Open Ai
Photo
It's interesting how all these new AI model releases are now comparing benchmarks with Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4
This is how far ahead Opus 4.7 and GPT 5.5 are from the competition today.
This is how far ahead Opus 4.7 and GPT 5.5 are from the competition today.
👾38
JUST NOW: Google announces it will invest up to $40 billion in Anthropic, its largest single AI investment ever.
Important details:
Important details:
1: Google initially commits to $10 billion in cash upfront as part of the deal
2: Google can invest up to $30 billion more in Anthropic if performance targets are hit, bringing the total potential commitment to $40 billion
3: Google will supply Anthropic with at least 5 gigawatts of computing power to support AI development
4: SoftBank is separately planning to invest up to $40 billion in Anthropic as well, meaning Anthropic could receive $80 billion in combined commitments from two investors alone
The AI infrastructure race is accelerating.
Two of the world’s largest investors are now betting $80 billion combined on a single AI company.
👾46❤1
JUST IN: State Department launches global campaign targeting DeepSeek over alleged theft from American AI labs.
👾39
JUST IN: Apple’s base M4 Mac Mini is sold out in the U.S., with some other models facing month-long waits.
👾31
everyone is sleeping on NotebookLM...
this thing is literally the best option for:
- building a custom AI trained on whatever topic you need (content creation, copywriting, automations...)
- learning complex topics, studying at any level
- understanding RAG, working with large files from any source
plus it's powered by a model that was clearly designed for these use cases
this thing is literally the best option for:
- building a custom AI trained on whatever topic you need (content creation, copywriting, automations...)
- learning complex topics, studying at any level
- understanding RAG, working with large files from any source
plus it's powered by a model that was clearly designed for these use cases
👾48
According to Breaking Defense, the Department of Defense is using GenAI.mil, a Google Gemini-powered platform that lets Pentagon staff build custom AI agents for routine work on unclassified systems.
What these AI agents are doing:
• Drafting after-action reports
• Writing staff estimates for operations
• Automating paperwork and workflows
• Handling data-heavy admin tasks
• Assisting non-technical personnel with custom tools
This is one of the clearest signs yet that governments are moving from testing AI to deploying AI at scale. Instead of waiting for engineers, everyday Pentagon workers can now “vibe code” their own assistants using natural language.
That means millions of military and civilian employees could eventually build internal software themselves.
Source.
@CoreAti
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👾44❤3
Jeff Bezos has his own AI startup called Project Prometheus that's already valued at $38 billion despite being founded 5 months ago.
It's focused on using AI for physical tasks like manufacturing and engineering instead of chatbots.
It's focused on using AI for physical tasks like manufacturing and engineering instead of chatbots.
👾49
🚨MUSK DROPS FRAUD CLAIMS AGAINST ALTMAN - TRIAL SHIFTS FROM JURY TO JUDGE
Elon Musk's lawsuit against Altman and OpenAI had four claims going to trial:
1. Breach of charitable trust
2. Unjust enrichment
3. Promissory fraud
4. Constructive fraud
On Friday, Elon Musk's lawyers asked Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to dismiss promissory fraud and constructive fraud claims.
She approved the same day.
What's left is breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment.
Most news coverage has read this as a retreat. It is closer to the opposite:
>Fraud is a Jury question
>Charitable trust is a Judge question
What this means is the Judge decides this case alone.
Not the Jury. Their role now is advisory only, meaning their verdict is non-binding.
This is the same judge who already cited Brockman's 2017 diary — "it was a lie" — in her own ruling denying OpenAI's summary judgment.
Elon Musk's case just got stronger. He moved it from a jury he can't predict to a judge who already showed her hand.
That is a different trial than the one being covered in mainstream headlines.
This trial is now about whether a federal judge will use charitable-trust authority and donor-standing precedent to get Sam Altman removed as CEO and unwind the nonprofit-to-for-profit conversion that California Attorney General approved six months ago.
@CoreAti
Elon Musk's lawsuit against Altman and OpenAI had four claims going to trial:
1. Breach of charitable trust
2. Unjust enrichment
3. Promissory fraud
4. Constructive fraud
On Friday, Elon Musk's lawyers asked Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to dismiss promissory fraud and constructive fraud claims.
She approved the same day.
What's left is breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment.
Most news coverage has read this as a retreat. It is closer to the opposite:
>Fraud is a Jury question
>Charitable trust is a Judge question
What this means is the Judge decides this case alone.
Not the Jury. Their role now is advisory only, meaning their verdict is non-binding.
This is the same judge who already cited Brockman's 2017 diary — "it was a lie" — in her own ruling denying OpenAI's summary judgment.
Elon Musk's case just got stronger. He moved it from a jury he can't predict to a judge who already showed her hand.
That is a different trial than the one being covered in mainstream headlines.
This trial is now about whether a federal judge will use charitable-trust authority and donor-standing precedent to get Sam Altman removed as CEO and unwind the nonprofit-to-for-profit conversion that California Attorney General approved six months ago.
@CoreAti
👾44
Project Deal: Anthropic created an internal marketplace where all transactions on behalf of people were carried out by Claude agents
Previously, they already conducted the Project Vend experiment, when an agent operated a small vending machine (more details). Now, Anthropic wants to understand how close we are to entire markets with many seller-agents and buyer-agents.
69 employees participated in the project. Each of them was given a personal agent and a budget of 100 dollars. The agents received instructions from the owners: what a person would like to buy and sell, for how much, whether a bargain is appropriate, etc.
After receiving the instructions, the agents went completely autonomously to live on the marketplace and spend/earn money.
As a result, the agents concluded 186 transactions for 500 products in a short period of time, with the total amount of transactions exceeding $4000. Incidentally, the employees later actually brought things and exchanged them in the office.
It turned out that the quality of the model directly affects its ability to bargain. Opus, on average, concluded about two more transactions than Haiku, sold the same products at a higher price, and as a buyer, paid less. For example, the same broken folding bicycle was sold by Haiku for $38, and by Opus for $65.
Of course, there were also funny moments. One employee allowed Claude to buy a gift for himself, and the agent chose 19 ping pong balls for $3, calling them "spherical orbs of opportunities". Another agent suddenly sold not an item, but a day with a colleague's dog (the people actually arranged it later, as the money had already been paid).
www.anthropic.com/features/project-deal
Previously, they already conducted the Project Vend experiment, when an agent operated a small vending machine (more details). Now, Anthropic wants to understand how close we are to entire markets with many seller-agents and buyer-agents.
69 employees participated in the project. Each of them was given a personal agent and a budget of 100 dollars. The agents received instructions from the owners: what a person would like to buy and sell, for how much, whether a bargain is appropriate, etc.
After receiving the instructions, the agents went completely autonomously to live on the marketplace and spend/earn money.
As a result, the agents concluded 186 transactions for 500 products in a short period of time, with the total amount of transactions exceeding $4000. Incidentally, the employees later actually brought things and exchanged them in the office.
It turned out that the quality of the model directly affects its ability to bargain. Opus, on average, concluded about two more transactions than Haiku, sold the same products at a higher price, and as a buyer, paid less. For example, the same broken folding bicycle was sold by Haiku for $38, and by Opus for $65.
Of course, there were also funny moments. One employee allowed Claude to buy a gift for himself, and the agent chose 19 ping pong balls for $3, calling them "spherical orbs of opportunities". Another agent suddenly sold not an item, but a day with a colleague's dog (the people actually arranged it later, as the money had already been paid).
www.anthropic.com/features/project-deal
👾45🤔3❤2
Core Ai News
BREAKING 🚨: Manus AI got acquired by Meta.😽 📱 “We’re excited about what the future holds with Meta and Manus working together and we will continue to iterate the product and serve users that have defined Manus from the beginning.”
🚨 IT'S OVER!!!
Meta’s $2 billion Manus acquisition blocked by China.
On April 27, 2026, China’s National Development and Reform Commission blocked Meta AI’s acquisition of AI startup Manus, ordering all parties to cancel the deal.
Meta’s $2 billion Manus acquisition blocked by China.
On April 27, 2026, China’s National Development and Reform Commission blocked Meta AI’s acquisition of AI startup Manus, ordering all parties to cancel the deal.
👾48
OpenAI 👀 Microsoft
OpenAI and Microsoft have published an amendment to their partnership allowing OpenAI to host their models via other cloud providers.
Microsoft also won’t be paying revenue share to OpenAI after 2030.
More freedom to OpenAI!
OpenAI and Microsoft have published an amendment to their partnership allowing OpenAI to host their models via other cloud providers.
Microsoft also won’t be paying revenue share to OpenAI after 2030.
More freedom to OpenAI!
👾45
🚨 OpenAI is reportedly building a phone designed to replace the iPhone.
And it’s further along than anyone realized.
Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, the same man who predicted every major Apple product cycle for 20 years, just dropped this.
Important details:
1: OpenAI is partnering with Qualcomm AND MediaTek to develop custom smartphone processors, not one chip partner, but two competing giants simultaneously
2: Luxshare has been named the exclusive system co-design and manufacturing partner, the same company that assembles Apple products
3: Mass production is targeted for 2028, the hardware roadmap is already in motion
4: The phone will run OpenAI’s own OS, replacing traditional apps entirely with AI agents that complete tasks autonomously, without you ever opening a single app
5: The processor is being designed around on-device AI performance, with complex tasks offloaded to OpenAI’s cloud infrastructure for seamless integration
6: OpenAI’s core thesis: users don’t want apps, they want results. The phone will continuously understand context, habits, and preferences in real time
This isn’t a gadget. It’s a direct attempt to replace the operating system layer that Apple and Google have owned for 20 years.
I’m doing more research, and what I’m about to post will blow your mind.
You’ll wish you followed me sooner, trust me.
And it’s further along than anyone realized.
Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, the same man who predicted every major Apple product cycle for 20 years, just dropped this.
Important details:
1: OpenAI is partnering with Qualcomm AND MediaTek to develop custom smartphone processors, not one chip partner, but two competing giants simultaneously
2: Luxshare has been named the exclusive system co-design and manufacturing partner, the same company that assembles Apple products
3: Mass production is targeted for 2028, the hardware roadmap is already in motion
4: The phone will run OpenAI’s own OS, replacing traditional apps entirely with AI agents that complete tasks autonomously, without you ever opening a single app
5: The processor is being designed around on-device AI performance, with complex tasks offloaded to OpenAI’s cloud infrastructure for seamless integration
6: OpenAI’s core thesis: users don’t want apps, they want results. The phone will continuously understand context, habits, and preferences in real time
This isn’t a gadget. It’s a direct attempt to replace the operating system layer that Apple and Google have owned for 20 years.
I’m doing more research, and what I’m about to post will blow your mind.
You’ll wish you followed me sooner, trust me.
👾46❤1👍1
Core Ai News
Photo
Be Mark Zuckerberg:
> learn Mandarin
> give speeches in Mandarin in China
> put Xi Jinping’s book on your desk
> get employees to read Xi Jinping’s book
> ask Xi Jinping to name your baby
> get rejected
> host Chinese internet officials at Facebook
> try to bring Facebook back to China
> get rejected
> explore China-friendly censorship tools
> get rejected
> quietly test a China-only app
> get rejected
> buy an AI company with Chinese roots
> get rejected by China again
> learn Mandarin
> give speeches in Mandarin in China
> put Xi Jinping’s book on your desk
> get employees to read Xi Jinping’s book
> ask Xi Jinping to name your baby
> get rejected
> host Chinese internet officials at Facebook
> try to bring Facebook back to China
> get rejected
> explore China-friendly censorship tools
> get rejected
> quietly test a China-only app
> get rejected
> buy an AI company with Chinese roots
> get rejected by China again
👾43🤣8❤2
Core Ai News
🚨MUSK DROPS FRAUD CLAIMS AGAINST ALTMAN - TRIAL SHIFTS FROM JURY TO JUDGE Elon Musk's lawsuit against Altman and OpenAI had four claims going to trial: 1. Breach of charitable trust 2. Unjust enrichment 3. Promissory fraud 4. Constructive fraud On Friday…
Let's breakdown what's happening between Elon musk and sam altman
Background:
- OpenAI founded in 2015 as non-profit by elon Musk, sam Altman, and others.
- Musk gave ~$38 million as donation.
- Goal was to Develop safe AI for the benefit of all humanity (not for profit).
- Musk left the board in 2018 after disagreements.
- After Musk left
- OpenAI created a for-profit subsidiary (capped-profit at first)
- raised billions from Microsoft, launched ChatGPT (huge success), and grew massively valuable.
- OpenAI fully restructures into a for-profit public benefit corporation (still overseen by the non-profit arm).
Now:
- Elon Musk says Sam Altman of betrays OpenAI’s original non-profit mission by turning it into a for-profit company.
- File a Lawsuit targets Altman, Greg Brockman, OpenAI, and Microsoft.
- Said to Reverse the for-profit restructuring and make OpenAI a pure non-profit again.
- Allegations: breach of contract, fraud, unjust enrichment.
- Musk’s Demands to Remove Altman and Brockman.
What OpenAI / Altman Say in Their Defense
- Musk agreed in 2017 that a for-profit structure was needed.
- Musk is “motivated by jealousy” and regret for leaving.
- Musk’s $38 million was a donation, not an investment (no ownership rights).
- The lawsuit is baseless harassment.
Current Status:
- Trial just started today in federal court in Oakland, California.
- Jury selection today, opening arguments soon.
- Expected to last 2–3 weeks
- OpenAI is still moving forward with its for-profit plans and IPO.
- Expected to go public later in 2026 at ~$1 trillion valuation.
Who is right here ?
Background:
- OpenAI founded in 2015 as non-profit by elon Musk, sam Altman, and others.
- Musk gave ~$38 million as donation.
- Goal was to Develop safe AI for the benefit of all humanity (not for profit).
- Musk left the board in 2018 after disagreements.
- After Musk left
- OpenAI created a for-profit subsidiary (capped-profit at first)
- raised billions from Microsoft, launched ChatGPT (huge success), and grew massively valuable.
- OpenAI fully restructures into a for-profit public benefit corporation (still overseen by the non-profit arm).
Now:
- Elon Musk says Sam Altman of betrays OpenAI’s original non-profit mission by turning it into a for-profit company.
- File a Lawsuit targets Altman, Greg Brockman, OpenAI, and Microsoft.
- Said to Reverse the for-profit restructuring and make OpenAI a pure non-profit again.
- Allegations: breach of contract, fraud, unjust enrichment.
- Musk’s Demands to Remove Altman and Brockman.
What OpenAI / Altman Say in Their Defense
- Musk agreed in 2017 that a for-profit structure was needed.
- Musk is “motivated by jealousy” and regret for leaving.
- Musk’s $38 million was a donation, not an investment (no ownership rights).
- The lawsuit is baseless harassment.
Current Status:
- Trial just started today in federal court in Oakland, California.
- Jury selection today, opening arguments soon.
- Expected to last 2–3 weeks
- OpenAI is still moving forward with its for-profit plans and IPO.
- Expected to go public later in 2026 at ~$1 trillion valuation.
Who is right here ?
👾43