The New York Times is on the attack vs. Raw Milk

Wait until you see the "health expert" they're quoting for this article.

"Dr. Martin said, certain vitamins are only reduced by around less than 10 percent. “The claim that these components are ‘destroyed’ by pasteurization is simply untrue"

Martin is a misdirecting dumb shit

The argument by raw milk proponents doesn't center around vitamins, it's that beneficial enzymes and microbes are killed by the pasteurization process, which all of them are. They can't survive the heating process.

If you get raw milk from a nasty farm, sure, there could be a higher risk for contamination - but raw milk from a clean farm is going to be far better than pasteurized milk from a shitty corporate confined farm.

The only kind of cows milk I drink is raw. These "health experts" can suck it.