Latest sample paper of law clerk exam

Notification and link for registration ☝️

@CurrentLegalGK

💯 English is a little bit difficult rest is easy.

Legal GK Static book if you need just mention the name of the books 👇

We will try not promising as static legal gk is asked almost in every exam .

@CurrentLegalGK

🇮🇳 DAY 16 - Maneka Gandhi vs. UOI 1978

Procedure established by law, which should be just, fair and reasonable and non-arbitrary

#64_cases
@CurrentLegalGK

🇮🇳 #Tip

Saw some messages Today regarding Republic Day Wishes.

All are great but the observation is simple "People are still using the phrase founding fathers"

Try to Avoid using the phrase Founding Fathers, [Instead Use Founding Members, Founding Persons]

✅Reason --
Apart from marks benefit in your answer it is important to remember 3 facts.
1. Vocabulary has impact on our life that too official statements.
2. We recently saw gender stereotypes vocabulary handbook by S.C.
3. 15 women members in consitutent assembly.

Note: Freedom and development of ideas of constitution was a long process founding fathers were not only those 299 members but the collective spirit of India's History which includes Men as well Women.

Now Don't argue in the comments for he/she.

"समझने वाले समझ गए और परीक्षा में दूसरों पर बढ़त मिलेगी अगर ऐसा ही दृष्टिकोण रहा।"


📌Edit:- Addition (recent evidence) https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/women-contributed-to-drafting-constitution-cji-dy-chandrachud-explains-why-he-wrote-founding-fathers-mothers-of-constitution-218665 (should include both anyhow by using and or person)

@CurrentLegalGK

Supreme Court: Government-funded minority institutes can't impart religious education: SC
https://m.timesofindia.com/india/supreme-court-ruling-no-religious-education-in-governmentfunded-minority-institutes/articleshow/107125026.cms

👨‍💻 The Supreme Court of India in Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India examined the validity of various provisions in Information Technology Act, 2000.



✅ Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is struck down in its entirety being violative of Article 19(1)(a) and not saved under Article 19(2).
✅Section 69A and the Information Technology (Procedure & Safeguards for Blocking for Access of Information by Public) Rules 2009 are constitutionally valid.
✅Section 79 is valid subject to Section 79(3)(b) being read down to mean that an intermediary upon receiving actual knowledge from a court order or on being notified by the appropriate government or its agency that unlawful acts relatable to Article 19(2) are going to be committed then fails to expeditiously remove or disable access to such material.
✅Similarly, the Information Technology "Intermediary Guidelines" Rules, 2011 are valid subject to Rule 3 sub-rule (4) being read down in the same manner as indicated in the judgment. (Section 79(3)(b) has to be read down to mean that the intermediary upon receiving actual knowledge that a court order has been passed asking it to expeditiously remove or disable access to certain material must then fail to expeditiously remove or disable access to that material. This is for the reason that otherwise it would be very difficult for intermediaries like Google, Facebook etc. to act when millions of requests are made and the intermediary is then to judge as to which of such requests are legitimate and which are not.
✅We have been informed that in other countries worldwide this view has gained acceptance, Argentina being in the forefront. Also, the Court order and/or the notification by the appropriate Government or its agency must strictly conform to the subject matters laid down in Article 19(2). Unlawful acts beyond what is laid down in Article 19(2) obviously cannot form any part of Section 79.
✅With these two caveats, we refrain from striking down Section 79(3)(b).)
Section 118(d) of the Kerala Police Act is struck down being violative of Article 19(1)(a) and not saved by Article 19(2).


#case_brief
@CurrentLegalGK

Around 2500+ Only Law MCQs that too very Important Subjects questions.

The Chairman of the Bar Council of India (BCI), Manan Kumar Mishra, has forwarded a detailed set of recommendations to the High-Level Committee on the prospect of "One Nation, One Election" (ONOE). The proposals encompass a spectrum of legal and administrative transformations required for the efficacious implementation of simultaneous elections for central and state governments.


📌Usage- Note these Recommendations and mention them in your One Nation One Election Notes for GS/Essay.

@CurrentLegalGK

🏅 Civilian Awards 2024....

Mention the brief history of Padma Awards 👇

@CurrentLegalGK

🏆Bharat Ratna Awardees.

Do you want your image in the Postage Stamp as well?

Then work passionately 🇮🇳

@CurrentLegalGK