If you’re curious what the different colored shirts mean.

There are likely people on the floor taking part in the audit with the hidden agenda of purposefully not helping with the audit.
By pointing these certain people out, the audit manager can investigate them.

We are watching the auditors.
No shenanigans will get through the sharp eyes of the watchers.

FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING

2 boxes down...alotttt to go 🐸

Called @BobbyPiton earlier and had a chat about the potential use of the UV light station.
Since UV is able to detect oil from finger prints, if there are no fingerprints on the ballot then the likelihood of the ballot being marked through a non-human process is high.

No finger prints? Scrutinize!

Give @BobbyPiton a follow while you’re at it, he is doing great work with building the phantom voter data sets and corresponding algorithms.

They are not lifting fingerprints, but a lack of fingerprints might be a sign of a ballot that was not marked by a human.

UV light is able to detect fingerprints. I talked with Bobby Piton and we discussed whether the audit team may be looking for fingerprints or not. It was our conclusion that a lack of fingerprints may mean the ballot might have been marked using non-human means.
In such situations, extra scrutiny of the ballot may be wise.

TO ALL LOGICAL THINKERS there is no such thing as scan for fingerprints. Please be aware of all the foolish fake and deepstate attacks. That is all.

Jovan is involved in the audit and has confirmed that there is no fingerprints check.

Judge recusal forced?

LAWFARE 101
How to force a judge recusal.

Dont like the judge assigned to your case?

Step 1:
Retain a lawyer who had previously worked with the judge you dislike.

Step 2:
Have your newly retained lawyer file some paperwork with the judge you dislike.

Step 3:
Tell the judge to recuse himself because he now has a conflict of interest.

On the (dis)information battlefield, misdirection is a tool of war.
Keep the enemy guessing.
Dont lose sight of the goal.

NEW - Arizona attorney general Mark Brnovich rejects Democrats call for probe of Maricopa County 2020 election audit as "no facts" have been brought forward to warrant an investigation. @disclosetv

JUST IN - New judge (Daniel Martin) in the Democrats’ latest attempt to prevent the Senate’s audit of the 2020 results in Maricopa County was reportedly assigned by former Democrat Governor Janet Napolitano. New hearing scheduled for tomorrow. @disclosetv

New judge for the Maricopa county audit has past ties with Perkins Coie Law Firm. This indicates Judge Martin has a conflict of interest, especially in light of Marc Elias’ recent involvement. We ask that you excuse judge Martin immediately. Please hold a press conference to disclose this issue. You must act quickly and decisively to preserve the integrity of the AZ audit

Why would “auditors” try to sneak a camera onto the audit floor?
If photos of ballots from the audit leak, then there will instantly be calls to shut the audit down.

If we don’t know the exact procedure and policies of the audit, then neither does the enemy.
Information is valuable and if the procedures were completely known, it would be easier to infiltrate and disrupt the process.

Why are they fighting so hard?
Shouldn’t an audit of the “most secure election in history” be welcomed with open arms?

What you see on the floor of the audit is just the tip of the iceberg.
Dont forget about the canvassing, digital forensics and even physical forensics that are being done in parallel.