24012024_113440.pdf
53.4 KB
Law clerk past year papers.... And notification
๐4
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Law clerk Sample paper @CurrentLegalGK .pdf
๐ฏ
Legal GK Static book if you need just mention the name of the books ๐
We will try not promising as static legal gk is asked almost in every exam .
@CurrentLegalGK
English is a little bit difficult rest is easy.Legal GK Static book if you need just mention the name of the books ๐
We will try not promising as static legal gk is asked almost in every exam .
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ฏ2
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข pinned ยซSupreme court Law Clerk last Year students eligible ๐ 2024 paper https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2491ยป
DAY 16 - Maneka Gandhi vs. UOI_watermark.pdf
1.1 MB
๐ฎ๐ณ DAY 16 - Maneka Gandhi vs. UOI 1978
Procedure established by law, which should be just, fair and reasonable and non-arbitrary
#64_cases
@CurrentLegalGK
Procedure established by law, which should be just, fair and reasonable and non-arbitrary
#64_cases
@CurrentLegalGK
๐6๐ฅ2โก1
๐ฎ๐ณ #Tip
All are great but the observation is simple "People are still using the phrase founding fathers"
Try to Avoid using the phrase Founding Fathers, [Instead Use Founding Members, Founding Persons]
โ Reason --
Apart from marks benefit in your answer it is important to remember 3 facts.
1. Vocabulary has impact on our life that too official statements.
2. We recently saw gender stereotypes vocabulary handbook by S.C.
3. 15 women members in consitutent assembly.
Note: Freedom and development of ideas of constitution was a long process founding fathers were not only those 299 members but the collective spirit of India's History which includes Men as well Women.
Now Don't argue in the comments for he/she.
"เคธเคฎเคเคจเฅ เคตเคพเคฒเฅ เคธเคฎเค เคเค เคเคฐ เคชเคฐเฅเคเฅเคทเคพ เคฎเฅเค เคฆเฅเคธเคฐเฅเค เคชเคฐ เคฌเคขเคผเคค เคฎเคฟเคฒเฅเคเฅ เค เคเคฐ เคเคธเคพ เคนเฅ เคฆเฅเคทเฅเคเคฟเคเฅเคฃ เคฐเคนเคพเฅค"
๐Edit:- Addition (recent evidence) https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/women-contributed-to-drafting-constitution-cji-dy-chandrachud-explains-why-he-wrote-founding-fathers-mothers-of-constitution-218665 (should include both anyhow by using and or person)
@CurrentLegalGK
Saw some messages Today regarding Republic Day Wishes.
All are great but the observation is simple "People are still using the phrase founding fathers"
Try to Avoid using the phrase Founding Fathers, [Instead Use Founding Members, Founding Persons]
โ Reason --
Apart from marks benefit in your answer it is important to remember 3 facts.
1. Vocabulary has impact on our life that too official statements.
2. We recently saw gender stereotypes vocabulary handbook by S.C.
3. 15 women members in consitutent assembly.
Note: Freedom and development of ideas of constitution was a long process founding fathers were not only those 299 members but the collective spirit of India's History which includes Men as well Women.
Now Don't argue in the comments for he/she.
"เคธเคฎเคเคจเฅ เคตเคพเคฒเฅ เคธเคฎเค เคเค เคเคฐ เคชเคฐเฅเคเฅเคทเคพ เคฎเฅเค เคฆเฅเคธเคฐเฅเค เคชเคฐ เคฌเคขเคผเคค เคฎเคฟเคฒเฅเคเฅ เค เคเคฐ เคเคธเคพ เคนเฅ เคฆเฅเคทเฅเคเคฟเคเฅเคฃ เคฐเคนเคพเฅค"
๐Edit:- Addition (recent evidence) https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/women-contributed-to-drafting-constitution-cji-dy-chandrachud-explains-why-he-wrote-founding-fathers-mothers-of-constitution-218665 (should include both anyhow by using and or person)
@CurrentLegalGK
๐6๐ฏ3๐1
Supreme Court: Government-funded minority institutes can't impart religious education: SC
https://m.timesofindia.com/india/supreme-court-ruling-no-religious-education-in-governmentfunded-minority-institutes/articleshow/107125026.cms
https://m.timesofindia.com/india/supreme-court-ruling-no-religious-education-in-governmentfunded-minority-institutes/articleshow/107125026.cms
The Times of India
Supreme Court: Government-funded minority institutes can't impart religious education: SC | India News - Times of India
India News: Read about the Supreme Court ruling that prohibits government-funded minority institutes from imparting religious education. Find out more about the implications and exceptions.
๐2โค1
๐จโ๐ป
โ Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is struck down in its entirety being violative of Article 19(1)(a) and not saved under Article 19(2).
โ Section 69A and the Information Technology (Procedure & Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules 2009 are constitutionally valid.
โ Section 79 is valid subject to Section 79(3)(b) being read down to mean that an intermediary upon receiving actual knowledge from a court order or on being notified by the appropriate government or its agency that unlawful acts relatable to Article 19(2) are going to be committed then fails to expeditiously remove or disable access to such material.
โ Similarly, the Information Technology "Intermediary Guidelines" Rules, 2011 are valid subject to Rule 3 sub-rule (4) being read down in the same manner as indicated in the judgment. (Section 79(3)(b) has to be read down to mean that the intermediary upon receiving actual knowledge that a court order has been passed asking it to expeditiously remove or disable access to certain material must then fail to expeditiously remove or disable access to that material. This is for the reason that otherwise it would be very difficult for intermediaries like Google, Facebook etc. to act when millions of requests are made and the intermediary is then to judge as to which of such requests are legitimate and which are not.
โ We have been informed that in other countries worldwide this view has gained acceptance, Argentina being in the forefront. Also, the Court order and/or the notification by the appropriate Government or its agency must strictly conform to the subject matters laid down in Article 19(2). Unlawful acts beyond what is laid down in Article 19(2) obviously cannot form any part of Section 79.
โ With these two caveats, we refrain from striking down Section 79(3)(b).)
Section 118(d) of the Kerala Police Act is struck down being violative of Article 19(1)(a) and not saved by Article 19(2).
#case_brief
@CurrentLegalGK
The Supreme Court of India in Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India examined the validity of various provisions in Information Technology Act, 2000. โ Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is struck down in its entirety being violative of Article 19(1)(a) and not saved under Article 19(2).
โ Section 69A and the Information Technology (Procedure & Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules 2009 are constitutionally valid.
โ Section 79 is valid subject to Section 79(3)(b) being read down to mean that an intermediary upon receiving actual knowledge from a court order or on being notified by the appropriate government or its agency that unlawful acts relatable to Article 19(2) are going to be committed then fails to expeditiously remove or disable access to such material.
โ Similarly, the Information Technology "Intermediary Guidelines" Rules, 2011 are valid subject to Rule 3 sub-rule (4) being read down in the same manner as indicated in the judgment. (Section 79(3)(b) has to be read down to mean that the intermediary upon receiving actual knowledge that a court order has been passed asking it to expeditiously remove or disable access to certain material must then fail to expeditiously remove or disable access to that material. This is for the reason that otherwise it would be very difficult for intermediaries like Google, Facebook etc. to act when millions of requests are made and the intermediary is then to judge as to which of such requests are legitimate and which are not.
โ We have been informed that in other countries worldwide this view has gained acceptance, Argentina being in the forefront. Also, the Court order and/or the notification by the appropriate Government or its agency must strictly conform to the subject matters laid down in Article 19(2). Unlawful acts beyond what is laid down in Article 19(2) obviously cannot form any part of Section 79.
โ With these two caveats, we refrain from striking down Section 79(3)(b).)
Section 118(d) of the Kerala Police Act is struck down being violative of Article 19(1)(a) and not saved by Article 19(2).
#case_brief
@CurrentLegalGK
๐7๐ฅ3
๐คฉ5๐ฅ4๐1๐1๐1๐ค1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
UGC NET LAW Solved Compilation @CurrentLegalGK.pdf
Around 2500+ Only Law MCQs that too very Important Subjects questions.
๐6๐ฅ1
BCI recommendation on One Nation One Election .pdf
1.1 MB
The Chairman of the Bar Council of India (BCI), Manan Kumar Mishra, has forwarded a detailed set of recommendations to the High-Level Committee on the prospect of "One Nation, One Election" (ONOE). The proposals encompass a spectrum of legal and administrative transformations required for the efficacious implementation of simultaneous elections for central and state governments.
๐Usage- Note these Recommendations and mention them in your One Nation One Election Notes for GS/Essay.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐Usage- Note these Recommendations and mention them in your One Nation One Election Notes for GS/Essay.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐3
๐Bharat Ratna Awardees.
Do you want your image in the Postage Stamp as well?
Then work passionately ๐ฎ๐ณ
@CurrentLegalGK
Do you want your image in the Postage Stamp as well?
Then work passionately ๐ฎ๐ณ
@CurrentLegalGK
โ3๐ซก1
BREAKING| Prevent Genocide In Gaza, Allow Humanitarian Aid : ICJ Directs Israel In South Africa's Application
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/prevent-genocide-in-gaza-allow-humanitarian-aid-icj-directs-israel-in-south-africas-application-247704
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/prevent-genocide-in-gaza-allow-humanitarian-aid-icj-directs-israel-in-south-africas-application-247704
www.livelaw.in
Prevent Genocide Of Palestinians In Gaza, Allow Humanitarian Aid : ICJ Directs Israel In South Africa's Application
TheInternational Court of Justice, ina highly anticipated verdict
๐2๐ฅ1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
BREAKING| Prevent Genocide In Gaza, Allow Humanitarian Aid : ICJ Directs Israel In South Africa's Application https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/prevent-genocide-in-gaza-allow-humanitarian-aid-icj-directs-israel-in-south-africas-application-247704
The Court issued the following provisional measures :
1. By 15 : 2 votes, the Court directed that Israel shall, in accordance with its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in relation to the Palestinians in Gaza, shall take all measures within its powers to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article 2 of the Convention, in particular (a) killing members of the group (b) causing bodily or mental harm to the members of the group (c) deliberately imposing measures on the group deliberately intended to cause the destruction of the group in whole or in part (d) imposing measures to prevent birth within the group.
2. By 15: 2 votes, the State of Israel shall ensure with immediate effect that its military does not commit any acts described above.
3. By 16:1 votes, the State of Israel shall take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide in relation to the members of the Palestinian group in the Gaza strip.
4. By 16:1 votes, the State of Israel shall take immediate and effective measures to ensure the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to address the adverse conditions of life faced by Palestinians in the Gaza strip.
5. The State of Israel shall take effective measures to preserve evidence.
6. Israel must report to the court within a month on what it is doing to uphold the order to take all measures within its power to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza
Justice Dalveer Bhandari, the Indian Judge at the International Court of Justice, has voted in favour of issuing provisional measures against Israel to prevent genocide against Palestinian people living in the Gaza strip. The order was issued in an application filed by South Africa seeking emergent directions to Israel to act as per its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
๐คWrite a short note on International vourt of Justice (200 words)
@CurrentLegalGK
1. By 15 : 2 votes, the Court directed that Israel shall, in accordance with its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in relation to the Palestinians in Gaza, shall take all measures within its powers to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article 2 of the Convention, in particular (a) killing members of the group (b) causing bodily or mental harm to the members of the group (c) deliberately imposing measures on the group deliberately intended to cause the destruction of the group in whole or in part (d) imposing measures to prevent birth within the group.
2. By 15: 2 votes, the State of Israel shall ensure with immediate effect that its military does not commit any acts described above.
3. By 16:1 votes, the State of Israel shall take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide in relation to the members of the Palestinian group in the Gaza strip.
4. By 16:1 votes, the State of Israel shall take immediate and effective measures to ensure the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to address the adverse conditions of life faced by Palestinians in the Gaza strip.
5. The State of Israel shall take effective measures to preserve evidence.
6. Israel must report to the court within a month on what it is doing to uphold the order to take all measures within its power to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza
Justice Dalveer Bhandari, the Indian Judge at the International Court of Justice, has voted in favour of issuing provisional measures against Israel to prevent genocide against Palestinian people living in the Gaza strip. The order was issued in an application filed by South Africa seeking emergent directions to Israel to act as per its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
๐คWrite a short note on International vourt of Justice (200 words)
@CurrentLegalGK
๐2๐1๐ฏ1
๐
โ It is in the first 2 PDFs of this post - https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1839?single
Members Are asking for FORM Link and Notification.โ It is in the first 2 PDFs of this post - https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/1839?single
Telegram
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Law clerk past year papers.... And notification