Zilliqa Reports Theft of ZIL From Exchange Partner's Cold Wallet
Zilliqa stated that one of its exchange partners suffered a security incident in which ZIL was stolen from a cold wallet. The incident is under active investigation, and the team is working with relevant parties to determine the root cause and full scope. As a precaution, all exchanges have been notified and asked to temporarily pause ZIL deposits and withdrawals to prevent the stolen funds from being moved or sold through centralized platforms. The affected exchange and the amount stolen have not yet been disclosed. Zilliqa is a blockchain network launched in 2017 and was among the earliest public blockchains to implement sharding technology.
Zilliqa stated that one of its exchange partners suffered a security incident in which ZIL was stolen from a cold wallet. The incident is under active investigation, and the team is working with relevant parties to determine the root cause and full scope. As a precaution, all exchanges have been notified and asked to temporarily pause ZIL deposits and withdrawals to prevent the stolen funds from being moved or sold through centralized platforms. The affected exchange and the amount stolen have not yet been disclosed. Zilliqa is a blockchain network launched in 2017 and was among the earliest public blockchains to implement sharding technology.
$BANK whale watch π
Two major whale wallets are still holding a combined 15.09M $BANK
Definitely worth keeping an eye on for any future movement.
Wallets: β’ 0xC8026CF3EDEF1315C062bEE17CD9E0563197dbC8 β’
0xc858a0B483BceF02Da6Ad8A69588ee8e4578A365
Watching these addresses closely for any significant transfers or exchange deposits.
Two major whale wallets are still holding a combined 15.09M $BANK
Definitely worth keeping an eye on for any future movement.
Wallets: β’ 0xC8026CF3EDEF1315C062bEE17CD9E0563197dbC8 β’
0xc858a0B483BceF02Da6Ad8A69588ee8e4578A365
Watching these addresses closely for any significant transfers or exchange deposits.
Forwarded from ATAS - Platform for Analyzing Exchange Volumes
Once again, gold finds itself caught between two opposing forces.
On the one hand, geopolitics should support GC: the US and Iran are back in focus, the Middle East remains the marketβs primary source of geopolitical risk, and traders are pricing in a premium for oil, the Strait of Hormuz, and potential supply disruptions.
On the other hand, that same geopolitical backdrop is currently weighing on gold through inflation risk.
If oil prices surge again amid an escalation of the military conflict, this would reinforce already persistent inflationary pressure in the US. As the probability of rates remaining higher for longer or even hints of a hike increases, the dollar strengthens and gold prices come under renewed pressure.
Key Drivers for the Second Half of July
1. The Fed and Kevin Warsh
The change in Fed leadership is one of the most important factors for gold this summer.
Kevin Warsh is already trying to signal that the Fed will not simply follow Trumpβs political preferences and will remain data-dependent. For gold, the key question is whether the new Fed will ultimately lean dovish or hawkish.
On the one hand, US inflation data has come in softer than the market feared. On the other, oil and geopolitics could push inflation expectations higher again.
If the Fed stresses the need to keep rates elevated or even considers further hikes, that would weigh on GC futures and could send prices below the 3,800 level.
2. Iran, the US, and July Geopolitics
At the moment, gold is being sold through the rise in yields.
In other words, escalation on its own does not guarantee higher gold prices. For a strong bullish scenario, yields need to decline alongside the geopolitical risk - not rise.
The strongest setup for GC would be more than just higher oil prices. It would require a full risk-off move in which investors buy both Treasuries and gold at the same time.
3. Oil, Inflation, and Real Rates
Oil has become the link between geopolitics and the Fed.
If oil remains elevated, the market will fear another acceleration in inflation. That limits the Fedβs ability to cut rates and keeps real yields supported.
For gold, this is an uncomfortable combination.
GC does not pay a coupon, so when real yields rise, investors are more likely to rotate into cash, bonds, or other dollar-denominated instruments.
This is why a decline in real rates is critical for a sustained recovery in gold.
5. Central Banks and Long-Term Demand
Goldβs long-term fundamental story remains strong.
Central banks continue to view gold as a reserve-diversification asset, particularly in a world where sanctions, geopolitics, and confidence in the dollar-based system are becoming increasingly important themes.
This does not always support GC over the course of a single week, but it does create a fundamental bid on deeper pullbacks.
That is why gold can fall when yields rise, while every meaningful correction still attracts medium-term demand.
Macro Bottom Line
GC is currently caught between two opposing forces:
The key question for July 17β24 is:
Will the market treat Iran as a safe-haven trigger or as an inflation shock?
The answer to that question together with the Fed meeting at the end of July - will determine whether gold can reclaim $4,000β4,030 or move deeper toward $3,900β3,850.
Weβll break down the technical levels and scenarios in more detail in the second post.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π‘ Trade Futures with zero stress!
MEXCβs Loss Coverage Program is LIVE!
π° 1,000,000 USDT Prize Pool
β° Same-day loss compensation
π 100,000 USDT Lucky Ticket pool
π‘ Liquidation Protection
Req: VVIP M-Score 351+
Join now: https://www.mexc.com/futures-activity/trading-protection/1925?utm_source=region_media&utm_medium=eu&utm_campaign=tradingloss_protect&inviteCode=mexc-CipherSMC
#MEXC #MEXC0Fee #CEX #DEX
MEXCβs Loss Coverage Program is LIVE!
π° 1,000,000 USDT Prize Pool
β° Same-day loss compensation
π 100,000 USDT Lucky Ticket pool
π‘ Liquidation Protection
Req: VVIP M-Score 351+
Join now: https://www.mexc.com/futures-activity/trading-protection/1925?utm_source=region_media&utm_medium=eu&utm_campaign=tradingloss_protect&inviteCode=mexc-CipherSMC
#MEXC #MEXC0Fee #CEX #DEX
Forwarded from Premium Club
NEAR Long
Lev - 5x
Entry 1 - 1.968 (50%)
Entry 2 - 1.84 (50%)
Targets - 2.07 - 2.18 - 2.32 - 2.48
Stoploss - 1.69
@CryptoSignals
Lev - 5x
Entry 1 - 1.968 (50%)
Entry 2 - 1.84 (50%)
Targets - 2.07 - 2.18 - 2.32 - 2.48
Stoploss - 1.69
@CryptoSignals
Forwarded from Crouton Digital | Official
#Bitcoin #Strategy #BIP110 #MicroStrategy #Markets π
Saylor defended Bitcoin's immutability. That same week he started building a cash buffer
When Michael Saylor says "don't touch the protocol," people listen. BIP 110 - a proposal to change Bitcoin's consensus rules to combat spam transactions - collapsed exactly when Saylor and Adam Back went public against it.
Adam Back backed him up: banning "junk" transactions is censorship inside a supposedly permissionless network. Miner support stalled at 0.7% - BIP 110 won't survive to the August deadline.
That same week, Strategy quietly sold 4.8M MSTR shares for $466.7M and purchased zero BTC. Cash reserves grew to $3B. The portfolio: 843,775 BTC at an average of $75,476 - carrying an unrealized loss of roughly $9.7B at current prices.
The man who publicly calls selling BTC "a mistake" chose a dollar cushion.
1οΈβ£ Bitcoin Banking Adoption Index: reality behind the rhetoric
Strategy's own benchmark across the 25 largest financial institutions puts real BTC adoption at just 32% - well below what Saylor's public messaging implies.
π’ Fidelity leads at 71%
π’ BNY Mellon at 46%, Goldman Sachs at 45%
π’ The rest of the top 25 trail significantly behind
Even the leader tops out at 71%, while BNY Mellon (46%) and Goldman Sachs (45%) remain below 50%. Banks are adopting Bitcoin cautiously - exactly the same caution Strategy is now showing with its own BTC purchases.
2οΈβ£ The 2000 parallel still matters
Back then, MicroStrategy restated its earnings, the SEC filed a case, and shares crashed from $260 to $86. The key difference this time: Bitcoin's protocol was successfully defended. The network is not changing.
What remains open is whether the convertible bonds and preferred shares used to accumulate those 843K BTC can hold up under genuine market stress.
Bitcoin's immutability was defended by the person whose own financial construction is far more fragile than the protocol he just protected.
β¨ The protocol question is settled. Bitcoin doesn't change - that argument is closed.
But whether the wrapper of convertibles and preferred shares holding those 843K BTC weathers a serious drawdown is still wide open. Protocol risk and Strategy risk are two distinct things. Only the first one just got resolved.
β‘οΈ Website crouton.digital β¬
οΈ
Saylor defended Bitcoin's immutability. That same week he started building a cash buffer
BIP 110 is dead - miner support stuck below 0.7%. Bitcoin doesn't change. But Strategy sold $466.7M in shares and bought zero BTC.
When Michael Saylor says "don't touch the protocol," people listen. BIP 110 - a proposal to change Bitcoin's consensus rules to combat spam transactions - collapsed exactly when Saylor and Adam Back went public against it.
π Michael Saylor, Strategy:
"There are 110 things more dangerous to Bitcoin than spam. BIP 110 turns a spam debate into a consensus change that would invalidate transactions currently valid and paying fees. That precedent is the danger."
Adam Back backed him up: banning "junk" transactions is censorship inside a supposedly permissionless network. Miner support stalled at 0.7% - BIP 110 won't survive to the August deadline.
That same week, Strategy quietly sold 4.8M MSTR shares for $466.7M and purchased zero BTC. Cash reserves grew to $3B. The portfolio: 843,775 BTC at an average of $75,476 - carrying an unrealized loss of roughly $9.7B at current prices.
The man who publicly calls selling BTC "a mistake" chose a dollar cushion.
Strategy's own benchmark across the 25 largest financial institutions puts real BTC adoption at just 32% - well below what Saylor's public messaging implies.
Even the leader tops out at 71%, while BNY Mellon (46%) and Goldman Sachs (45%) remain below 50%. Banks are adopting Bitcoin cautiously - exactly the same caution Strategy is now showing with its own BTC purchases.
Back then, MicroStrategy restated its earnings, the SEC filed a case, and shares crashed from $260 to $86. The key difference this time: Bitcoin's protocol was successfully defended. The network is not changing.
What remains open is whether the convertible bonds and preferred shares used to accumulate those 843K BTC can hold up under genuine market stress.
π $75,500 - the zone where Strategy turns profitable and would likely resume aggressive buying. $60,000 - debt covenant stress-test territory. Purchases paused and cash reserves climbing signals one clear thing: the company is positioning for volatility.
Bitcoin's immutability was defended by the person whose own financial construction is far more fragile than the protocol he just protected.
But whether the wrapper of convertibles and preferred shares holding those 843K BTC weathers a serious drawdown is still wide open. Protocol risk and Strategy risk are two distinct things. Only the first one just got resolved.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Crouton Digital | Official
β’ Market Stats (July) +4BπΌ
β’ Total crypto market cap: ~$2.18T
β’ BTC: ~$64K | Dominance: ~59%
β’ Sentiment: Fear 36
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BREAKING: President Trump is imposing an additional 50% tariff on a range of Canadian goods in response to "trade discrimination."
Details include:
1. President Trump signed 3 proclamations today targeting different sets of Canadian imports
2. The tariffs are targeting separate areas where the US says it has experienced discrimination
3. The tariffs fall under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930
These tariffs are set to take effect in 30 days.
Details include:
1. President Trump signed 3 proclamations today targeting different sets of Canadian imports
2. The tariffs are targeting separate areas where the US says it has experienced discrimination
3. The tariffs fall under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930
These tariffs are set to take effect in 30 days.
Forwarded from ATAS - Platform for Analyzing Exchange Volumes
Scenario 1 β Base Case: Consolidation Ahead of the Fed Meeting
Probability: 40%
Base case: GC attempts to hold the $3,960β4,000 area and build a rotation higher toward $4,067β4,080. This is the first major resistance zone, and without meaningful support from the macro backdrop, price is likely to roll over again from this area.
Confirmations for this scenario:
If price establishes itself above $4,035, the next target is $4,067β4,080.
Scenario 2 β Bearish: A Break Below $3,975 and Further Downside
Probability: 45%
This scenario becomes active if the market continues to sell gold in response to rising real rates. A break below $3,975 could open the way toward $3,925β3,900, followed by $3,800β3,780.
The key triggers for this scenario are:
Under this scenario, gold could fall even amid negative geopolitical developments, because the dominant factor would not be fear, but the cost of holding dollars.
Scenario 3 β Bullish Shock: A Return of the Safe-Haven Bid and a Break Above $4,080
Probability: 15%
This scenario becomes possible if the market rapidly shifts from an βinflation shockβ regime into a βrisk-off protectionβ regime.
What could trigger this scenario:
From a technical perspective, the key development would be acceptance above $4,080. If price establishes itself above this zone, the next target is $4,100β4,165.
Bottom Line:
From a long-term perspective, the structure remains bullish: central-bank demand, geopolitics, fiscal deficits, sanctions risk, and concerns surrounding the dollar-based system have not disappeared.
In the short term, however, GC is trading under the pressure of renewed inflation fears and the prospect of interest rates remaining elevated.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β€1
Forwarded from ATAS - Platform for Analyzing Exchange Volumes
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What could move the markets this week and which scenarios are worth watching? In this 15-minute weekly overview, Anastasiia breaks down the key levels, market structure, and potential trading scenarios for:
Youβll see the main bullish and bearish scenarios, important reaction zones, and the conditions that could confirm each setup.
Like this format? Leave a reaction below!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Cipher SMC - FX x Crypto
Looking ahead, thereβs a possible pump next week if momentum aligns with the macro trend.
#GoldTrading
Exactly β the market pump played out just as I mentioned last week.
https://s3.tradingview.com/snapshots/5/5Ab9gfoW.png
Exactly β the market pump played out just as I mentioned last week.
https://s3.tradingview.com/snapshots/5/5Ab9gfoW.png
Forwarded from Premium Club
Arkm Long
Lev - 5x
Entry 1 - $0.1066 (50%)
Entry 2 - $0.097 (50%)
Targets - $0.112 - 0.120 - 0.13 - 0.15
Stoploss - $0.089
@CryptoSignals
Lev - 5x
Entry 1 - $0.1066 (50%)
Entry 2 - $0.097 (50%)
Targets - $0.112 - 0.120 - 0.13 - 0.15
Stoploss - $0.089
@CryptoSignals