These ppl really are stupid. Russian’s low death count, after launching that large of an attack, is representative of how precise Russian’s weaponry is and not a flaw as the NYT idiots believe https://t.me/Jack_Posobiec/17294

The Governor of Nikolaev actually said this

Now they're going after this Mexican restaurant in California for posting a picture with Mike Lindell

They LOCO GRANDE!

Support Mike: http://mypillow.com/poso

They are still pushing the vaccine!

The FBI was offering $1 Million for dirt on Trump before he was even elected. Not a good look for all the 'conservative influencers' who defended the deep state agencies all these years! I hear there's even someone who wears a CIA pin on TV - yuck!

Russia adds Zuckerberg's Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, to the list of "terrorist and extremist organizations," state media reports.

@WeTheMedia

"Fake News" article: https://www.vice.com/en/article/ake44z/elon-musk-vladimir-putin-ukraine

Twatter link: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1579879154463690752?s=20&t=yByfQxSbqS9urNvnho0L2w

This exchange between Durham and Danchenko’s defense reveals quite a lot.

Danchenko’s defense are trying to play the ‘plausible deniability’ game, pretending like Danchenko was not wittingly involved in any sort of conspiracy with the FBI to frame Trump.

Durham nips that in the bud and shuts down their defense by declaring “there was no misunderstanding”.

Danchenko’s defense are already caught acting shady, and Durham confirms that he found cooperation/coordination.

-Clandestine

NEW: During questioning from Special Counsel John Durham, Brian Auten, a supervisory counter intelligence analyst with the FBI, revealed the FBI offered Christopher Steele $1M if he could corroborate allegations in the Dossier, but Steele could not do so

Auten admitted under questioning from Durham that the FBI never got corroboration of the information in the Steele Dossier but still used it in the initial FISA application and in the three subsequent renewals

🔗 Sean Langille, Fox News

If this offer a $1 million payment was after, why the hell would they be offering Steele a million dollars to verify what his dossier claims when they'd already used the dossier to get a FISA warrant?

The FBI was already supposed to have all their ducks in a row and verified the allegations before using them in a surveillance warrant.

The FBI offering a $1 million payment to Christopher Steele to verify his own dossier after the FBI had already used it to get a surveillance warrant of the Trump campaign is today's bombshell.

For FIVE YEARS this offer by the FBI of a payment to Steele to verify his own fricken' dossier never leaked.

The judge overseeing today's request by the DOJ to prevent Trump's special master review of materials seized in the FBI attack...

None other than Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.


I wonder if attacking him repeatedly over the course of a year will backfire on Trump's enemies?

I vividly remember receiving flak from the community for pointing out that Tulsi on our side.

She was the ONLY politician to speak out on the reality of US funded biolabs in Ukraine.

She just called the Dems a “warmongering cabal”.

Hell she guest-hosted Tucker 😂

Tulsi may have had a D next to her name this whole time, but she was echoing pro-Trump narratives the ENTIRE TIME.

The timing of this flip is 100% to maximize damage to the DNC before the midterms.

Double agents go both ways.

-Clandestine

https://youtu.be/H4Z1x8Ou8VU

Folks, I see so many people in the community use the word "trust".

As in you don't "trust" Elon, or don't "trust" Tulsi, etc.

Who said anything about "trusting" anyone? And what is it you are "trusting" them with, exactly?

I am merely pointing out realities. And the reality is, characters like Elon and Tulsi have been pulverizing our enemies, and appear to be doing so DELIBERATELY.

Tulsi is swinging centrist voters red, and providing headlines and narratives beneficial to us, leading up to the midterms.

She's an ally. That does not mean that I “trust” her, or anyone for that matter.

I’m merely observing who’s actions are benefiting us, and recognizing trends.

And let’s say, theoretically, one was to “trust” Tulsi, or Elon, or Trump, and it turns out they were actually Deep State rat like many of you all claim.

What would you have lost from putting your “trust” in them? What would you have gained? Absolutely nothing either way.

We are all completely powerless bystanders when it comes to the events that are unfolding. NCSWIC is not just a catch phrase, it means NOTHING can stop what is coming, and that includes the high improbability that Tulsi is a Deep State agent looking gain your “trust”.

All we can do is point out what is actually happening, and what is actually happening is Tulsi just dealt a well-timed, calculated blow to the DNC before the midterms, with time for the media cycle to influence centrist voters, and is doing so by rightfully calling the Biden regime a “warmongering cabal” and denouncing pushing us into proxy wars and pushing us into nuclear destruction, etc.

This situation is the same as you being jumped on the streets, and some stranger jumps in and throws a haymaker to one of the guys jumping you.

You don’t know this guy, but he just punched your assailant right in the face. You don’t necessarily “trust” him, but he just showed you he’s on your side by defending you. If he wasn’t on your side, he would have punched you instead. Or left you to get beaten.

If Tulsi wanted to deal damage to Trump/MAGA before the midterms, she would have done so. She also could have just remained silent. But instead, she intentionally inflicted damage to Biden and the Dems. And she’s been doing so rather consistently for years now.

If her dealing massive damage to the Dems before the most important election in history, is just a ruse to trick you into “trusting” her… well I’d say we win that exchange 😂

-Clandestine