Day_29_P_Rama_Chandra_Rao_v_State_of_Karnataka_2002_watermark.pdf
857.9 KB
π Day 29 - P Rama Chandra Rao v State of Karnataka [2002]
Related to the Article 21 of the Constitution and the right to a speedy trial .
#64_cases
@CurrentLegalGK
Related to the Article 21 of the Constitution and the right to a speedy trial .
#64_cases
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯3π1π1
JUDICIAL ACADEMY JHARKHAND
1. https://jajharkhand.in/wp/?page_id=117
2. https://jajharkhand.in/wp/?page_id=268
@CurrentLegalGK
1. https://jajharkhand.in/wp/?page_id=117
2. https://jajharkhand.in/wp/?page_id=268
@CurrentLegalGK
jajharkhand.in
JUDICIAL ACADEMY JHARKHAND
Official website of Judicial Academy Jharkhand
π₯3π1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
JUDICIAL ACADEMY JHARKHAND 1. https://jajharkhand.in/wp/?page_id=117 2. https://jajharkhand.in/wp/?page_id=268 @CurrentLegalGK
π¨ββοΈ We have shared the important sources instead of material for better convenience in future.
Explore them.
@CurrentLegalGK
Explore them.
@CurrentLegalGK
Law Ministry Accepts Parliamentary Standing Committee's Recommendation To Establish Regional Benches Of Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-regional-benches-law-ministry-accept-248869
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-regional-benches-law-ministry-accept-248869
www.livelaw.in
Law Ministry Accepts Parliamentary Standing Committee's Recommendation To Establish Regional Benches Of Supreme Court
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice on Wednesday presented the 144th Report outlining the response of the Union Law Ministry to the recommendations...
Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Madras HC Direction To Conduct Murder Trial Inside Jail, Keeps Question Of Law Open
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-madras-high-court-murder-trial-jail-premises-248846
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-madras-high-court-murder-trial-jail-premises-248846
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Madras HC Direction To Conduct Murder Trial Inside Jail, Keeps Question Of Law Open
The Supreme Court on Wednesday (February 7) declined to entertain a plea challenging a directive issued by the Madras High Court to conduct trial proceedings within prison premises.This case...
π2
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Madras HC Direction To Conduct Murder Trial Inside Jail, Keeps Question Of Law Open https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-madras-high-court-murder-trial-jail-premises-248846
Trial conducted in Jail for the first time probably, the question of law is still open for future in case this practice is routinely followed.
#Witness_protection
@CurrentLegalGK
#Witness_protection
@CurrentLegalGK
π©ββ€οΈβπ¨
How Uniform is State wise UCC π
Moral policing and intrution on privacy on one hand and maintenance and other provisions on other.
#Editorial
@CurrentLegalGK
Live-in relationship legal status in Uttarakhand UCC bill.How Uniform is State wise UCC π
Moral policing and intrution on privacy on one hand and maintenance and other provisions on other.
#Editorial
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯2π―1
Merely Watching Child Pornography Not An Offence Under POCSO Act Or Section 67B Information Technology Act: Madras High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/watching-child-pornography-not-offence-under-pocso-act-madras-high-court-246551
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/watching-child-pornography-not-offence-under-pocso-act-madras-high-court-246551
www.livelaw.in
Merely Watching Child Pornography Not An Offence Under POCSO Act Or Section 67B Information Technology Act: Madras High Court
Setting aside the criminal proceedings initiated against a man, the Madras High Court recently observed that watching child pornographic videos will itself not attract offences under the Protection of...
S Harish v Inspector of Police and Another
Author critices the recent madras HC judgment based on irrelevant citation (kerala HC) and ignorance of landmark citation (482/226) coupled with wrong interpretation of 67B (sub-clause b)
π§ Weird MCQ was based on this Judgment only -
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1548
1. Is watching child pornography illegal, if yes, if no then is it treated at par to adult one ?
2. Watching Adult pornography legal?
Comment with reasons π
@CurrentLegalGK
Author critices the recent madras HC judgment based on irrelevant citation (kerala HC) and ignorance of landmark citation (482/226) coupled with wrong interpretation of 67B (sub-clause b)
π§ Weird MCQ was based on this Judgment only -
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1548
2 Question Arises π
1. Is watching child pornography illegal, if yes, if no then is it treated at par to adult one ?
2. Watching Adult pornography legal?
Comment with reasons π
@CurrentLegalGK
π4β€1π₯1
Uttarakhand UCC Bill: What changes in marriage, divorce, guardianship, and adoption? π
#an_expert_explains #explained_law #express_explained #uniform_civil_code #uttarakhand
#an_expert_explains #explained_law #express_explained #uniform_civil_code #uttarakhand
The Indian Express
Uttarakhand UCC Bill: What changes in marriage, divorce, guardianship, and adoption?
There are some positive aspects in the Bill, but also several missed opportunities. On guardianship, the mother continues to be discriminated against, and inter-faith and inter-caste couples could become more vulnerable in some ways.
β€4π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Uttarakhand UCC Bill: What changes in marriage, divorce, guardianship, and adoption? π #an_expert_explains #explained_law #express_explained #uniform_civil_code #uttarakhand
π¨ββοΈ Must 4 mins read
While there is no requirement of notice and objection for registration of marriage, upon registration, the Register of Marriages is open to public inspection. Although this may have been introduced with an intent to prevent bigamy and fraudulent marriages, it will likely disproportionately affect inter-caste and inter-faith couples by making them vulnerable to surveillance.
@CurrentLegalGK
While there is no requirement of notice and objection for registration of marriage, upon registration, the Register of Marriages is open to public inspection. Although this may have been introduced with an intent to prevent bigamy and fraudulent marriages, it will likely disproportionately affect inter-caste and inter-faith couples by making them vulnerable to surveillance.
@CurrentLegalGK
π―5π₯1
S.377 IPC | Curative Petitions Against 2013 Judgment Infructuous Since Homosexuality Was Decriminalised Later : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/s377-ipc-curative-petitions-against-2013-judgment-infructuous-since-homosexuality-was-decriminalised-later-supreme-court-248957
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/s377-ipc-curative-petitions-against-2013-judgment-infructuous-since-homosexuality-was-decriminalised-later-supreme-court-248957
www.livelaw.in
S.377 IPC | Curative Petitions Against 2013 Judgment Infructuous Since Homosexuality Was Decriminalised Later : Supreme Court
A 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday (February 8) held that the curative petition filed against the 2013 judgment, which upheld Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (which criminalised...
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
S.377 IPC | Curative Petitions Against 2013 Judgment Infructuous Since Homosexuality Was Decriminalised Later : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/s377-ipc-curative-petitions-against-2013-judgment-infructuous-since-homosexuality-was-decriminalisedβ¦
In 2009, the Delhi High Court, in the case Naz Foundation v. Union of India had struck down Section 377 IPC. In 2013, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, in Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation, reversed the Delhi High Court's judgment.
In 2018, a 5-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Navtej Sigh Johar v. Union of India, while deciding a batch of writ petitions challenging Section 377 IPC, declared that consensual homosexuality among adults cannot be criminalised and struck down the provision to that extent.
Important : https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1403?single
@CurrentLegalGK
In 2018, a 5-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Navtej Sigh Johar v. Union of India, while deciding a batch of writ petitions challenging Section 377 IPC, declared that consensual homosexuality among adults cannot be criminalised and struck down the provision to that extent.
Important : https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1403?single
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π₯1π€1
Interview @CurrentLegalGK by Dr. Krishna Murari .pdf
1.4 MB
Krishna Murari Sir Conceptual Study Material
4 Important Subjects and 1 Interview Stage.
@CurrentLegalGK
4 Important Subjects and 1 Interview Stage.
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π₯2π1