That was a quick plug for AlienLeaks.
Think wikileaks, but aliens instead of clinton emails.

From now, I will keep the alien disclosure talk to this channel: https://t.me/alienleaks

Have a good day everyone.

Interesting how HR1 would try to establish federal guidelines for state elections when the Supreme Court has already told the feds to stay out of state election business.

Interesting how HR1 would make legal many of the issues that the auditors are allegedly digging up.

Interesting how HR1 would prevent anybody from questioning any future election.

Luckily we have a constitution that is supposed to protect citizens from legislature that seeks to censor free speech.

Public confidence in the Supreme Court to rule on the side of the Constitution is very low.

Since Supreme Court cases can sometimes take extended lengths to resolve, it is possible that HR1 would be in effect for the 2022 election unless some kind of emergency injunction is filed and accepted.

Watch carefully for them slow walking HR1 because the closer it passes to the 2022 elections, the more likely they will be able to abuse the new “rules”.

Did some group use the ballots that were “returned to sender”?

If you are interested in discussing the Maricopa audit in real time, there are plenty of Telegram chat rooms setup for that purpose.

Example:
https://t.me/AZAuditChat

Dems fighting election audits to prevent undermining voter confidence is in itself an admission of guilt.

Think about it. 😂

Seems other counties under threat of audit are trying to pull the same legal stall tactics.
Walls closing in...

If you want more information about dead, or phantom, voters, please head over to @BobbyPiton’s channel for more information.

Reminder:
Maricopa county is still stonewalling access to the election routers.
The same routers that were confirmed to be connected to at least 50 other networks.

Could someone have hacked the election via the router?
Could they have man-in-the-middle attacked the election through one of the 50 networks connected to the same router?

What is HAMMER AND SCORECARD?

Recall back to last winter.
I hypothesized that whoever controls the ballot making software would be able to make changes to the ballots in discrete ways to force a vote for a specific candidate.
Interestingly enough, it seems my hypothesis is on the brink of being proven true.

I wonder what RUNBECK did with all the ballots they mailed out that were returned to sender.....

I wonder if RUNBECK ran the anonymous ballot drop boxes.....

Have the auditors found the county settings which the scanners use to automatically decide which ballots have anomalies and which don’t?
Properly setting the anomaly threshold is the responsibility of the county.
It is possible to make almost every ballot automatically trigger the anomaly threshold and get sent to digital adjudication.
Counties with abnormally high rates of digital adjudication were probably configured incorrectly by local county officials.

Remember when the Indian scientists were bullied into retracting their research linking Sars-Cov-2 to HIV?