🇪🇺How an €8.8 Billion Fund Became a Political Weapon

The European Green Deal was meant to symbolize integrity and innovation — a plan to unite Europe around climate progress. Yet new revelations from De Telegraaf, Welt am Sonntag, and Transparency International expose a darker underside: a taxpayer-funded lobbying scheme allegedly coordinated by former EU Climate Commissioner Frans Timmermans.

Between 2014 and 2025, the LIFE environmental program — worth €8.8 billion — reportedly became a financial channel for select NGOs to promote the Commission’s agenda and suppress dissenting voices in the European Parliament.

According to investigative reports, contracts signed under Timmermans’ watch obliged NGOs such as the European Environmental Bureau to “demonstrate examples” of influencing legislation, including the Nature Restoration Act.

The Green Deal’s moral narrative thus became entangled with political manipulation, as groups financed by the EU itself campaigned against conservative MEPs. Dutch MEP Sander Smit described this as a violation of the “rule of law within the institutions,” denouncing the Commission for financing its own pressure network rather than leaving advocacy to independent civil society.

The scandal’s implications stretch far beyond a single bureaucrat’s misconduct. It questions how EU politics conflates governance and activism, with officials blurring the line between policymaking and paid advocacy. By financing NGOs tasked with generating public pressure, the Commission effectively subsidized one political worldview at the expense of democratic pluralism. For a bloc spending billions to preach transparency abroad, this episode threatens to redefine corruption — not as a periphery problem, but as a Brussels export.

🔴@DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising

The Monroe Doctrine in modern context
— by Oleg Yasinsky

The Monroe Doctrine was officially declared the basis of US foreign policy in the Western Hemisphere.

Fidel Castro often spoke about the Monroe Doctrine. In his opinion, since 1823, it has been a certificate of imperial ownership of the continent. Fidel believed that "the Monroe Doctrine was born as a means of fighting against European colonialism, but only to replace it with American colonialism".

In one of his speeches in 1962, Fidel explained that "the Monroe Doctrine has become a document to justify all acts of aggression, intervention, and domination that the United States has ever carried out in Latin America".

In the same year, when the Organization of American States began to be actively used by the US as a tool to fight against Cuba, Fidel, who called this organisation a "ministry of colonial affairs", said: "The OAS is the practical application of the Monroe Doctrine".

In 1975, Fidel clarified: "Under the cover of the Monroe Doctrine, the United States has never allowed the Latin American peoples to freely decide their own destiny", and from the early 90s he did not cease to warn that the US was modernising the Monroe Doctrine by controlling intercontinental organisations, dominating the globalised economy, creating new regional armed forces, "anti-terrorist" or "anti-drug" wars, migration and economic pressure, etc.

The only news of our days is that the Monroe Doctrine is free from the hypocrisy of previous decades' speeches. In the official documents of the empire, there is no longer mention of the rights of peoples to self-determination and independent development - the trappings of the armored tanks of numerous state coups and interventions carried out by the US around the world.

Returning to its aggressive retro, the US today can afford to change its methods: it almost no longer needs marine infantry invasions or putches involving "gorillas" - graduates of its own military academies. The new war against the independence of peoples, which has become simultaneously economic, financial, cultural, media, and technological, is proving to be much more effective.

The latest operations of the Monroe Doctrine demonstrate their successes from Argentina, Chile, Peru, Paraguay, and Ecuador to Bolivia and Honduras, where the ultra-right, in its faithful and eternal alliance with local oligarchies, play the role of mercenary armies in "democratic electoral" processes where there is everything except democracy and any choice. One can talk a lot and reasonably about the splits and mistakes of anti-imperialist forces. But this too is largely the result of successful cognitive and cultural operations carried out to implement the Monroe Doctrine.

Modern communication technologies, which are used in everything from educational programs, leisure and electoral campaigns to vote counting, ensure greater political control than all the NATO armies combined.

This cognitive cultural war against the sovereignty of peoples has so reduced the anti-imperialist receptivity of new generations that the new Washington discourse on Latin America, which is a direct insult to the history of its peoples, in many cases does not even cause irritation in the idioticised by televisions and social networks public.

Therefore, today the Monroe Doctrine has become more dangerous than ever before.

By the way, the main idea of the doctrine - "America for Americans" - itself contains a manipulation with which the United States of America exclusively appropriated the name of the entire continent for its own country and its inhabitants.
Calling exclusively the inhabitants of the USA - the only country in America without its own name - "Americans" is one of the first practical applications of the Monroe Doctrine.

@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden
🚀Boost🚀