Who printed the mail in ballots?
Who sent out the mail-in ballots?
What happened to the mail-in ballots that were RETURNED TO SENDER???
Were returned ballots ultimately used?
If so, who used them?

Are you a voter?
You need to start calling around and asking questions.
Here are some starter questions that you should know the answers to:

Who processes my voter registration?
Who stores my vote and who has access to my voting history on the database?
Who prints the ballots?
Who mails them?
Who receives them?
Who are they tied to?
Who funds who?

They are refusing to meet with the Senate for the hearing on Tuesday and they are doing a press conference on Monday.
They don’t have logic, proof, the law, or God on their side, so now they will focus all their efforts on trying to discredit the audit and auditors.
They are panicked because they know what the auditors likely already have.
Like a cornered dog, they lash out.

If the election was held honestly, why are they fighting so hard to stop the audit?

We must stand up against their lies.

What we now know:

Runbeck printed mail-in ballots.
Runbeck gave mail-in ballots to USPS to deliver.
Runbeck received mail-in ballots.
Runbeck sorted received ballots - 40k per hour.
Runbeck has been partnered with Dominion.
Runbeck has been partnered with Maricopa County.
Runbeck was allegedly caught sending pallets of fake ballots to Fulton County, Georgia.
Runbeck was allegedly caught printing ballots with a ~30% error rate for Tarrant County, Texas.

What we don’t know:

1. Who received the mail-in ballots marked RETURN TO SENDER?

2. Were the mail-in ballots marked RETURN TO SENDER sorted away from the mail-in ballots which were filled out normally?

3. Were the mail-in ballots marked RETURN TO SENDER eventually filled out by the sender then dropped into the anonymous ballot drop boxes with no chain of custody?

If you are planning to attend the Maricopa County Supervisors Press Conference on Monday, please ask them to answer these questions.

Why does Google show the RUNBECK website selling viagra and cialis?

Do you trust an election vendor that appears to be selling VIAGRA?

I can think of two possibilities why RUNBECK appears to be selling Viagra and Cialis.

1. They were hacked.

2. They are simply selling Viagra and Cialis.

Regarding point 1, RUNBECK boasts on their website of offering the highest level of cyber security guidance, security, training, and support.
If they are professionals at cyber security, their website simply being hacked is hard to believe.

Regarding point 2, the subdomain http://old.runbeck. net (url broken on purpose to prevent clicking) seems to be selling Viagra and Cialis to the “old” demographic which appears to have been identified as being potential customers of Viagra and Cialis.

Runbeck’s ftp server is on clearnet and returned as a google search result.
Dont go to that link. It is easy to hack an ftp setup like that, and you don’t want to be targeted just because you clicked on a google search result.

Interesting document describing RUNBECK’s plan to bring mail-in voting to the masses.

Document includes plans to change laws/rules and information about setting up SORTING EQUIPMENT FOR jurisdictions expecting more than 75,000 RETURNED BALLOTS.

https://runbeck.net/wp-content/uploads/Election-Center-VBM-Timeline.pdf

Interestingly, RUNBECK made plans for ballot drop boxes.

Were any anonymous ballot drop boxes run by RUNBECK?

How to steal your vote using a mail-in ballot:

1. Mail-in ballot sent to you by vendor.
2. You arent home, or ballot sent to wrong address, and the ballot is RETURNED TO SENDER (vendor).
3. Vendor fills in ballot on your behalf.
4. Vendor puts your now-filled-in ballot into anonymous ballot drop-box that it also operates.
5. Congratulations, you voted for whoever the vendor of your ballot wants.

Question: @CodeMonkeyZ recently asked, Who printed Arizona’s mail-in ballots?

Answer: Runbeck Election Services printed ALL of the ballots in Arizona. They also mailed ALL of the ballots in Arizona.

@VoteLizHarris and @GailGolec brought this to our attention in mid April in a video that has since been deleted by YouTube (view the summary post).

Runbeck was also mentioned in Jan Bryant’s testimony at the Arizona hearing in November. Bryant testified that Runbeck was scanning the ballots and delivered them to the Maricopa Election & Tabulation Center for 7 days following the election.

Watch @CannCon:🔗 Jan Bryant Video

AZ audit liaison Ken Bennett has said that “subpoenaing Runbeck will be a natural extension of the audit.”
————

If you have a moment today, please go through and use archive.org or archive.today to archive the tweets from this twitter account:

https://twitter.com/runbeckelection

Thanks

Last October, RUNBECK knew Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin would be election hotspots.