๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
852 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.1K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
X inflicted as many as 19 injuries on the arms and legs of Y with a gandasa, resulting in multiple fractures on arms and legs and also profuse bleedings. The injuries cumulatively caused the death of Y. X is tried for the offence of murder under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Determine the criminal liability of X from the alternatives given below:

A. Since X inflicted injuries only on nonvital parts of the body, hence he could not be attributed with intention to kill and therefore, cannot be held guilty of the offence of murder but only of culpable homicide not amounting to murder

B. Even though the accused did not have the intention to cause death but, nonetheless, he had intention to cause the injuries on the body of Y and the injuries so caused were thereby cumulatively sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature and so his case falls under Section 300

C. Since injuries were only on non-vital parts of the body, and there was no intention to cause death, the accused is liable only to be punished for the offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapon

D. The liability of X can at best be causing death by rash act not amounting to culpable homicide

--> Answer ๐Ÿ‘‡
1. Which option is correct,
2. What was his intention as well as motive?
3. Why not 300 thirdly?


@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ”ฅ2
๐ŸŒ… Motivation

Salary increase - from 80k to 130k (approx) isn't it a good motivation.

If not then - Only 21 judges per 10 lakh of population, you will be unique.

If not again, you will get a lot of respect within your taana marne wale relatives.

๐Ÿคด Most importantly, king used to have 3 functions legislative, executive and judiciary, you will be performing one of them.

Ultimately you will make your family proud ๐Ÿ’ฏ and will help society by providing Justice.


In sub ke liye mehnat karna zaroori nahi hai kya? Kuch to eligible bhi nhi h jo h vo kadr kro attempts ki they are valuable, kisi ache UPSC aspirant ko dekhna hardwork kya hota hai pata chalega agar vo bhi na dikhe to kahi pe construction work ho raha hoga waha majdoor sahab ko dekhlena

Kehne ka matlab hai: Don't only collect material but use them, take benefit of opportunities.

@CurrentLegalGK
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ14๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿ’ฏ4๐Ÿ‘1
๐Ÿ˜Ž Seniority appointment of CJI

The Federal Court, which served as the predecessor to the Supreme Court, did not employ the seniority convention. The seniority principle evolved after the death of the first Chief Justice of India, H.J. Kania, when Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru wanted to appoint Justice M.C. Chagla as the Chief Justice of India. Interestingly, Chagla J was then the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court. Six Judges of the Supreme Court threatened to resign if Chagla J was appointed as the CJI instead of Justice Patanjali Shastri, who was the senior-most Judge of the Supreme Court at the time. The Prime Minister eventually appointed Shastri J as the Chief Justice. Since then, it has been a convention that the senior-most Judge of the Court is appointed as the CJI.

๐Ÿ˜ฎ 3 exceptions
1. Justice Gajendragadkar
2. Justice A.N. Ray
3. Justice M.H. Beg
@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘Œ5๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿค2
๐Ÿ”ฅ Reading Material For BNS BNSS and BSA


1. Home Minister's speech (for interpretation)
2. Ready reckoners of the new changes and offences.

๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿคฉ Criminal Manualโ€”
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3413



๐ŸŒŸ Latest Bare Acts- https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1103?single

๐ŸŒŸ Comparative Sections-
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2066

๐ŸŒŸ Bare Acts with comments
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2787

๐ŸŒŸ Summary
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2635
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1165

๐ŸŽ Summary comparisonโ€”
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3300?single



@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘10โค2โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ‘Œ1