𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐂𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐁𝐄𝐓𝐖𝐄𝐄𝐍 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐘
Exploring NS concepts using only NSDAP sources
Ｐａｒｔ （２／２）

2.) 𝐑𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐯𝐬 𝐎𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐢𝐧

Christianity views human history as an ongoing conflict between humanity and sin which later follows into a path of redemption. (Romans 5:12) This is another example of a false doctrine due to its Inconsideration to the idea of race and racial struggle. The National Socialist conception of world history is specifically racial struggle, not sin. Hitler offers a metaphor for this: "The sin against blood and race is the original sin in this world. It brings an end to every nation that commits it." [1] Hitler argued that we need a new conception of history more fitted to National Socialism. He specifically based this on racial struggle:

"We have no historical research that values the importance of the human races for the destiny of peoples (Völker). We need a conception of history, which views history not as just compiling a series of battles, but that penetrates into the racial instincts of conquest, the primal racial elements. Then comes the new worldview! History instruction must lead to the original factors: race and racial instincts." [2]

Race is destiny. Without race, we are nothing as it hints at our own character (racial soul) and to believe in the Christian idea of free will would be contradictory to the racial determinism of National Socialist biology:

"But we must not forget that what our children inherit from us cannot be removed from them by any force in the world; that it constitutes their innermost being, which cannot be changed. And that is why we say: race is destiny. A destiny so cruel, so compelling, so controlling that it brands one person a criminal and makes another a genius. Neither is responsible for this. There is no free will in the sense that I could change and shape my character as I wish. My character, my essence, is there, is immutable, is given to me by fate; I do not control my character, but my character controls me." [3]

This is then backed up by the Hitler-Youth Journal on world history:

"We now see the meaning of world history not in whether the development of peoples, through the influence of Christianity, for example, has taken an inevitable course, or whether a universal idea of ​​humanity has bound all peoples together by a common bond, or whether the goal and meaning of our earthly existence will be achieved through the creation of a vast melting pot of peoples based on international solidarity, but rather in the extent to which the forces of race, in their struggle with and against national cultures, have prevailed and led to the victory of a culture appropriate to our race. From this perspective, world history appears to us as a continuous struggle of the most opposing elements, which do not follow any particular compulsion, but are the expression of a dynamic battle of the most diverse racial souls for dominance on this earth. That our view is correct is proven to us by the current, particularly sharp divide across the globe with a worldview that is designed to destroy the very best primal forces of Nordic blood and thus extinguish the lifeblood of the soul of the dominant race on this earth. We believe we can say that the struggle against Bolshevism is not merely a struggle of politics, economics, and sustenance, but a struggle between two worldviews that are as opposed as fire and water, because their foundations and spiritual sources spring from two fundamentally different racial souls." [4]

This idea of the world being a struggle between difference races is supported by Hitler.

Source:
[1] Mein Kampf (Dalton), p.306
[2] BArch NS 26/54 Rede vom 12. Juni 1925 in Plauen p.5
[3] Tornisterschrift des Oberkommando der Wehrmacht Abteilung Inland 1941 "Rassen und Rasse" p.13
[4] Wille und Macht. Jahrgang 3, Heft 18, 1935 Die Anfgaben des neuen Kampfes von Karlheinz Rüdiger p.12

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴏᴄᴛʀɪɴᴀʟ ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴀᴅɪᴄᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ ɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ꜱᴏᴄɪᴀʟɪꜱᴍ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄʜʀɪꜱᴛɪᴀɴɪᴛʏ

Getting into the philosophical concepts of National Socialism, we can point to two main ideas:

1.) 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐥
National Socialist racial theory rejected the Christian separation of body and soul by arguing that the soul is biologically rooted in blood and race. Since Christianity teaches that the soul and salvation are universal and not determined by race, it demonstrates that the two concepts are irreconcilable.

2.) 𝐑𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐯𝐬 𝐎𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐢𝐧
National Socialism rejects the Christian idea that human history is centered on universal sin and redemption, instead interpreting history as a biological and racial struggle between competing peoples and racial souls. The NS worldview is based on racial determinism and race-based destiny, not sin based destiny.

Biology is the basis for the National Socialist worldview. When taken to it's fullest extent, National Socialism points to the rejection of everything that is foreign. The first principle of National Socialism comes from the fact that: The Volk is the meaning and purpose of our existence.

Contemporary Third Reich comparisons between the National Socialist worldview and the Christian worldview:
SS training material from the Reich Security Main Office
Training Guide for SS leader candidates in the Sicherheitsdienst

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐒𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐍𝐈𝐄𝐓𝐙𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐄 𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐃 𝐁𝐘 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐒𝐃𝐀𝐏
The sad attempt by NS_Heathenry_Exposed to defame Nietzsche's philosophy

Much confusion about Nietzche and his philosophy has risen in both the 19th and 20th century. No source but National Socialist Germany has explained it better. In 1937, an article in Der Schulungsbrief explained it in detail showing that in Nietzsche's works, he believed: "the essence of the Jew "parasitic.", that the Jews falsified morality in Europe, etc. [1]

The NSDAP publication 'Willie und Macht' also addressed this too:

"Professorial guardians of the National Socialist idea warn: "Nietzsche was a friend of the jews." But they do not report that the few jews who came close to him personally became his most hateful enemies after a while [...] "Nietzsche was a German hater." But the fact that he rejected the Germany of the time because he wanted the Germany of the future, that from the depths of a German protest he detested the Wilhelminian fatherlandism, the shallowness of the patriotic attitude and educational madness, is kept quiet. [...] We National Socialists know it more clearly than the people of bygone eras: we do not grow through doctrines, but through people who present us with challenges, who call us to action, and who command us to insight. Friedrich Nietzsche is a man whose voice reaches far beyond our own days, admonishing and demanding into the distant future. In this sense, we confess to be Nietzsche's successors." [2]

Moreover, what type of anti-semitism did Nietzsche oppose? We can see easily that Nietzsche was against jews but in other places we see arguments against anti-semitism. This is easily explained:

"What Nietzsche primarily attacked about antisemitism has largely been overcome today. It is historical antisemitism of confessional, social, or economic forms, which lacks a modern biological basis, especially antisemitism based on mere negation. "Antisemites do not forgive Jews for having intellect and money. Antisemites is a name for those who have come down hard." And he names those anti-Semites, the latest speculators in idealism, who today roll their eyes in a Christian-Aryan-bourgeois way and, through a patience-exhausting abuse of the cheapest means of agitation, the moral attitude, seek to agitate all the brutish elements of the people. [...] He acknowledges that capable, strong-willed individuals fight among them, but argues that anti-Semitism is all the more harmful because it wastes and poisons so much capable energy, and that is precisely why he fights against it. However, he only wages wars where he cannot afford to belittle others. Nietzsche's position on antisemitism is decisive, overriding all personal and other influences. He contrasts a non-biologically based antisemitism with the Lamarckian misconception of possible Jewish assimilation." [3]

National Socialists including Hitler never saw Nietzsche as an enemy but as a friend to our worldview.

Source:
[1] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #08 "Friedrich Nietzsche: Der unerbittliche Werter des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts" p.295-296
[2] Wille und Macht. "Bekenntnis zu Nietzsche" Jahrgang 3/4, Heft 24/1 1935 p.31-32
[3] Heinrich Härtle, Nietzsche und der Nationalsozialismus (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, Franz Eher Nachf., 1944) p.48-49

SEE: HITLER AND NIETZSCHE

𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐃𝐎𝐄𝐒 𝐈𝐓 𝐌𝐄𝐀𝐍 𝐓𝐎 𝐁𝐄 𝐑𝐀𝐂𝐄 𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓?

It means that we acknowledge the Divine Creator of the Universe who created our Blood. That the Blood He created supersedes all recorded dogma, all superficial religion.

It is this eternal iron law of the Blood that we follow, established directly by the Creator himself, which cannot ever be manipulated nor construed

For without the Blood, no higher culture would be conceivable or otherwise maintained

Therefore the preservation of the nobler elements of our Blood is the prerequisite to any higher culture, which includes all religion.

This is the dominant force behind National Socialism, which dominates all of world history.

𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐊 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐁𝐘 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐒𝐃𝐀𝐏
The pure lack of common knowledge on the NSDAP

A post with thousands of views portrays the book "War Jesus Jude?" as an official NSDAP publication when it explicitly says the opposite in the book. The cover of the book clearly displays that it was published by "Verlag des Evangelischen Bundes" then at the end of the book it explicitly states it was printed by "A. Heine G.m.b.H., Gräfenhainichen". It's not by Franz Eher Nachfolger GmbH.

The worst part is the fact that it seems like they haven't read the book at all. Paul Massler answers the question on the linage of Jesus on page 4:

"It is pointless for us from the outset to even attempt to ascribe to him [Jesus] a Nordic character, as even H. St. Chamberlain tried so desperately. Such attempts are nothing more than wishful thinking and constructions devoid of any scientific proof. According to the New Testament, there is absolutely no doubt that Jesus was Jewish by blood. We are speaking here, first and foremost, of Jesus the man. Paul also emphasizes this Jewish lineage when he says in Romans 9:5 that Jesus came from the fathers according to the flesh."

Then the quote that's posted by both "NSDAP was Christian" and "NSDAP Loved Christ" seems to have omitted the very next line below it affirming that Jesus belonged to the jewish people at the end of the day.

What a joke.

𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐁𝐔𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐑𝐍 𝐈𝐒 𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐕𝐎𝐋𝐊
The National Socialist state endorses morality based on loyalty to the race

"When the Pope, in his encyclical, describes the situation of Catholics in Germany "Mit brennender Sorge," we state unequivocally that we, too, are filled "with burning concern." Our burning concern is the purity, health, and vitality of the millions of boys and girls who will one day be the men and women of our nation. We want these boys and girls not to be torn apart by denominational discord, not to be mentally and physically abused by false seducers, and not to be raised in a monastic, dull, clerical narrow-mindedness against the state, but rather for a generation to grow up strengthened by a robust morality, educated in love of homeland, loyalty to the people, trust in the state, and a worldview whose strength is continually renewed by the unbroken power of the coming generation."

Source: Hakenkreuzbanner: NS-Tageszeitung für Mannheim u. Nordbaden, Sonntag-Ausgabe 13.06.1937 p.4

SEE: GERMAN LAW ABOVE VATICAN LAW

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐕𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐏𝐎𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐎 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐊 𝐎𝐍 𝐏𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐒𝐌
Arguments against the book Die große Lüge des politischen Katholizismus from the Vatican Radio

Reports from Sicherheitsdienst surveillance documented a piece in October 29, 1938 of the Vatican saying the following:

"Dieter Schwarz has published a pamphlet with the NSDAP's central publishing house in Berlin entitled "The Great Lie of Political Catholicism." This is a shoddy piece of work that, in itself, wouldn't deserve any serious attention. However, since the text is clearly written for propaganda purposes and launches an outrageous attack on Catholicism as a whole, we will briefly examine it this evening. Right in the opening sentences, the reader is informed of the lie referred to in the title. It states: "For five years now, the foreign atrocity propaganda against Germany has been reporting on the persecution of Christians in National Socialist Germany, on the suppression of religion, the stifling of all religious activity, and the systematic promotion of godlessness in National Socialist Germany." So much for the first sentence, and the second immediately identifies who is accused of lying. It states that the church leaders, both large and small, in Germany and around the world, as well as the highest echelons of the Catholic Church in Rome, meet here in a peculiar and rare unanimity, often in complete agreement of words and details presented, with the international propaganda of lies against Germany that otherwise flows from Jewish-Marxist sources. Pastors write, Catholic newspapers, speeches, and circulars from the highest church authorities breathe the spirit of this political incitement. Two claims are thus made: 1) The persecution of the Church in Germany is a lie, and 2) the liars are the princes of the Church. Naturally, one is now eager to see how the author proves his accusations. The reader takes it for granted that the author will systematically examine the claims of the Pope and the bishops and demonstrate that they are not based on truth. But here, one is immediately disappointed. Not the slightest attempt is made to refute even one of the many precisely defined complaints of the bishops. It is not even known whether the author is familiar with the bishops' statements or has ever bothered to read the pastoral letters. It is clear, therefore, that the writer has taken the easy way out. [...] Why does the author say nothing about the enormous promotion of the movement to leave the Church, about the dismantling of almost all Catholic organizations, about the flooding of the entire country with unprecedentedly inflammatory, anti-Church literature, about the ruthless closure of denominational schools, about the confiscation of papal and episcopal pastoral letters, about the police searches of episcopal offices, about the anti-Christian propaganda in state organizations, etc.? The author of the pamphlet probably knows why he is concealing these things."

Source: BArch NS 2/64 Überwachung des Vatikansenders (Bericht des Chefs der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD) p.404-406

SEE: THE ATTITUDE OF THE VATICAN TOWARDS NS GERMANY

𝐖𝐇𝐘 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐄𝐕𝐎𝐋𝐀'𝐒 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊𝐒 𝐑𝐄𝐉𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐃?
Investigating the purpose of why NS_Heathenry_Exposed flaunts this report

Even when we look at their own post, it states EXACTLY why he was rejected: "His political plans for a Romano-Germanic Imperium are of a utopian character". Yet, any type of relevance towards Evola in this context was because he was not a christian.

The Truth: Evola was rejected for his Anti-NS ideas, not simply because of 'paganism' in itself.

In Evola's "Pagan Imperialism", he writes that:

"The error of certain race fanatics who think that the reintegration of a race in its ethnic unity signifies ipso facto the rebirth of a people, lives exactly here: they regard man as if he could be regarded as horses, cats, or dogs of a ‘pure breed’. The preservation or the restoration of the purity of race in the narrowest sense, can be everything in an animal, but not in man - in the man of superior type: even for man, it can constitute a condition which may be necessary under certain aspects, is not sufficient in any case, since the racial factor is not the only one which defines man. [...] The aristocratic idea of a tradition of Leaders - NOT the democratic or “nationalist” idea, which depends upon the mere community of blood, soil, and birth - must be the foundation and axis of every doctrine of race rightly understood - of our restoration."

In the later published book 'Notes on the Third Reich', Evola provides his own analysis of National Socialism. Here, his critique of core NS doctrines are no different:

"In the second place, when dealing with Fascism, we have already recognised the legitimacy that could be offered by the ideal of a new, superior human type at the centre of a general process of crystallisation, rectification and formation of a nation’s substance, on the condition that we do not excessively emphasise the biological aspect in this ideal, but only if we particularly stress the ‘race of the spirit.’ Instead, in National Socialist racism it was precisely this biological aspect that played a significant role and indulged in wishful thinking by means of a ‘scientistic’ mental deformation, when it was thought that all that had to be done was to discover prophylaxis and erect barriers against crossbreeding and miscegenation, along with more eugenic measures, so that lost virtues would reappear, the idea being that, almost automatically, man would arise again as the creator of a higher culture."

"Not only the ancient German traditions, but also the very concept of Reich and, as we shall see, the concept of race were brought by Hitler to the level of the masses, which implied their degradation and distortion."

Head of the Office of Racial Policy Walther Groß made clear the importance of the racial doctrine:

"All of this is necessary, not for the sake of some theoretical-intellectual nonsense, but to give people back the connection with the great laws of life, the understanding and the inner growth into the primitive but ultimately great sensations and feelings of the living human being that sustain life itself. All of this is necessary. However, an attitude to life that is geared towards the newly discovered laws of life of race, blood and soil is not just a matter for the parlor scholar, not a matter that is only presented at the lectern, about which one only writes in a book, which one only speaks about on the radio, about which one only makes laws - but it is a matter that concerns us all and every single one of us, day by day and hour by hour of our entire lives. Because on this question, whether it will be possible to give the people, all of us and everyone else outside, a new purpose in life, the future ultimately lies before us and our children."

Based on this, it makes perfect sense why Julius Evola was rejected. This is so easily clear to anyone who has actually read through his works.

Source:
[1] Pagan Imperialism by Julius Evola
[2] Notes On The Third Reich by Julius Evola
[3] Der Schulungsbrief #4 1939 "Volk und Rasse" von Dr Walther Groß

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐒𝐎𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐖𝐀𝐑 𝐎𝐍 𝐉𝐄𝐒𝐔𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐒𝐌

«Furthermore, at Munich, on 23 April 1935, the Gestapo had sent out confidential instructions on how to handle the Jesuits. Entitled "Safeguarding against the Jesuits,” the document called attention to the Jesuit opposition to the Nazis in their public statements. "These lectures, moreover, are so ambiguously and cunningly composed that a juridical punishment of the lecturer is possible in only very few cases," stated the police instruction [...] By 1939, then, the Jesuit schools, like all religious schools, had been deprived of state recognition and support. Rather than operate schools dedicated to the principles of National Socialism, the Jesuits realized that they would more effectively thwart the influence of the Hitler-Jugend by ceasing to operate under the new conditions. [...] One should not forget that the seminaries of the Society of Jesus in Frankfurt, Pullach and Valkenburg were all restricted in their operations either directly by the Nazis or by the circumstances of the war. Likewise, in 1941, the Nazis had put an end to the Jesuit residences at Aachen, Berlin, Bonn, Cologne, Diisseldorf, Essen, Hoheneichen, Mittelsteine, Munich and Miinster. By this time, the Nazis were successfully implementing their harsh decrees against the church and its religious groups.»

From: Lapomarda, Vincent A. The Jesuits and the Third Reich. Edwin Mellen Press, 1989. p.13, 15, 21

SEE: DISMISSAL OF JESUITS FROM THE WEHRMACHT

If we are to reject every source for being a recollection according to our opponents then why do these same opponents cite memoirs to prove Hitler's thinking? Because they are dishonest. What we can easily demonstrate is the corroboration of other independent sources which report the same exact thing. This is not only applied just to Hitler's religion, but across the board with his beliefs.

We primarily use contemporary sources in conjunction with memoirs of those who lived in the Third Reich to further expand on what we already knew. This is as scholarly as it gets. We do not rely merely on a post-war consensus of people that say "Hitler was X", we rely on the eyewitness testimonies from so many people that knew Hitler and his own writings which report the same thing. Primary sources are important.

"That is the reason why in this study we constantly cite many references – sometimes even very similar ones – from the most varied sources as proofs of the opinions Hitler held on various subjects. While in certain instances this might detract from the readability of the study, even though many parallel citations are only referred to in the notes, we believed it to be important that we support Hitler’s previously less well-known opinions on various topics in such detail as to clearly demonstrate to the reader that these are not randomly selected statements which are atypical for Hitler, but rather statements which represent his thinking. The material for our study is therefore primarily Hitler’s speeches, writings and ‘conversations’. Besides the known printed sources such as Mein Kampf, Hitler’s ‘Second Book’, the ‘Complete Recordings 1905– 1924’ and the ‘table talks’, our study is based on the still unpublished Hitler speeches and articles of 1925–32, as well as numerous speeches made between 1933 and 1945 which were not taken into account in the Domarus collection on which most investigations are based."

— Historian Rainer Zitelmann, in Hitler's National Socialism. Management Books 2000, (2022).

Only someone who is against Hitler or the Third Reich would oppose using the sources from it's time.

𝐏𝐑𝐄-𝐕𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐈𝐈 𝐒𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐂𝐄 𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐌𝐈𝐓 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐑 𝐒𝐎𝐑𝐆𝐄
Destroying the common cope of citing Adrien Arcand

The official Vatican newspaper "L'Osservatore Romano", in which Pius XII was still alive and as pope, in 1945 published an article directly addressing the relationship between the Vatican and National Socialism from their perspective. The Vatican wrote that the infamous Mit Brennender Sorge encyclical was in fact targeting National Socialism as race idolatry:

"In those critical years, combining the attentive vigilance of the Pastor with the patient forbearance of the Father, Our great Predecessor Pius XI carried out his mission as Supreme Pontiff with intrepid fortitude. However, when, having tried in vain all the ways of persuasion, he saw himself clearly faced with the deliberate violations of a solemn pact and with a religious persecution, concealed or overt, but always harshly conducted, on Passion Sunday 1937, in his Encyclical «Mit brennender Sorge», he revealed to the eyes of the world what National Socialism really was: the proud apostasy from Jesus Christ, the denial of his doctrine and his redemptive work, the cult of force, the idolatry of race..."

Yet we're supposed to take Adrien Arcand's word for it saying the opposite instead of citing the Vatican? How stupid.

Source: L'Osservatore Romano della Domenica. "Il Santo Padre, rievocando le sofferenze gloriose della Chiesa perseguitata, addita all'umanità le vie della Pace degna di Dio e degli uomini." Città del Vaticano, 10 Giugno 1945, Anno XII, N. 23 (578), p.2