They are not lifting fingerprints, but a lack of fingerprints might be a sign of a ballot that was not marked by a human.

UV light is able to detect fingerprints. I talked with Bobby Piton and we discussed whether the audit team may be looking for fingerprints or not. It was our conclusion that a lack of fingerprints may mean the ballot might have been marked using non-human means.
In such situations, extra scrutiny of the ballot may be wise.

TO ALL LOGICAL THINKERS there is no such thing as scan for fingerprints. Please be aware of all the foolish fake and deepstate attacks. That is all.

Jovan is involved in the audit and has confirmed that there is no fingerprints check.

Judge recusal forced?

LAWFARE 101
How to force a judge recusal.

Dont like the judge assigned to your case?

Step 1:
Retain a lawyer who had previously worked with the judge you dislike.

Step 2:
Have your newly retained lawyer file some paperwork with the judge you dislike.

Step 3:
Tell the judge to recuse himself because he now has a conflict of interest.

On the (dis)information battlefield, misdirection is a tool of war.
Keep the enemy guessing.
Dont lose sight of the goal.

NEW - Arizona attorney general Mark Brnovich rejects Democrats call for probe of Maricopa County 2020 election audit as "no facts" have been brought forward to warrant an investigation. @disclosetv

JUST IN - New judge (Daniel Martin) in the Democrats’ latest attempt to prevent the Senate’s audit of the 2020 results in Maricopa County was reportedly assigned by former Democrat Governor Janet Napolitano. New hearing scheduled for tomorrow. @disclosetv

New judge for the Maricopa county audit has past ties with Perkins Coie Law Firm. This indicates Judge Martin has a conflict of interest, especially in light of Marc Elias’ recent involvement. We ask that you excuse judge Martin immediately. Please hold a press conference to disclose this issue. You must act quickly and decisively to preserve the integrity of the AZ audit

Why would “auditors” try to sneak a camera onto the audit floor?
If photos of ballots from the audit leak, then there will instantly be calls to shut the audit down.

If we don’t know the exact procedure and policies of the audit, then neither does the enemy.
Information is valuable and if the procedures were completely known, it would be easier to infiltrate and disrupt the process.

Why are they fighting so hard?
Shouldn’t an audit of the “most secure election in history” be welcomed with open arms?

What you see on the floor of the audit is just the tip of the iceberg.
Dont forget about the canvassing, digital forensics and even physical forensics that are being done in parallel.

In what situation(s) can a divorce be strategic?

Why would the government announce a partnership to utilize private industry for spying on citizens?
Do they already have the data they need?
Can data obtained illegally be used in court?
By showing the data was obtained “legally”, can illegally obtained data now be presented “legally” in court?

First Amendment Loophole

Step 1
Government asks Big Tech to censor you

Step 2
Big Tech censors you

—

Explanation
Since the government didn’t technically censor you, your First Amendment right was not technically violated.
You are effectively silenced by the government with no standing to claim your rights were violated.

My posts from this channel don’t need to be attributed back to me.
Feel free to take the ideas and use them as your own.
A powerful idea should be able to stand on its own without needing to attach a name to improve the “credibility” of the idea.

Through systematically destroying personal credibility, ideas become invincible.