests To Grant Bail In UAPA Cases https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-test-for-bail-under-uapa-khalistani-terror-movement-248970
To quote the judgment, which is authored by Justice Aravind Kumar,

"The conventional idea in bail jurisprudence vis-Γ -vis ordinary penal offences that the discretion of Courts must tilt in favour of the oft-quoted phrase - 'bail is the rule, jail is the exception' – unless circumstances justify otherwise - does not find any place while dealing with bail applications under UAP Act. The 'exercise' of the general power to grant bail under the UAP Act is severely restrictive in scope. The form of the words used in proviso to Section 43D (5)– 'shall not be released' in contrast with the form of the words as found in Section 437(1) CrPC - 'may be released' – suggests the intention of the Legislature to make bail, the exception and jail, the rule
".


@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘4😁1
Cases for the date of 9th and 10th feb in advance πŸ™‚.

And by this we achieved 50 percent of our target 🌟.

Thanks for support.

32 cases in 30 days πŸ˜Žβœ…

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘17πŸ‘5🫑3πŸ”₯1
πŸ”₯ Former Prime Ministers | Prime Minister of India

1. https://www.pmindia.gov.in/en/former-prime-ministers/

2. https://www.pmsangrahalaya.gov.in/prime-ministers-of-india

List of Prime Ministers
----------------------------

β˜‘οΈ Skim the whole list and read in detail about P. V. Narsimha Rao and Chaudhary Charan Singh

Bharat Ratna awardees including M.S. Swaminathan, Karpoori Thakur, Lal Krishna Advani whilst nakung a total of 53 till now.

Highest No. of Bharat Ratnas in a year. (That is 5 in 2024)


@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘7❀3😍2
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Supreme Court Of India Much More Open To Evoke International Law Than Apex Courts Of Other Countries : ICJ Judge Hilary Charlesworth https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-of-india-much-more-open-to-evoke-international-law-than-apex-courts-of-other…
Important Article Dealt with
International current jurisprudence, problems of politics, independence of judiciary, gender and other issues.

β€œ The position that whether the Court should have compulsory jurisdiction was championed by smaller states such as New Zealand and Australia. But ultimately the view of the Soviet Union, United States and United Kingdom prevailed and that was that the jurisdiction should be voluntary and that is the situation today.”
The International Justice enunciated the three ways, the jurisdiction of the ICJ could be evoked: (1) By mutual consent of the two states involved, for eg. the ongoing territorial dispute between the coastal countries of Guatemala and Balise which was submitted mutually; (2) Treaties entered between the parties which grant the ICJ jurisdiction over the legal dispute. The recent evocation of Article 19 of the Genocide Convention by South Africa against the State of Isreal is a classic example of this point. Other such conventions incorporating a jurisdictional clause include the CEDAW, the Convention on Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the Convention Against Torture; (3) Standing declaration made by Nation States accepting the compulsory jurisdiction of the ICJ. So far only 1/3rd of the UN members have made such declarations including India (with certain exceptions), Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom
Implementation of Judicial Decisions Dependent Upon The UNSC
Justice Charlesworth explained that, unlike the domestic courts, the ICJ is devoid of having any powers on enforcement of its judgements including those considered binding on the parties involved.
However, Article 94 of the UN Charter provides that all member states undertake to abide by the decisions of the ICJ and therefore it is at their discretion to ensure that they fulfil this undertaking. Additionally, within the said provision, nation-states do have the choice of making a request to the UNSC in β€œmaking recommendations or deciding upon the measures to give effect to the judgement.”
Expressing concerns on the UNSC's inefficiency in exercising its powers critical for enforcement of ICJ decision, Justice Charlesworth opined, β€œ However what is striking now is that the UNSC has now in 8 decades has never exercised those powers that it has. The use of the Veto by one of the 5 permanent members of the UNSC can really effectively stymie that route of enforcement”

Video: https://youtu.be/8rK1eOnC1Sg

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘3πŸ”₯2
Let's us Debate on Reservation Reforms

What's your opinion (mention that you are getting it or not because ultimately it matters during a debate)
1. Deservation Required? How
2. Substitute or any out of the box solution to this inequality problem.
3. Quota within quota, creamy layer, expansion of vacancies.
4. Any solution to care based vote bank??
5. Problems faced by Brahmin, Why reservation.
6. Reservation to Every institution? Even for R&AW, if not then why no similar exemption for other relevant institutions like medical or legal fields
7. SC/ST Atrocities Act not applicable to OBCs then why no extra reservation for SC ST (they suffer more)
Common question to be answered πŸ‘‡
Comment on RESERVATION REFORMS 2024 After 75 Years of Independence



2 min Video link just for small opinion on it.
https://youtu.be/QjbnSAgeW6c


@CurrentLegalGK
🀝5πŸŽƒ4πŸ‘3