can you extend the same gratitude towards Rosenberg's diaries? I can prove the same exact case for them just like this

I thought they were unreliable because of the Soviets but this post shows how identical they are. no changes, not even minimal

I don't think there's any need. If Goebbels' diaries have proven reliable, as you've posted over the years, Rosenberg's diaries are consequently reliable, since they confirm many of Goebbels' entries.

yeah he does

So, you are aware that your posts on Dalton's translation is pretty stupid right? To confirm accuracy you're supposed to compare it with the original text and not another translation. This method is commonly done with the bible as does any document ever.

the infamous passage on christianity in mein kampf is actually inaccurate in the stalag translation

the main argument is that it doesn't actually say "embody" when the original german says "Verkörpere" which in the most literal sense means to embody something.

any german dictionary will point you to the same thing (the sources listed are dictionaries not AI itself)

There is absolutely nothing wrong with Daltons translation which is why every major NS seller sells his translation.

Yes, I noticed. Dalton only got one thing wrong in his translation. In the original, "foreign to human nature" never appears. Dalton made a mistake here.

For the rest, it's an excellent translation.

Thats still roughly accurate. The original says foreign to "mankind"

Remember that this is a modern translation

I wouldnt call that an error

whereas stalag's errors are actual real errors, it adds stuff completely different

ihr Erscheinen in der Geschichte der Menschheit als etwas feststellen, was dieser bis dahin fremd gewesen war

replace human-nature with mankind and its basically the same thing

to note their appearance in the history of mankind as something that had been foreign to it until then.

Yes, I admit that. I was fooled into believing it was actually an official translation.

my bad

yes, same meaning "foreign to it" the "it" meaning mankind. your translation is simply more literal but in english we dont always rely on literal translations for everything

for some reason they have this weird obsession with the swastika being christian when its not. every book cited about the swastika always says that it existed before christ.