#PENGU Spot Buy Setup
βͺοΈ Entry Zone: 0.006251 - 0.0057
βͺοΈ Targets : 0.0068 - 0.0075 - 0.0082 - 0.0092
βͺοΈ Invalidation: 0.005525
βͺοΈ Entry Zone: 0.006251 - 0.0057
βͺοΈ Targets : 0.0068 - 0.0075 - 0.0082 - 0.0092
βͺοΈ Invalidation: 0.005525
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
$BTC has NEVER closed below production cost since 2020.
Current electrical cost is around $60,000.
Current electrical cost is around $60,000.
Forwarded from Cipher SMC - Technical Analysis
Bitcoin Production Cost Indicator
https://www.tradingview.com/script/ug1V9P1U-Bitcoin-Production-Cost/
https://www.tradingview.com/script/ug1V9P1U-Bitcoin-Production-Cost/
TradingView
Bitcoin Production Cost β Indicator by capriole_charles
Bitcoin's Production Cost
Based on raw data from CBECI.
Follow me to read more about the calculation logic.
Based on raw data from CBECI.
Follow me to read more about the calculation logic.
Forwarded from CoinTrendzBot
β
First Squawk (548.3k)
βTRUMP: THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN HAS ASKED US TO CONTINUE βTALKS.β WE HAVE AGREED TO DO SO, BUT THE UNITED STATES HAS STATED TO THEM, IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, THAT THE CEASE FIRE IS OVER! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMPβ
π 5 minutes ago Β· π 22.6k
π 110π 29π¬ 19
βTRUMP: THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN HAS ASKED US TO CONTINUE βTALKS.β WE HAVE AGREED TO DO SO, BUT THE UNITED STATES HAS STATED TO THEM, IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, THAT THE CEASE FIRE IS OVER! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMPβ
π 5 minutes ago Β· π 22.6k
π 110π 29π¬ 19
Forwarded from Premium Club
π TECHNICAL SETUP: $ENA (12H)
Ethena is breaking out past macro descending trendline resistance after establishing a strong horizontal accumulation base.
π― Targets: 0.088 - 0.10 - 0.12 - 0.15 - 0.25
π Stoploss: Daily Close below 0.068
Are you locking in positions at the baseline or waiting to chase the breakout later? Let's see who's backing this run. π
@CryptoSignals
Ethena is breaking out past macro descending trendline resistance after establishing a strong horizontal accumulation base.
π― Targets: 0.088 - 0.10 - 0.12 - 0.15 - 0.25
π Stoploss: Daily Close below 0.068
Are you locking in positions at the baseline or waiting to chase the breakout later? Let's see who's backing this run. π
@CryptoSignals
Forwarded from Crouton Digital | Official
#Bitcoin #BTC #OnChain #MarketIntelligence #Macro π
π Bears say zero, on-chain says $42-62k - and there's one signal threading through all the floor calls
The current bear market produced a rare convergence: the market's loudest voices are making specific floor calls. The disagreement is obvious. Less obvious is where the signals actually overlap.
1οΈβ£ Two types of bears - very different arguments
Jeremy Grantham - who predicted the dot-com bubble and the 2008 crash - says BTC will go to zero. His thesis: it never became useful money or digital gold, and holds mainly because someone believes they can sell it higher. Dave Portnoy is asking BTC holders why the skeptics are wrong, "because right now it looks exactly like that."
These aren't technical traders making price targets. They're attacking the narrative itself.
Peter Schiff takes a structural angle: since October 2025, Strategy spent nearly $17B buying BTC - and the price still dropped 53%. His argument: if that scale of buying couldn't hold the price, Strategy's eventual forced selling to maintain dollar reserves could push BTC toward $20k - a level it last traded 3.5 years ago.
2οΈβ£ Where the on-chain signals converge
Jiang Zhuoer (BTC.TOP founder) targets $42-44k by October-December 2026. His signal: Strategy's mNAV is at 0.72 - nearly matching its 2022 low. Historically the mNAV minimum formed roughly 6 months before the BTC price bottom. He's holding SHORT positions until then.
PlanB puts the floor below the Realized Price - currently near $53k. This line now overlaps almost exactly with the 200-week geometric MA - and the bottom has printed below both in every prior bear cycle.
Adam Back (Blockstream CEO) reads the same zone differently: prices near the 200-week MA around $62k, exchange reserves declining, BTC dominance rising. Capital currently in AI-sector stocks is a rotation, not an exit - when profit-taking begins, BTC becomes the natural destination.
π― The hypothesis worth tracking
Ki Young Ju (CryptoQuant CEO) provides the macro frame: the next parabolic cycle needs to absorb over $1T in Realized Cap. The current cycle absorbed $697B for ~689% returns. Each cycle requires an order of magnitude more capital - that trillion-dollar institutional wave hasn't arrived yet.
The on-chain signals cluster in one range: mNAV at 0.72, Realized Price at $53k, 200-week MA at $62k. These are the same indicators that converged near the 2022 cycle bottom.
The hypothesis: either BTC finds its floor in the $42-62k zone and a new cycle begins by early 2027, or Schiff's forced-seller scenario plays out and structural gravity wins. The difference between those outcomes isn't sentiment - it's one balance sheet decision at one companyπ€
Subscribeβ‘οΈ Crouton Digital Official | Website crouton.digitalβ¬
οΈ
π Bears say zero, on-chain says $42-62k - and there's one signal threading through all the floor calls
Portnoy says zero. Schiff says $20k. Jiang Zhuoer says $42-44k. PlanB says sub-$53k. Adam Back says we're near the long-term floor. Ki Young Ju says one more parabolic cycle ahead. Six takes - one question: has the bottom already printed?
The current bear market produced a rare convergence: the market's loudest voices are making specific floor calls. The disagreement is obvious. Less obvious is where the signals actually overlap.
Jeremy Grantham - who predicted the dot-com bubble and the 2008 crash - says BTC will go to zero. His thesis: it never became useful money or digital gold, and holds mainly because someone believes they can sell it higher. Dave Portnoy is asking BTC holders why the skeptics are wrong, "because right now it looks exactly like that."
These aren't technical traders making price targets. They're attacking the narrative itself.
Peter Schiff takes a structural angle: since October 2025, Strategy spent nearly $17B buying BTC - and the price still dropped 53%. His argument: if that scale of buying couldn't hold the price, Strategy's eventual forced selling to maintain dollar reserves could push BTC toward $20k - a level it last traded 3.5 years ago.
Jiang Zhuoer (BTC.TOP founder) targets $42-44k by October-December 2026. His signal: Strategy's mNAV is at 0.72 - nearly matching its 2022 low. Historically the mNAV minimum formed roughly 6 months before the BTC price bottom. He's holding SHORT positions until then.
PlanB puts the floor below the Realized Price - currently near $53k. This line now overlaps almost exactly with the 200-week geometric MA - and the bottom has printed below both in every prior bear cycle.
Adam Back (Blockstream CEO) reads the same zone differently: prices near the 200-week MA around $62k, exchange reserves declining, BTC dominance rising. Capital currently in AI-sector stocks is a rotation, not an exit - when profit-taking begins, BTC becomes the natural destination.
π― The hypothesis worth tracking
Ki Young Ju (CryptoQuant CEO) provides the macro frame: the next parabolic cycle needs to absorb over $1T in Realized Cap. The current cycle absorbed $697B for ~689% returns. Each cycle requires an order of magnitude more capital - that trillion-dollar institutional wave hasn't arrived yet.
The on-chain signals cluster in one range: mNAV at 0.72, Realized Price at $53k, 200-week MA at $62k. These are the same indicators that converged near the 2022 cycle bottom.
The hypothesis: either BTC finds its floor in the $42-62k zone and a new cycle begins by early 2027, or Schiff's forced-seller scenario plays out and structural gravity wins. The difference between those outcomes isn't sentiment - it's one balance sheet decision at one company
Subscribe
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Cipher SMC - Technical Analysis
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Listen to the audio from Michael Huddleston (ICT), the creator of Smart Money Concepts β itβs powerful for psychological strength.
β€1
Forwarded from Lookonchain
This guy successfully cashed out over $1M on $CASHCAT!
He spent 0.49 $ETH($838) to buy 15.04M $CASHCAT, then sold it for 580 $ETH($1.04M), locking in a profit of over $1M(1,183x).
If he had held until now, his profit would have reached $2.9M.
Could this guy be @thebrianjung?
https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xa70fc67c9f69da90b63a0e4c05d229954574e313?maker=0xDE4C44e841972C2c4Db1b1E27a353340fE9899DE
He spent 0.49 $ETH($838) to buy 15.04M $CASHCAT, then sold it for 580 $ETH($1.04M), locking in a profit of over $1M(1,183x).
If he had held until now, his profit would have reached $2.9M.
Could this guy be @thebrianjung?
https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xa70fc67c9f69da90b63a0e4c05d229954574e313?maker=0xDE4C44e841972C2c4Db1b1E27a353340fE9899DE
Forwarded from Premium Club
#TAO Long
Lev - 5x
π Entry 1 - 212.6 (50%)
π Entry 2 - 198 (50%)
π― Targets - 222.6 - 233.8 - 244 - 265 - 291
βοΈ Stoploss - 185.1
@CryptoSignals
Lev - 5x
@CryptoSignals
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Cipher SMC - Technical Analysis
YouTube
Grading Setups From C to A+ (FVG + Liquidity Strategy)
Join FREE Community of traders: https://discord.gg/6snPnJMAjU
-
Grading trading setups from A+ to C using my liquidity trading model.
-
Understanding the difference between A+, B, and C setups can massively improve your trading by helping you avoid lowβ¦
-
Grading trading setups from A+ to C using my liquidity trading model.
-
Understanding the difference between A+, B, and C setups can massively improve your trading by helping you avoid lowβ¦
π₯1
Forwarded from Cipher SMC - Technical Analysis
Liquidity Basics
BFIs (Banks & Financial Institutions) need a tonne of liquidity to enter & exit the market with minimal slippage [remember - for every buy order, there must be an equivalent sell order for a trade to take place (vice versa)].
We assume there is available liquidity (resting orders) behind every structural point in the market.
The more significant the structure, the more available liquidity we assume may be resting behind it.
Identifying these areas on our price charts can help us to spot where institutional market activity has already occurred (sweep zones) or may occur in the future (inducement).
BFIs (Banks & Financial Institutions) need a tonne of liquidity to enter & exit the market with minimal slippage [remember - for every buy order, there must be an equivalent sell order for a trade to take place (vice versa)].
We assume there is available liquidity (resting orders) behind every structural point in the market.
The more significant the structure, the more available liquidity we assume may be resting behind it.
Identifying these areas on our price charts can help us to spot where institutional market activity has already occurred (sweep zones) or may occur in the future (inducement).
β’ BSLQ -> buy-side liquidity = liquidity behind highs
β’ SSLQ -> sell-side liquidity = liquidity behind lows
β€1
Forwarded from Premium Club
#ONDO Long
Lev - 5x
π Entry 1 - 0.3266 (50%)
π Entry 2 - 0.3030 (50%)
π― Targets - 0.3395 - 0.353 - 0.375 - 0.401 - 0.432
βοΈ Stoploss - 0.2910
@CryptoSignals
Lev - 5x
@CryptoSignals
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#WLD Spot Buy Setup
π Entry 1 - 0.3925 (50%)
π Entry 2 - 0.355 (50%)
π― Targets - 0.4320 - 0.4780 - 0.5320 - 0.589 - 0.645
βοΈ Stoploss - 0.3433
π Entry 1 - 0.3925 (50%)
π Entry 2 - 0.355 (50%)
π― Targets - 0.4320 - 0.4780 - 0.5320 - 0.589 - 0.645
βοΈ Stoploss - 0.3433