#POCSO_MCQ
What can be the reasons for a child's interrogation as per the POCSO Act?
a. To establish whether the child needs urgent medical attention
b. To hear the child's version of the circumstances leading to the concern
c. To get a picture of the child's relationship with their parents or family
d. All of the above
β State the section also
What can be the reasons for a child's interrogation as per the POCSO Act?
a. To establish whether the child needs urgent medical attention
b. To hear the child's version of the circumstances leading to the concern
c. To get a picture of the child's relationship with their parents or family
d. All of the above
β State the section also
π₯3π€©1
Bollywood Songs Copyright: Playing Bollywood songs at wedding ceremonies not a copyright infringement, clarifies govt - The Economic Times
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/playing-bollywood-songs-at-wedding-ceremonies-not-a-copyright-infringement-clarifies-govt/articleshow/102162124.cms
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/playing-bollywood-songs-at-wedding-ceremonies-not-a-copyright-infringement-clarifies-govt/articleshow/102162124.cms
The Economic Times
Playing Bollywood songs at wedding ceremonies not a copyright infringement, clarifies govt
The government has clarified that playing Bollywood music at weddings and associated festivities will not lead to copyright infringement action. The Copyright Act of 1957 had previously determined that music was legally permissible to play at such functionsβ¦
β€βπ₯1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Bollywood Songs Copyright: Playing Bollywood songs at wedding ceremonies not a copyright infringement, clarifies govt - The Economic Times https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/playing-bollywood-songs-at-wedding-ceremonies-not-a-copyright-infringementβ¦
According to section 52 (1) (za) of the Copyright Act, playing a literary, dramatic, or musical work or communicating it to the public during a genuine religious or official ceremony by the central/state government or any local authority does not infringe copyright. This includes marriage processions and social festivities associated with weddings, which are regarded as religious ceremonies under this clause.
π₯1π1
2023 Judgments MCQ by @CurrentLegalGK
In which case did the Supreme Court rule that the conviction of the accused under Section 498A of the IPC can be upheld despite acquittal under Section 304B?
In which case did the Supreme Court rule that the conviction of the accused under Section 498A of the IPC can be upheld despite acquittal under Section 304B?
Anonymous Quiz
35%
Pradeep Mehra V. Harijivan J. Jethwa 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 936
29%
Munilakshmi v. Narendra Babu 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 924
27%
Paranagouda v. State of Karnataka, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 915
9%
M.A Biviji v. Sunita & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 931
π8π₯1
π
RK TARUN v. UOI 2022
#sexual_harrasment
#cognizable #non_bailable
@CurrentLegalGK
Classification of section 12 POCSORK TARUN v. UOI 2022
#sexual_harrasment
#cognizable #non_bailable
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π₯2
π
Laxman naskar v. UOI, 2000
Do you know Any other case???
@CurrentLegalGK
Guidelines for remission of convictsLaxman naskar v. UOI, 2000
Do you know Any other case???
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π₯1π1
Bilkis Bano Convicts Remission: βReform Is an Opportunity, Not a Rightβ, SC Told
https://thewire.in/law/bilkis-bano-convicts-remission-supreme-court-reserve-order
https://thewire.in/law/bilkis-bano-convicts-remission-supreme-court-reserve-order
The Wire
Bilkis Bano Convicts Remission: βReform Is an Opportunity, Not a Rightβ, SC Told
The division bench of the Supreme Court has reserved its judgment in the pleas against remission granted by the Gujarat government to 11 convicts sentenced to life imprisonment for crimes committed during the 2002 Gujarat pogrom.
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Bilkis Bano Convicts Remission: βReform Is an Opportunity, Not a Rightβ, SC Told https://thewire.in/law/bilkis-bano-convicts-remission-supreme-court-reserve-order
Which was the first case when it was held that ex post facto law principle will not apply to procedural laws.
#question
@CurrentLegalGK
#question
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π1
π
ββRecent case- Rabi Saha @ Sarkar v. State of West Bengal 2023 {Attempt to Rape}
@CurrentLegalGK
Attempt v Preparation in Rape offencesββRecent case- Rabi Saha @ Sarkar v. State of West Bengal 2023 {Attempt to Rape}
β..asking the victim to remove her pant and in defiance the appellant himself removing it justifiably signifies an attempt to commit the offence of rape. The action of removing the undergarment of the victim covering and protecting her private parts and forcibly made her lie down on the ground cannot be for any other oblique reason but indubitably for the purpose of ravishing herβ
@CurrentLegalGK
β€βπ₯3π€2π1π«‘1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π Attempt v Preparation in Rape offences ββRecent case- Rabi Saha @ Sarkar v. State of West Bengal 2023 {Attempt to Rape} β..asking the victim to remove her pant and in defiance the appellant himself removing it justifiably signifies an attempt to commitβ¦
Use these quotes in your mains answer writing especially in UP and Bihar.
β3π₯2π1
BNS section 69 π Deceitful means OR false promise to marry#Questionβ
Deceitful consent is a consent? If No then how this section is distinguishable from Rape in this context of Consent/will in section 69 and Rape offence?
#Section_69_of_BNS
@CurrentLegalGK
π€―3
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
BNS section 69 π Deceitful means OR false promise to marry #Questionβ Deceitful consent is a consent? If No then how this section is distinguishable from Rape in this context of Consent/will in section 69 and Rape offence? #Section_69_of_BNS @CurrentLegalGK
π§ π€
We will be sharing the details of new criminal acts one by one in a summary manner Next Year but for now answer this easy Question βοΈ
π€©3π1π€1
π Two Conflicting Judgments on Bail and Presumption of Guilt under section 29 of POCSO by J&K and Delhi High CourtπWhich is Correct According to youβ pre trial or post trial
@CurrentLegalGK
π6β1
#POCSO_MCQ By @CurrentLegalGK
The Accused have to rebut the presumption under section 29 of POCSO Act, 2012 by______.
The Accused have to rebut the presumption under section 29 of POCSO Act, 2012 by______.
Anonymous Quiz
44%
Beyond reasonable doubt
20%
Preponderance of probablity
12%
By establishing foundational facts which does not constitute offence.
24%
Preponderance of probablity after prosecution has proved foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt
β€βπ₯1π1π₯1π€©1
π₯3π1
UGC LAW PAPERS COMPILED @CurrentLegalGK.pdf
11.4 MB
ποΈ
βSolve these Law MCQs ASAP
@CurrentLegalGK
UGC NET JRF PAST YEAR PAPERS COMPILATION TILL 2021
βSolve these Law MCQs ASAP
@CurrentLegalGK
π€©3π1