Watch carefully for them slow walking HR1 because the closer it passes to the 2022 elections, the more likely they will be able to abuse the new “rules”.

Did some group use the ballots that were “returned to sender”?

If you are interested in discussing the Maricopa audit in real time, there are plenty of Telegram chat rooms setup for that purpose.

Example:
https://t.me/AZAuditChat

Dems fighting election audits to prevent undermining voter confidence is in itself an admission of guilt.

Think about it. 😂

Seems other counties under threat of audit are trying to pull the same legal stall tactics.
Walls closing in...

If you want more information about dead, or phantom, voters, please head over to @BobbyPiton’s channel for more information.

Reminder:
Maricopa county is still stonewalling access to the election routers.
The same routers that were confirmed to be connected to at least 50 other networks.

Could someone have hacked the election via the router?
Could they have man-in-the-middle attacked the election through one of the 50 networks connected to the same router?

What is HAMMER AND SCORECARD?

Recall back to last winter.
I hypothesized that whoever controls the ballot making software would be able to make changes to the ballots in discrete ways to force a vote for a specific candidate.
Interestingly enough, it seems my hypothesis is on the brink of being proven true.

I wonder what RUNBECK did with all the ballots they mailed out that were returned to sender.....

I wonder if RUNBECK ran the anonymous ballot drop boxes.....

Have the auditors found the county settings which the scanners use to automatically decide which ballots have anomalies and which don’t?
Properly setting the anomaly threshold is the responsibility of the county.
It is possible to make almost every ballot automatically trigger the anomaly threshold and get sent to digital adjudication.
Counties with abnormally high rates of digital adjudication were probably configured incorrectly by local county officials.

Remember when the Indian scientists were bullied into retracting their research linking Sars-Cov-2 to HIV?

I’m not involved in 8kun administration anymore but lots of people are asking me to weigh in on “B”.
The way the /projectdcomms/ board is setup, only the board owner is able to post on it.
Logging in as board owner requires a username and password.
The person who posted as B had logged into the board with the correct board credentials.

I see a few POSSIBILITIES about what happened.

1. The board could have been claimed and given to someone new. This can be checked by logging into the admin account and checking the board claims log. I dont have access to the admin account so i can’t check that.

2. Someone GUESSED the board owner username and password, then logged in and posted as B.

3. The original Q gave the username and password credentials to someone else to post on the board with.

4. It’s actually Q posting.

If i had to guess, i would guess it is either #3 or #4, but i am not in a position to technically verify that now.

After a bit of thinking, I realized that there is one more way to post on a locked board/thread.

- It is possible for a global volunteer to post on a locked board or thread. So there is a possibility that B is just a global volunteer for 8kun.

When I was admin of 8kun, there was no global volunteer who went by the handle B, so he would have been someone who took the role after i left the project.

Im not saying this is what happened, but it is a possibility to add to the list of possibilities i posted earlier.

An 8kun “Global Volunteer” posting on the /projectdcomms/ board as B is now my top guess as to what happened.
I dont know it for a fact, but it makes the most sense given the information available.

If you want more information about “B”, please watch this video:
https://tv.gab.com/channel/jimwatkins/view/b-update-60b3b5c555e0c6ea8421466c

I rarely look at CNN, but it seems Jenna Ellis is a Never Trumper who managed to subvert the Trump campaign to the highest levels.
https://archive.is/OBb8V