๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐
A strangely cited passage from NS_Heathenry_Exposed
A piece of evidence against the validity of the table talks is cited from Otto Skorzeny's memoirs in which he spoke about the process and handling of the notes. What isn't talked about is the further context inside his memoirs in which he had the opportunity to attend these table talks but refused Hitler's offer:
""Naturally," Hitler had told me, "from now on, whenever you are with us, you will always be our guest, Skorzeny. I shall always be delighted to see you again." I thanked the Fรผhrer, but thereafter I refrained from attending those "midnight teas," which often dragged on until three or four in the morning. It was there that many advanced their careersโthanks to flattery and intrigueโprovided they held views similar to those of Reichsleiter Martin Bormann, who was invariably present. The documentary volumes published after the war purport to reproduce the conversations held during some of these "midnight teas." Without Hitlerโs knowledge, two of Bormannโs aidesโDr. Henry Picker and Dr. Heinrich Heimโhad been tasked with recording the Fรผhrerโs words. Dr. Heim specified that he dictated these accounts from memory, having only rarely jotted down a few keywords, which he scribbled on a sheet of paper resting on his knees. Bormann would modify the version handed to himโalways behind the Fรผhrerโs backโand, furthermore, the publishers have subsequently edited the text of these books, which were, naturally, never intended for publication. These documents must, therefore, be treated with the utmost circumspection by historians. The Reichsleiterโwho was fiercely anticlericalโportrays Hitler as an atheist, and others as militant anti-Catholics; yet, in reality, the Fรผhrerโwho was raised as a Catholicโnever renounced his faith. Quite the contrary: he believedโand frequently statedโthat the two principal pillars of Western civilization were the Roman Church and the British Empire. I have the weakness of thinking today that, perhaps, I was wrong not to attend the midnight teas whenever it was possible for me to do so. Had I attended, I might have been able to alert the Fรผhrer to certain realities of which he remained unaware."
How does Otto Skorzeny know whether the contents of the table talks itself are valid or not if he had admitted not going to them? How does he know that Hitler never renounced Catholicism? Answer: He simply doesn't. Otto Wagener's notes shows that Hitler denounced the Catholic teachings of the afterlife. Along with Gerhard Engel noting that the Catholic Church was too clever to publicly excommunicate him and wanting to fight the Church from its root.
Citing Skorzeny against the table talks is pointless if we look at the context of the passage.
SEE: HITLER'S TABLE TALK IS ENDLESSLY CORROBORATED BY OTHER INDEPENDENT SOURCES
A strangely cited passage from NS_Heathenry_Exposed
A piece of evidence against the validity of the table talks is cited from Otto Skorzeny's memoirs in which he spoke about the process and handling of the notes. What isn't talked about is the further context inside his memoirs in which he had the opportunity to attend these table talks but refused Hitler's offer:
""Naturally," Hitler had told me, "from now on, whenever you are with us, you will always be our guest, Skorzeny. I shall always be delighted to see you again." I thanked the Fรผhrer, but thereafter I refrained from attending those "midnight teas," which often dragged on until three or four in the morning. It was there that many advanced their careersโthanks to flattery and intrigueโprovided they held views similar to those of Reichsleiter Martin Bormann, who was invariably present. The documentary volumes published after the war purport to reproduce the conversations held during some of these "midnight teas." Without Hitlerโs knowledge, two of Bormannโs aidesโDr. Henry Picker and Dr. Heinrich Heimโhad been tasked with recording the Fรผhrerโs words. Dr. Heim specified that he dictated these accounts from memory, having only rarely jotted down a few keywords, which he scribbled on a sheet of paper resting on his knees. Bormann would modify the version handed to himโalways behind the Fรผhrerโs backโand, furthermore, the publishers have subsequently edited the text of these books, which were, naturally, never intended for publication. These documents must, therefore, be treated with the utmost circumspection by historians. The Reichsleiterโwho was fiercely anticlericalโportrays Hitler as an atheist, and others as militant anti-Catholics; yet, in reality, the Fรผhrerโwho was raised as a Catholicโnever renounced his faith. Quite the contrary: he believedโand frequently statedโthat the two principal pillars of Western civilization were the Roman Church and the British Empire. I have the weakness of thinking today that, perhaps, I was wrong not to attend the midnight teas whenever it was possible for me to do so. Had I attended, I might have been able to alert the Fรผhrer to certain realities of which he remained unaware."
How does Otto Skorzeny know whether the contents of the table talks itself are valid or not if he had admitted not going to them? How does he know that Hitler never renounced Catholicism? Answer: He simply doesn't. Otto Wagener's notes shows that Hitler denounced the Catholic teachings of the afterlife. Along with Gerhard Engel noting that the Catholic Church was too clever to publicly excommunicate him and wanting to fight the Church from its root.
Citing Skorzeny against the table talks is pointless if we look at the context of the passage.
SEE: HITLER'S TABLE TALK IS ENDLESSLY CORROBORATED BY OTHER INDEPENDENT SOURCES
๐15
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐
The case of the book surrounding Adrien Arcand
In the book 'Serviam: The Political Ideology of Adrien Arcand' emerges two supposed quotes from Arthur Kitson and Kurt Lรผdecke on Hitler's fancy being the Virgin mary and his private apartments having many crucifixes. The issue with this is the fact that among the 100+ footnotes inside the book, none exists for these two quotes nor further elaboration. Being that these specific testimonies cannot be found in any other place besides this book, it would be safe to say that these quotes are dubious at worst and faked at best.
When we look at an authentic writing of this same Kurt Lรผdecke in his book "I knew Hitler", there are a multitude of his own testimonies given that further show Hitler did not believe in Christianity. Lรผdecke recalled Hitler saying:
"The French Revolution, Bolshevism, all of Marxism, in fact, our whole deformity and atrophy of spirit and soul would never have come into being except for this oriental mummery, this abominable levelling mania, this cursed universalism of Christianity, which denies racialism and preaches suicidal tolerance.โ [1]
Another interesting point brought by Mikael Nilsson in his book "Christianity in Hitler's Ideology" is that:
"The fact that we know of no prayer books or crosses (crucifixes) having been in Hitlerโs possession is perhaps a problem for the thesis of Hitler as an honest Christian believer." [2]
Source:
[1] I Knew Hitler by Kurt Lรผdecke (1938) p.466
[2] Christianity in Hitler's Ideology by Mikael Nilsson (PDF page 180)
The case of the book surrounding Adrien Arcand
In the book 'Serviam: The Political Ideology of Adrien Arcand' emerges two supposed quotes from Arthur Kitson and Kurt Lรผdecke on Hitler's fancy being the Virgin mary and his private apartments having many crucifixes. The issue with this is the fact that among the 100+ footnotes inside the book, none exists for these two quotes nor further elaboration. Being that these specific testimonies cannot be found in any other place besides this book, it would be safe to say that these quotes are dubious at worst and faked at best.
When we look at an authentic writing of this same Kurt Lรผdecke in his book "I knew Hitler", there are a multitude of his own testimonies given that further show Hitler did not believe in Christianity. Lรผdecke recalled Hitler saying:
"The French Revolution, Bolshevism, all of Marxism, in fact, our whole deformity and atrophy of spirit and soul would never have come into being except for this oriental mummery, this abominable levelling mania, this cursed universalism of Christianity, which denies racialism and preaches suicidal tolerance.โ [1]
Another interesting point brought by Mikael Nilsson in his book "Christianity in Hitler's Ideology" is that:
"The fact that we know of no prayer books or crosses (crucifixes) having been in Hitlerโs possession is perhaps a problem for the thesis of Hitler as an honest Christian believer." [2]
Source:
[1] I Knew Hitler by Kurt Lรผdecke (1938) p.466
[2] Christianity in Hitler's Ideology by Mikael Nilsson (PDF page 180)
๐21
๐๐ง ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง'๐ฌ ๐ง๐๐ฐ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ค ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฅ๐๐ซ'๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ
Taking the sources into account
Nilsson rightfully acknowledges that Hitler rejected the apostle Paul and his teachings. Such implication would then follow on being against the divinity of Jesus. What Nilsson argues is that there is an infinite nuance on what is Christian as according to him there is no objective definition of what is Christian:
"Some readers may think that what has been said thus far reasonably has to be interpreted as evidence that Hitler was not a Christian, because how could someone who thinks that the apostle Paul perverted Christianity be considered a Christian? However, it is not that easy to define who is a Christian and who is not. After all, various denominations and sects of self-proclaimed Christians have been fighting each other for centuries over this exact issue. [...] To talk of Nazi Christianity as heresy, writes Susannah Heschel, implies that there is an orthodoxy to compare it to. There is in fact no such thing." [1]
The greatest testament to what is Christian can be based on the divinity of Jesus, much of the evidence that isn't mentioned in Nilsson's book suggest that there doesn't seem to be a genuine belief in Jesus's divinity. Nilsson writes in his conclusion of the Jesus divinity chapter that: "All of what has been said above of course does not definitely prove that Hitler believed that Jesus really was divine, since it is impossible to know what someone truly believes." [2] This statement highlights that even Nilsson acknowledges that what Hitler said publicly on specific issues cannot be taken for granted.
Nonetheless, Nilsson does bring an interesting source to the table. He shows (although unsure how he knew this) that Heinrich Heim in a correspondence said Hitler seldom spoke about his personal religious beliefs openly. [3] This alone shows that Hitler's religious beliefs is nowhere near related to the established beliefs as any normal Christian would simply profess belief in Christ and go on with their day. Hitler's chief secretary Johanna Wolf was interrogated in 1948 about Hitlerโs religious inclinations, she had just as much difficulty as many other's in Hitler's private circle in figuring out what Hitler actually believed in. [4] Taking Nilsson's own sources into account, Hitler believed Christianity itself was Jewish and had nothing to do with Jesus, further making the thesis of Hitler being exclusively against institutionalized religion false. The fact there aren't any private sources of Hitler affirming the divinity of Jesus in the same manner also is a huge problem to the central theme of Nilsson's book.
So what can we truly say about this?
Hitler rejected Yahweh, so there cannot be a "son of God" as there is no God the father. Hitler rejected appeal to revelation, Hitler deified Nature, Hitler gave an agnostic definition on what is the purpose of life and who created it, questioned if there was an afterlife, etc. Much of what Hitler appeals to in his worldview comes from Race, Nature, and Science. The fact that there are so many confidants in Hitler's circle independently attesting to Hitler rejecting Christianity only backs up the whole point.
A less talked about passage in Wagener's notes is Hitler recognized that Christmas was originally an old Germanic festival that was replaced with the birth of Christ. He commented "... the midnight sun and the yuletide festival are cosmic concepts already familiar to young people. But no one can say with certainty whether Christ was or was not bom on this particular day." [5]
Mikael Nilsson's book 'Christianity in Hitler's Ideology' doesn't add anything new to the debate.
Source:
[1] Christianity in Hitler's Ideology by Mikael Nilsson (PDF page 180)
[2] ibid, p.177
[3] ibid, p.179
[4] Hitler's Religion by Richard Weikart (PDF page 33)
[5] Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant by Otto Wagener p.278
Taking the sources into account
Nilsson rightfully acknowledges that Hitler rejected the apostle Paul and his teachings. Such implication would then follow on being against the divinity of Jesus. What Nilsson argues is that there is an infinite nuance on what is Christian as according to him there is no objective definition of what is Christian:
"Some readers may think that what has been said thus far reasonably has to be interpreted as evidence that Hitler was not a Christian, because how could someone who thinks that the apostle Paul perverted Christianity be considered a Christian? However, it is not that easy to define who is a Christian and who is not. After all, various denominations and sects of self-proclaimed Christians have been fighting each other for centuries over this exact issue. [...] To talk of Nazi Christianity as heresy, writes Susannah Heschel, implies that there is an orthodoxy to compare it to. There is in fact no such thing." [1]
The greatest testament to what is Christian can be based on the divinity of Jesus, much of the evidence that isn't mentioned in Nilsson's book suggest that there doesn't seem to be a genuine belief in Jesus's divinity. Nilsson writes in his conclusion of the Jesus divinity chapter that: "All of what has been said above of course does not definitely prove that Hitler believed that Jesus really was divine, since it is impossible to know what someone truly believes." [2] This statement highlights that even Nilsson acknowledges that what Hitler said publicly on specific issues cannot be taken for granted.
Nonetheless, Nilsson does bring an interesting source to the table. He shows (although unsure how he knew this) that Heinrich Heim in a correspondence said Hitler seldom spoke about his personal religious beliefs openly. [3] This alone shows that Hitler's religious beliefs is nowhere near related to the established beliefs as any normal Christian would simply profess belief in Christ and go on with their day. Hitler's chief secretary Johanna Wolf was interrogated in 1948 about Hitlerโs religious inclinations, she had just as much difficulty as many other's in Hitler's private circle in figuring out what Hitler actually believed in. [4] Taking Nilsson's own sources into account, Hitler believed Christianity itself was Jewish and had nothing to do with Jesus, further making the thesis of Hitler being exclusively against institutionalized religion false. The fact there aren't any private sources of Hitler affirming the divinity of Jesus in the same manner also is a huge problem to the central theme of Nilsson's book.
So what can we truly say about this?
Hitler rejected Yahweh, so there cannot be a "son of God" as there is no God the father. Hitler rejected appeal to revelation, Hitler deified Nature, Hitler gave an agnostic definition on what is the purpose of life and who created it, questioned if there was an afterlife, etc. Much of what Hitler appeals to in his worldview comes from Race, Nature, and Science. The fact that there are so many confidants in Hitler's circle independently attesting to Hitler rejecting Christianity only backs up the whole point.
A less talked about passage in Wagener's notes is Hitler recognized that Christmas was originally an old Germanic festival that was replaced with the birth of Christ. He commented "... the midnight sun and the yuletide festival are cosmic concepts already familiar to young people. But no one can say with certainty whether Christ was or was not bom on this particular day." [5]
Mikael Nilsson's book 'Christianity in Hitler's Ideology' doesn't add anything new to the debate.
Source:
[1] Christianity in Hitler's Ideology by Mikael Nilsson (PDF page 180)
[2] ibid, p.177
[3] ibid, p.179
[4] Hitler's Religion by Richard Weikart (PDF page 33)
[5] Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant by Otto Wagener p.278
๐15
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Setting the record straight
To say that Nietzsche did not have a profound influence on Hitler would be denying one of the core individuals within National Socialism's ideological tradition of optimism and will-power. Many have seen the infamous photo of Hitler in the Nietzsche-Archiv but little seem to know the official caption behind it. In Heinrich Hoffmann's book Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, the original caption writes: "The Fรผhrer at the bust of the German philosopher whose ideas inspired two great popular movements: that of National Socialist Germany and that of Fascist Italy.", [1] So already off the bat do we see public connection between Hitler and Nietzsche in official sources. Keep in mind that Hitler endorsed the Nietzsche-Archiv by privately funding it, giving 50,000 Reichsmarks. [2]
On July 30th of 1943, the NSDAP had documented that Adolf Hitler had personally gifted Mussolini a unique edition of the collected works of Nietzsche on his birthday:
"The Fรผhrer sent the Duce, as a personal gift for his 60th birthday, through Field Marshal von Kesselring, the collected works of Nietzsche in a specially produced, unique edition with a heartfelt dedication" [3]
If Hitler was not been influenced or simply had ignored Nietzsche, there would be no reason for Hitler to openly suggest the works of Nietzsche to others. The official NSDAP stance on Nietzsche was that he was: "the greatest defender and justifier of life and reality" [4] This was then justified by Hitler when in 1942 he appealed to Nietzsche's words for his own rightful fanatical optimism:
"Whoever thinks he can frighten me somehow or surprise me is wrong. I have always taken to heart the words of a great German philosopher: โA blow that does not knock a strong man over, only makes him stronger" [5]
In private, Hitler had equally praised Nietzsche. According to Walther Hewel in a conversation about Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche in 1941, Hitler said that Nietzsche was: "More intuitive than purely analytical. Affirmation of the laws of nature and of struggle. Positive user manual. Hence, the true philosopher of National Socialism." [6] Goebbels corroborates this as in 1943 in a conversation about Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, he noted Hitler to have said "Nietzsche is naturally much closer to our viewpoint than Schopenhauer" [7]
So it appears that Hitler had approved of Friedrich Nietzsche both publicly and privately.
Source:
[1] Heinrich Hoffmann: Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, 100 Bild-Dokumente aus dem Leben des Fรผhrers
[2] BArch R 43-II/894c Nietzsche-Institut Weimar 1935 p.63
[3] Der Fรผhrer: das Hauptorgan der NSDAP Gau Baden; der badische Staatsanzeiger 31.07.1943 p.1
[4] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #08 โStaat und Kirchen im 19. Jahrhundertโ (Reichsorganisationsleiter der NSDAP) p.299
[5] Vรถlkischer Beobachter, Die Rede des Fรผhrers im Berliner Sportpalast, Januar 30,1942 p.3
[6] Diaries and Papers of Botschafter Hewel. Nachlass Walther Hewel. Microfilm DJ-75. Filmed February 1971. Film No 96928, Reel 23 [EP Microform Limited] p.151
[7] NARA, RG 242, T-84, Roll 264 p.296
Setting the record straight
To say that Nietzsche did not have a profound influence on Hitler would be denying one of the core individuals within National Socialism's ideological tradition of optimism and will-power. Many have seen the infamous photo of Hitler in the Nietzsche-Archiv but little seem to know the official caption behind it. In Heinrich Hoffmann's book Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, the original caption writes: "The Fรผhrer at the bust of the German philosopher whose ideas inspired two great popular movements: that of National Socialist Germany and that of Fascist Italy.", [1] So already off the bat do we see public connection between Hitler and Nietzsche in official sources. Keep in mind that Hitler endorsed the Nietzsche-Archiv by privately funding it, giving 50,000 Reichsmarks. [2]
On July 30th of 1943, the NSDAP had documented that Adolf Hitler had personally gifted Mussolini a unique edition of the collected works of Nietzsche on his birthday:
"The Fรผhrer sent the Duce, as a personal gift for his 60th birthday, through Field Marshal von Kesselring, the collected works of Nietzsche in a specially produced, unique edition with a heartfelt dedication" [3]
If Hitler was not been influenced or simply had ignored Nietzsche, there would be no reason for Hitler to openly suggest the works of Nietzsche to others. The official NSDAP stance on Nietzsche was that he was: "the greatest defender and justifier of life and reality" [4] This was then justified by Hitler when in 1942 he appealed to Nietzsche's words for his own rightful fanatical optimism:
"Whoever thinks he can frighten me somehow or surprise me is wrong. I have always taken to heart the words of a great German philosopher: โA blow that does not knock a strong man over, only makes him stronger" [5]
In private, Hitler had equally praised Nietzsche. According to Walther Hewel in a conversation about Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche in 1941, Hitler said that Nietzsche was: "More intuitive than purely analytical. Affirmation of the laws of nature and of struggle. Positive user manual. Hence, the true philosopher of National Socialism." [6] Goebbels corroborates this as in 1943 in a conversation about Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, he noted Hitler to have said "Nietzsche is naturally much closer to our viewpoint than Schopenhauer" [7]
So it appears that Hitler had approved of Friedrich Nietzsche both publicly and privately.
Source:
[1] Heinrich Hoffmann: Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt, 100 Bild-Dokumente aus dem Leben des Fรผhrers
[2] BArch R 43-II/894c Nietzsche-Institut Weimar 1935 p.63
[3] Der Fรผhrer: das Hauptorgan der NSDAP Gau Baden; der badische Staatsanzeiger 31.07.1943 p.1
[4] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #08 โStaat und Kirchen im 19. Jahrhundertโ (Reichsorganisationsleiter der NSDAP) p.299
[5] Vรถlkischer Beobachter, Die Rede des Fรผhrers im Berliner Sportpalast, Januar 30,1942 p.3
[6] Diaries and Papers of Botschafter Hewel. Nachlass Walther Hewel. Microfilm DJ-75. Filmed February 1971. Film No 96928, Reel 23 [EP Microform Limited] p.151
[7] NARA, RG 242, T-84, Roll 264 p.296
๐21
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
The fruitless attempt at anti-NSHeathenry slander
It's quite funny how it's pointed out that in the post about Hitler's 1934 meeting of him saying that the German people can continue without Christianity, that the infamous anti-church propaganda images were used. Anyone with a brain can easily sense that this is for the sake of imagery and obviously not condoning the anti-NS tendencies of the allies.
Yet when this image from a French Anti-NS newspaper "L'Ami du peupl" in 1935 [1] on German soldiers whipping Jesus is used countless times, no one seems to care. in fact, they seemingly mistake this as somehow some contemporary pro-German pro-Christian illustration when its the opposite.
The same person (Jean-Louis Chancel) that made the "Gott mit uns" illustration also made a similar piece in 1940 depicting a National Socialist whipping presumably Jesus on the cross again. [2] If we were to apply this same logic onto them, then they are pro-allied propaganda themselves.
They are hypocrites.
Source:
[1] L'Ami du peuple, 7 aoรปt 1935, p. 1
[2] Chancel, Jean-Louis. Le Livre Noir 1939 - 1945. Paris: Les รditions de la Nouvelle France, [circa 1945]
The fruitless attempt at anti-NSHeathenry slander
It's quite funny how it's pointed out that in the post about Hitler's 1934 meeting of him saying that the German people can continue without Christianity, that the infamous anti-church propaganda images were used. Anyone with a brain can easily sense that this is for the sake of imagery and obviously not condoning the anti-NS tendencies of the allies.
Yet when this image from a French Anti-NS newspaper "L'Ami du peupl" in 1935 [1] on German soldiers whipping Jesus is used countless times, no one seems to care. in fact, they seemingly mistake this as somehow some contemporary pro-German pro-Christian illustration when its the opposite.
The same person (Jean-Louis Chancel) that made the "Gott mit uns" illustration also made a similar piece in 1940 depicting a National Socialist whipping presumably Jesus on the cross again. [2] If we were to apply this same logic onto them, then they are pro-allied propaganda themselves.
They are hypocrites.
Source:
[1] L'Ami du peuple, 7 aoรปt 1935, p. 1
[2] Chancel, Jean-Louis. Le Livre Noir 1939 - 1945. Paris: Les รditions de la Nouvelle France, [circa 1945]
๐18
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Looking at Hitler's repeated meetings with Bishops
There are some noteworthy issues with the people who post this meme of Hitler allegedly saying "I do not place race above religion." The meme misleads readers to think that this is a speech by Hitler and thus entirely unquestionable when in fact it's Minutes of the conference of diocesan representatives in Berlin on April 25 and 26, 1933. [1] Another being that this meeting takes place 3 months before the Reichskonkordat was signed, implicating there is political motive behind it. The context portrays Hitler saying: "I was attacked for my handling of the Jewish question. For 1500 years, the Catholic Church viewed Jews as vermin, confined them to ghettos, and so on; that's when people realized what Jews were." [2]
Yet, in 1934, when Hitler met with two of the most recalcitrant Protestant bishops, Hans Meiser of Bavaria and Theophil Wurm of Wรผrttemberg, he seemed to have completely rejected this notion of following church tradition like he is reported to have said beforehand, and instead advocated for the doctrine of race as more authoritative than the Church. He issued a veiled threat, telling them that if they did not cooperate, Christianity would disappear, just as it had in Russia:
"Christianity will disappear from Germany just as it did from Russia. The denominations were unable to prevent the French Revolution, Bolshevism, Marxism, or the 1918 Revolution. [...] Germans existed for hundreds of thousands of years before Christ without Christianity and will continue to live even after Christianity has disappeared. [...] The Church must become accustomed to the doctrine of blood and race; just as the Catholic Church could not change the fact that the Earth revolves around the sun, so too could it not erase the irrefutable facts inherent in blood and race. If it does not acknowledge this, progress will simply pass it by." [3]
The latter meeting is undoubtedly an authentic note of Hitler's words as Faulhaber reported the same line of thought in Hitler in 1936. Indeed, the sources suggest that Hitler saying "I do not place race above religion" is not genuine belief Hitler held. To continue to peddle this meme would be ignoring the parts in Hitler's speeches where he specifically emphasized race over religion.
Race is the most important aspect of what makes culture and a Volk.
Source:
[1] Katholische Kirche und Nationalsozialismus: Dokumente 1930โ1935 von Hans Mรผller p.104
[2] ibid, p.118
[3] LKA Nรผrnberg, Bestand Landesbischof Meiser, Sitzungsprotokolle 1933โ37, Manuskriptband, 62 f. [Cited in Dokumente zur Kirchenpolitik des Dritten Reiches: Bd. 2. 1934/35 p.79-80]
SEE: HITLER'S OFFICIAL PARTY CIRCULAR ON RACE
Looking at Hitler's repeated meetings with Bishops
There are some noteworthy issues with the people who post this meme of Hitler allegedly saying "I do not place race above religion." The meme misleads readers to think that this is a speech by Hitler and thus entirely unquestionable when in fact it's Minutes of the conference of diocesan representatives in Berlin on April 25 and 26, 1933. [1] Another being that this meeting takes place 3 months before the Reichskonkordat was signed, implicating there is political motive behind it. The context portrays Hitler saying: "I was attacked for my handling of the Jewish question. For 1500 years, the Catholic Church viewed Jews as vermin, confined them to ghettos, and so on; that's when people realized what Jews were." [2]
Yet, in 1934, when Hitler met with two of the most recalcitrant Protestant bishops, Hans Meiser of Bavaria and Theophil Wurm of Wรผrttemberg, he seemed to have completely rejected this notion of following church tradition like he is reported to have said beforehand, and instead advocated for the doctrine of race as more authoritative than the Church. He issued a veiled threat, telling them that if they did not cooperate, Christianity would disappear, just as it had in Russia:
"Christianity will disappear from Germany just as it did from Russia. The denominations were unable to prevent the French Revolution, Bolshevism, Marxism, or the 1918 Revolution. [...] Germans existed for hundreds of thousands of years before Christ without Christianity and will continue to live even after Christianity has disappeared. [...] The Church must become accustomed to the doctrine of blood and race; just as the Catholic Church could not change the fact that the Earth revolves around the sun, so too could it not erase the irrefutable facts inherent in blood and race. If it does not acknowledge this, progress will simply pass it by." [3]
The latter meeting is undoubtedly an authentic note of Hitler's words as Faulhaber reported the same line of thought in Hitler in 1936. Indeed, the sources suggest that Hitler saying "I do not place race above religion" is not genuine belief Hitler held. To continue to peddle this meme would be ignoring the parts in Hitler's speeches where he specifically emphasized race over religion.
Race is the most important aspect of what makes culture and a Volk.
Source:
[1] Katholische Kirche und Nationalsozialismus: Dokumente 1930โ1935 von Hans Mรผller p.104
[2] ibid, p.118
[3] LKA Nรผrnberg, Bestand Landesbischof Meiser, Sitzungsprotokolle 1933โ37, Manuskriptband, 62 f. [Cited in Dokumente zur Kirchenpolitik des Dritten Reiches: Bd. 2. 1934/35 p.79-80]
SEE: HITLER'S OFFICIAL PARTY CIRCULAR ON RACE
๐24
๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Defending National Socialism
Almost everywhere in modern day do we see the effects of Judaism on our culture through controlling of the media/press and relentless foreign lobbying for the interests of nations except our own. This is internationalism. in 1927, Adolf Hitler explains how the core concepts of which Nationalism compliments Socialism. They are, in reality, synonymous, away from Marxist distortion:
"... and this, my dear friends, this transformation of these two concepts, socialism and nationalism, is in reality a rapprochement of the two. For then this happens: socialism becomes nationalism, nationalism becomes socialism. They are both one, socialism and nationalism. They are the greatest fighters for their own people, the greatest fighters in the struggle for existence on earth, and thus they are no longer battle cries against each other, but a battle cry that shapes its life according to this slogan." [1]
The inferiority of Marxism lies in the fact that it does not place the people (race) first above all. It places the economy first. In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote: "whenever economic interests dominated the life of the people, and pushed transcendent ideals into the background, the state collapsed; and economic ruin followed soon thereafter." [2] The effects of the removal of differences in human beings becomes catastrophic for the development of a nation as it does not recognize the scientific fact of heredity. [3]
HOW DOES MARXISM AID JUDAISM?
The invitation of racial chaos into society through the lens of class struggle only fragmentizes the country through endless infighting. The forceful destruction of the culture of society benefits the parasitic nature of the jews in their goal for alienating the Volk against each other. Whether Marxism can be anti-jewish in this sense is completely out of the question. We must look at its practical uses. Whatever helps the destruction of European societies is beneficial to Judaism.
Judaism in its development and values is completely foreign to Germanic ideals. One builds and one destroys. It is just as false of a religion as Islam. In the jewish holy books, they believe they are chosen by God (Deuteronomy 7:6) to rule the earth. In the Talmud, it speaks of rabbis saying living in the land of Israel is the fundamental context for a direct, unbroken relationship with God. [4] This supremacism of the jewish race is incompatible with the survival of Aryan humanity and must be opposed.
๐๐ ๐ก๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ฆ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐๐, ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐๐๐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ถ๐๐บ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ถ๐๐บ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐น ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฝ. ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ.
Source:
[1] BArch NS 26/54 Rede vom 06. Mรคrz 1927 in Vilsbiburg p.267-269
[2] Mein Kampf (Dalton), p.211
[3] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1934 #02 p.14-16
[4] Babylonian Talmud, Ketubot 110b (The William Davidson Edition)
Defending National Socialism
Almost everywhere in modern day do we see the effects of Judaism on our culture through controlling of the media/press and relentless foreign lobbying for the interests of nations except our own. This is internationalism. in 1927, Adolf Hitler explains how the core concepts of which Nationalism compliments Socialism. They are, in reality, synonymous, away from Marxist distortion:
"... and this, my dear friends, this transformation of these two concepts, socialism and nationalism, is in reality a rapprochement of the two. For then this happens: socialism becomes nationalism, nationalism becomes socialism. They are both one, socialism and nationalism. They are the greatest fighters for their own people, the greatest fighters in the struggle for existence on earth, and thus they are no longer battle cries against each other, but a battle cry that shapes its life according to this slogan." [1]
The inferiority of Marxism lies in the fact that it does not place the people (race) first above all. It places the economy first. In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote: "whenever economic interests dominated the life of the people, and pushed transcendent ideals into the background, the state collapsed; and economic ruin followed soon thereafter." [2] The effects of the removal of differences in human beings becomes catastrophic for the development of a nation as it does not recognize the scientific fact of heredity. [3]
HOW DOES MARXISM AID JUDAISM?
The invitation of racial chaos into society through the lens of class struggle only fragmentizes the country through endless infighting. The forceful destruction of the culture of society benefits the parasitic nature of the jews in their goal for alienating the Volk against each other. Whether Marxism can be anti-jewish in this sense is completely out of the question. We must look at its practical uses. Whatever helps the destruction of European societies is beneficial to Judaism.
Judaism in its development and values is completely foreign to Germanic ideals. One builds and one destroys. It is just as false of a religion as Islam. In the jewish holy books, they believe they are chosen by God (Deuteronomy 7:6) to rule the earth. In the Talmud, it speaks of rabbis saying living in the land of Israel is the fundamental context for a direct, unbroken relationship with God. [4] This supremacism of the jewish race is incompatible with the survival of Aryan humanity and must be opposed.
๐๐ ๐ก๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ฆ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น๐ถ๐๐๐, ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐๐๐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ด๐ต ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ถ๐๐บ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ถ๐๐บ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐น ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฝ. ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ.
Source:
[1] BArch NS 26/54 Rede vom 06. Mรคrz 1927 in Vilsbiburg p.267-269
[2] Mein Kampf (Dalton), p.211
[3] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1934 #02 p.14-16
[4] Babylonian Talmud, Ketubot 110b (The William Davidson Edition)
๐22
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Exploring NS concepts using only NSDAP sources
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
1.) ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ
In Christianity, the body and soul are completely separate (Matthew 10:28). It would then follow that the soul is a universal non-race bound entity and only a means to directly connect to God. This is a completely false doctrine and contradicts biological determinism. What is true, is the body is the expression of the soul. In the ideological training booklet of the NDSAP Der Schulungsbrief, it says:
"Based on research, we now know that at the beginning of our era, the Germanic peoples entered history with a worldview corresponding to their racial characteristics. This worldview was founded on the one hand on their attitude towards blood, and on the other hand on their attitude towards the soil. For them, man was not an arbitrary aggregation of soul, mind, and body, each leading a separate existence independently of the others, but rather they saw in man the wholeness bound in the blood. Soul, mind, and body were not in competition with each other in terms of value. [...] It remained the prerogative of Jewish analytical intellect to elevate the soul to the highest and most important point of reference for human beings. No longer was the blood-bound, total human being the subject of evaluation, but rather the abstract concept of the soul, which, as the Church Father Augustine stated, is a non-spatial, immaterial substance, and is therefore the same for all people, independent of their blood. The political Church built its system of rule upon this pure doctrine of the soul. Both the mind and the body were now considered inferior to the soul." [1]
The racial soul is the expression of inherent biological traits tied to different races. This applies to both ethics and understanding. Head of the NSDAP's Office of Racial Policy Walter Groร wrote that: "Human values, for better or for worse, are no longer the result of a good or bad environment, but rather an expression of the hereditary traits that reside in a person's blood and are passed down from fathers and mothers. We cannot change them, nor can we arbitrarily recreate lost ones. Instead, according to our current understanding, we must imagine that a people enters its history with a fixed set of genetic predispositions, and that all these given genetic traits continue to circulate within that people until somewhere the flow of blood is interrupted, and thus a particle of the original predispositions is destroyed forever." [2]
In the Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte, it equally displays this proudly and adds that this is not a materialistic idea, but rather a life-affirming one:
"Just as National Socialism is not universalistic, it is equally not materialistic, because it stands once and for all beyond the antithesis of body and soul, matter and spirit, nature and supernature." [3]
The NS concept of body/soul is fundamentally incompatible with Christianity because sin/salvation of the soul is universal, not racial. Spirit value in the Christian framework isn't measured biologically. Hitler too, affirmed of the genetic predispositions of race.
Source:
[1] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #03 Seele, Geist und Kรถrper. Kampf gegen drei fremde Weltanschauungen von Kurt Ellersiek p.82-83
[2] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1934 #02 Der Rassengedanke Des Nationalsozialismus von Dr. Walter Groร p.16
[3] Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte: zentrale politische und kulturelle Zeitschrift der NSDAP 1938 "Von den inneren Krรคften der deutschen Geschichte" von Dr. Matthes Ziegler p.18
Exploring NS concepts using only NSDAP sources
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
1.) ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ
In Christianity, the body and soul are completely separate (Matthew 10:28). It would then follow that the soul is a universal non-race bound entity and only a means to directly connect to God. This is a completely false doctrine and contradicts biological determinism. What is true, is the body is the expression of the soul. In the ideological training booklet of the NDSAP Der Schulungsbrief, it says:
"Based on research, we now know that at the beginning of our era, the Germanic peoples entered history with a worldview corresponding to their racial characteristics. This worldview was founded on the one hand on their attitude towards blood, and on the other hand on their attitude towards the soil. For them, man was not an arbitrary aggregation of soul, mind, and body, each leading a separate existence independently of the others, but rather they saw in man the wholeness bound in the blood. Soul, mind, and body were not in competition with each other in terms of value. [...] It remained the prerogative of Jewish analytical intellect to elevate the soul to the highest and most important point of reference for human beings. No longer was the blood-bound, total human being the subject of evaluation, but rather the abstract concept of the soul, which, as the Church Father Augustine stated, is a non-spatial, immaterial substance, and is therefore the same for all people, independent of their blood. The political Church built its system of rule upon this pure doctrine of the soul. Both the mind and the body were now considered inferior to the soul." [1]
The racial soul is the expression of inherent biological traits tied to different races. This applies to both ethics and understanding. Head of the NSDAP's Office of Racial Policy Walter Groร wrote that: "Human values, for better or for worse, are no longer the result of a good or bad environment, but rather an expression of the hereditary traits that reside in a person's blood and are passed down from fathers and mothers. We cannot change them, nor can we arbitrarily recreate lost ones. Instead, according to our current understanding, we must imagine that a people enters its history with a fixed set of genetic predispositions, and that all these given genetic traits continue to circulate within that people until somewhere the flow of blood is interrupted, and thus a particle of the original predispositions is destroyed forever." [2]
In the Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte, it equally displays this proudly and adds that this is not a materialistic idea, but rather a life-affirming one:
"Just as National Socialism is not universalistic, it is equally not materialistic, because it stands once and for all beyond the antithesis of body and soul, matter and spirit, nature and supernature." [3]
The NS concept of body/soul is fundamentally incompatible with Christianity because sin/salvation of the soul is universal, not racial. Spirit value in the Christian framework isn't measured biologically. Hitler too, affirmed of the genetic predispositions of race.
Source:
[1] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #03 Seele, Geist und Kรถrper. Kampf gegen drei fremde Weltanschauungen von Kurt Ellersiek p.82-83
[2] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1934 #02 Der Rassengedanke Des Nationalsozialismus von Dr. Walter Groร p.16
[3] Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte: zentrale politische und kulturelle Zeitschrift der NSDAP 1938 "Von den inneren Krรคften der deutschen Geschichte" von Dr. Matthes Ziegler p.18
๐16
Unmasking "NS Heathenry Exposed"
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ Exploring NS concepts using only NSDAP sources ๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ 1.) ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ In Christianity, the body and soul are completely separate (Matthew 10:28). It would then follow thatโฆ
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Exploring NS concepts using only NSDAP sources
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
2.) ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง
Christianity views human history as an ongoing conflict between humanity and sin which later follows into a path of redemption. (Romans 5:12) This is another example of a false doctrine due to its Inconsideration to the idea of race and racial struggle. The National Socialist conception of world history is specifically racial struggle, not sin. Hitler offers a metaphor for this: "The sin against blood and race is the original sin in this world. It brings an end to every nation that commits it." [1] Hitler argued that we need a new conception of history more fitted to National Socialism. He specifically based this on racial struggle:
"We have no historical research that values the importance of the human races for the destiny of peoples (Vรถlker). We need a conception of history, which views history not as just compiling a series of battles, but that penetrates into the racial instincts of conquest, the primal racial elements. Then comes the new worldview! History instruction must lead to the original factors: race and racial instincts." [2]
Race is destiny. Without race, we are nothing as it hints at our own character (racial soul) and to believe in the Christian idea of free will would be contradictory to the racial determinism of National Socialist biology:
"But we must not forget that what our children inherit from us cannot be removed from them by any force in the world; that it constitutes their innermost being, which cannot be changed. And that is why we say: race is destiny. A destiny so cruel, so compelling, so controlling that it brands one person a criminal and makes another a genius. Neither is responsible for this. There is no free will in the sense that I could change and shape my character as I wish. My character, my essence, is there, is immutable, is given to me by fate; I do not control my character, but my character controls me." [3]
This is then backed up by the Hitler-Youth Journal on world history:
"We now see the meaning of world history not in whether the development of peoples, through the influence of Christianity, for example, has taken an inevitable course, or whether a universal idea of โโhumanity has bound all peoples together by a common bond, or whether the goal and meaning of our earthly existence will be achieved through the creation of a vast melting pot of peoples based on international solidarity, but rather in the extent to which the forces of race, in their struggle with and against national cultures, have prevailed and led to the victory of a culture appropriate to our race. From this perspective, world history appears to us as a continuous struggle of the most opposing elements, which do not follow any particular compulsion, but are the expression of a dynamic battle of the most diverse racial souls for dominance on this earth. That our view is correct is proven to us by the current, particularly sharp divide across the globe with a worldview that is designed to destroy the very best primal forces of Nordic blood and thus extinguish the lifeblood of the soul of the dominant race on this earth. We believe we can say that the struggle against Bolshevism is not merely a struggle of politics, economics, and sustenance, but a struggle between two worldviews that are as opposed as fire and water, because their foundations and spiritual sources spring from two fundamentally different racial souls." [4]
This idea of the world being a struggle between difference races is supported by Hitler.
Source:
[1] Mein Kampf (Dalton), p.306
[2] BArch NS 26/54 Rede vom 12. Juni 1925 in Plauen p.5
[3] Tornisterschrift des Oberkommando der Wehrmacht Abteilung Inland 1941 "Rassen und Rasse" p.13
[4] Wille und Macht. Jahrgang 3, Heft 18, 1935 Die Anfgaben des neuen Kampfes von Karlheinz Rรผdiger p.12
Exploring NS concepts using only NSDAP sources
๏ผฐ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ
2.) ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง
Christianity views human history as an ongoing conflict between humanity and sin which later follows into a path of redemption. (Romans 5:12) This is another example of a false doctrine due to its Inconsideration to the idea of race and racial struggle. The National Socialist conception of world history is specifically racial struggle, not sin. Hitler offers a metaphor for this: "The sin against blood and race is the original sin in this world. It brings an end to every nation that commits it." [1] Hitler argued that we need a new conception of history more fitted to National Socialism. He specifically based this on racial struggle:
"We have no historical research that values the importance of the human races for the destiny of peoples (Vรถlker). We need a conception of history, which views history not as just compiling a series of battles, but that penetrates into the racial instincts of conquest, the primal racial elements. Then comes the new worldview! History instruction must lead to the original factors: race and racial instincts." [2]
Race is destiny. Without race, we are nothing as it hints at our own character (racial soul) and to believe in the Christian idea of free will would be contradictory to the racial determinism of National Socialist biology:
"But we must not forget that what our children inherit from us cannot be removed from them by any force in the world; that it constitutes their innermost being, which cannot be changed. And that is why we say: race is destiny. A destiny so cruel, so compelling, so controlling that it brands one person a criminal and makes another a genius. Neither is responsible for this. There is no free will in the sense that I could change and shape my character as I wish. My character, my essence, is there, is immutable, is given to me by fate; I do not control my character, but my character controls me." [3]
This is then backed up by the Hitler-Youth Journal on world history:
"We now see the meaning of world history not in whether the development of peoples, through the influence of Christianity, for example, has taken an inevitable course, or whether a universal idea of โโhumanity has bound all peoples together by a common bond, or whether the goal and meaning of our earthly existence will be achieved through the creation of a vast melting pot of peoples based on international solidarity, but rather in the extent to which the forces of race, in their struggle with and against national cultures, have prevailed and led to the victory of a culture appropriate to our race. From this perspective, world history appears to us as a continuous struggle of the most opposing elements, which do not follow any particular compulsion, but are the expression of a dynamic battle of the most diverse racial souls for dominance on this earth. That our view is correct is proven to us by the current, particularly sharp divide across the globe with a worldview that is designed to destroy the very best primal forces of Nordic blood and thus extinguish the lifeblood of the soul of the dominant race on this earth. We believe we can say that the struggle against Bolshevism is not merely a struggle of politics, economics, and sustenance, but a struggle between two worldviews that are as opposed as fire and water, because their foundations and spiritual sources spring from two fundamentally different racial souls." [4]
This idea of the world being a struggle between difference races is supported by Hitler.
Source:
[1] Mein Kampf (Dalton), p.306
[2] BArch NS 26/54 Rede vom 12. Juni 1925 in Plauen p.5
[3] Tornisterschrift des Oberkommando der Wehrmacht Abteilung Inland 1941 "Rassen und Rasse" p.13
[4] Wille und Macht. Jahrgang 3, Heft 18, 1935 Die Anfgaben des neuen Kampfes von Karlheinz Rรผdiger p.12
๐12
แดสแด แด
แดแดแดสษชษดแดส แดแดษดแดสแดแด
ษชแดแดษชแดษด๊ฑ สแดแดแดกแดแดษด ษดแดแดษชแดษดแดส ๊ฑแดแดษชแดสษช๊ฑแด แดษดแด
แดสสษช๊ฑแดษชแดษดษชแดส
Getting into the philosophical concepts of National Socialism, we can point to two main ideas:
1.) ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ
National Socialist racial theory rejected the Christian separation of body and soul by arguing that the soul is biologically rooted in blood and race. Since Christianity teaches that the soul and salvation are universal and not determined by race, it demonstrates that the two concepts are irreconcilable.
2.) ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง
National Socialism rejects the Christian idea that human history is centered on universal sin and redemption, instead interpreting history as a biological and racial struggle between competing peoples and racial souls. The NS worldview is based on racial determinism and race-based destiny, not sin based destiny.
Biology is the basis for the National Socialist worldview. When taken to it's fullest extent, National Socialism points to the rejection of everything that is foreign. The first principle of National Socialism comes from the fact that: The Volk is the meaning and purpose of our existence.
Contemporary Third Reich comparisons between the National Socialist worldview and the Christian worldview:
SS training material from the Reich Security Main Office
Training Guide for SS leader candidates in the Sicherheitsdienst
Getting into the philosophical concepts of National Socialism, we can point to two main ideas:
1.) ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ
National Socialist racial theory rejected the Christian separation of body and soul by arguing that the soul is biologically rooted in blood and race. Since Christianity teaches that the soul and salvation are universal and not determined by race, it demonstrates that the two concepts are irreconcilable.
2.) ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง
National Socialism rejects the Christian idea that human history is centered on universal sin and redemption, instead interpreting history as a biological and racial struggle between competing peoples and racial souls. The NS worldview is based on racial determinism and race-based destiny, not sin based destiny.
Biology is the basis for the National Socialist worldview. When taken to it's fullest extent, National Socialism points to the rejection of everything that is foreign. The first principle of National Socialism comes from the fact that: The Volk is the meaning and purpose of our existence.
Contemporary Third Reich comparisons between the National Socialist worldview and the Christian worldview:
SS training material from the Reich Security Main Office
Training Guide for SS leader candidates in the Sicherheitsdienst
๐18
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐
The sad attempt by NS_Heathenry_Exposed to defame Nietzsche's philosophy
Much confusion about Nietzche and his philosophy has risen in both the 19th and 20th century. No source but National Socialist Germany has explained it better. In 1937, an article in Der Schulungsbrief explained it in detail showing that in Nietzsche's works, he believed: "the essence of the Jew "parasitic.", that the Jews falsified morality in Europe, etc. [1]
The NSDAP publication 'Willie und Macht' also addressed this too:
"Professorial guardians of the National Socialist idea warn: "Nietzsche was a friend of the jews." But they do not report that the few jews who came close to him personally became his most hateful enemies after a while [...] "Nietzsche was a German hater." But the fact that he rejected the Germany of the time because he wanted the Germany of the future, that from the depths of a German protest he detested the Wilhelminian fatherlandism, the shallowness of the patriotic attitude and educational madness, is kept quiet. [...] We National Socialists know it more clearly than the people of bygone eras: we do not grow through doctrines, but through people who present us with challenges, who call us to action, and who command us to insight. Friedrich Nietzsche is a man whose voice reaches far beyond our own days, admonishing and demanding into the distant future. In this sense, we confess to be Nietzsche's successors." [2]
Moreover, what type of anti-semitism did Nietzsche oppose? We can see easily that Nietzsche was against jews but in other places we see arguments against anti-semitism. This is easily explained:
"What Nietzsche primarily attacked about antisemitism has largely been overcome today. It is historical antisemitism of confessional, social, or economic forms, which lacks a modern biological basis, especially antisemitism based on mere negation. "Antisemites do not forgive Jews for having intellect and money. Antisemites is a name for those who have come down hard." And he names those anti-Semites, the latest speculators in idealism, who today roll their eyes in a Christian-Aryan-bourgeois way and, through a patience-exhausting abuse of the cheapest means of agitation, the moral attitude, seek to agitate all the brutish elements of the people. [...] He acknowledges that capable, strong-willed individuals fight among them, but argues that anti-Semitism is all the more harmful because it wastes and poisons so much capable energy, and that is precisely why he fights against it. However, he only wages wars where he cannot afford to belittle others. Nietzsche's position on antisemitism is decisive, overriding all personal and other influences. He contrasts a non-biologically based antisemitism with the Lamarckian misconception of possible Jewish assimilation." [3]
National Socialists including Hitler never saw Nietzsche as an enemy but as a friend to our worldview.
Source:
[1] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #08 "Friedrich Nietzsche: Der unerbittliche Werter des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts" p.295-296
[2] Wille und Macht. "Bekenntnis zu Nietzsche" Jahrgang 3/4, Heft 24/1 1935 p.31-32
[3] Heinrich Hรคrtle, Nietzsche und der Nationalsozialismus (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, Franz Eher Nachf., 1944) p.48-49
SEE: HITLER AND NIETZSCHE
The sad attempt by NS_Heathenry_Exposed to defame Nietzsche's philosophy
Much confusion about Nietzche and his philosophy has risen in both the 19th and 20th century. No source but National Socialist Germany has explained it better. In 1937, an article in Der Schulungsbrief explained it in detail showing that in Nietzsche's works, he believed: "the essence of the Jew "parasitic.", that the Jews falsified morality in Europe, etc. [1]
The NSDAP publication 'Willie und Macht' also addressed this too:
"Professorial guardians of the National Socialist idea warn: "Nietzsche was a friend of the jews." But they do not report that the few jews who came close to him personally became his most hateful enemies after a while [...] "Nietzsche was a German hater." But the fact that he rejected the Germany of the time because he wanted the Germany of the future, that from the depths of a German protest he detested the Wilhelminian fatherlandism, the shallowness of the patriotic attitude and educational madness, is kept quiet. [...] We National Socialists know it more clearly than the people of bygone eras: we do not grow through doctrines, but through people who present us with challenges, who call us to action, and who command us to insight. Friedrich Nietzsche is a man whose voice reaches far beyond our own days, admonishing and demanding into the distant future. In this sense, we confess to be Nietzsche's successors." [2]
Moreover, what type of anti-semitism did Nietzsche oppose? We can see easily that Nietzsche was against jews but in other places we see arguments against anti-semitism. This is easily explained:
"What Nietzsche primarily attacked about antisemitism has largely been overcome today. It is historical antisemitism of confessional, social, or economic forms, which lacks a modern biological basis, especially antisemitism based on mere negation. "Antisemites do not forgive Jews for having intellect and money. Antisemites is a name for those who have come down hard." And he names those anti-Semites, the latest speculators in idealism, who today roll their eyes in a Christian-Aryan-bourgeois way and, through a patience-exhausting abuse of the cheapest means of agitation, the moral attitude, seek to agitate all the brutish elements of the people. [...] He acknowledges that capable, strong-willed individuals fight among them, but argues that anti-Semitism is all the more harmful because it wastes and poisons so much capable energy, and that is precisely why he fights against it. However, he only wages wars where he cannot afford to belittle others. Nietzsche's position on antisemitism is decisive, overriding all personal and other influences. He contrasts a non-biologically based antisemitism with the Lamarckian misconception of possible Jewish assimilation." [3]
National Socialists including Hitler never saw Nietzsche as an enemy but as a friend to our worldview.
Source:
[1] NSDAP Schulungsbrief 1937 #08 "Friedrich Nietzsche: Der unerbittliche Werter des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts" p.295-296
[2] Wille und Macht. "Bekenntnis zu Nietzsche" Jahrgang 3/4, Heft 24/1 1935 p.31-32
[3] Heinrich Hรคrtle, Nietzsche und der Nationalsozialismus (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, Franz Eher Nachf., 1944) p.48-49
SEE: HITLER AND NIETZSCHE
๐17
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ง "๐๐" ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐ฆ
Pointing out the hypocrisy behind Anti-NSHeathenry Slander
All over twitter which are getting thousands upon thousands of views, are primarily from these groups: Non-Whites and people spamming AI in argumentation, while projecting this onto NS Heathenry.
We are here to stay and we will continue to fight for National Socialism.
โก๏ธโก๏ธ
Pointing out the hypocrisy behind Anti-NSHeathenry Slander
All over twitter which are getting thousands upon thousands of views, are primarily from these groups: Non-Whites and people spamming AI in argumentation, while projecting this onto NS Heathenry.
We are here to stay and we will continue to fight for National Socialism.
โก๏ธโก๏ธ
๐24
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐๐๐?
It means that we acknowledge the Divine Creator of the Universe who created our Blood. That the Blood He created supersedes all recorded dogma, all superficial religion.
It is this eternal iron law of the Blood that we follow, established directly by the Creator himself, which cannot ever be manipulated nor construed
For without the Blood, no higher culture would be conceivable or otherwise maintained
Therefore the preservation of the nobler elements of our Blood is the prerequisite to any higher culture, which includes all religion.
This is the dominant force behind National Socialism, which dominates all of world history.
It means that we acknowledge the Divine Creator of the Universe who created our Blood. That the Blood He created supersedes all recorded dogma, all superficial religion.
It is this eternal iron law of the Blood that we follow, established directly by the Creator himself, which cannot ever be manipulated nor construed
For without the Blood, no higher culture would be conceivable or otherwise maintained
Therefore the preservation of the nobler elements of our Blood is the prerequisite to any higher culture, which includes all religion.
This is the dominant force behind National Socialism, which dominates all of world history.
๐24
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐
The pure lack of common knowledge on the NSDAP
A post with thousands of views portrays the book "War Jesus Jude?" as an official NSDAP publication when it explicitly says the opposite in the book. The cover of the book clearly displays that it was published by "Verlag des Evangelischen Bundes" then at the end of the book it explicitly states it was printed by "A. Heine G.m.b.H., Grรคfenhainichen". It's not by Franz Eher Nachfolger GmbH.
The worst part is the fact that it seems like they haven't read the book at all. Paul Massler answers the question on the linage of Jesus on page 4:
"It is pointless for us from the outset to even attempt to ascribe to him [Jesus] a Nordic character, as even H. St. Chamberlain tried so desperately. Such attempts are nothing more than wishful thinking and constructions devoid of any scientific proof. According to the New Testament, there is absolutely no doubt that Jesus was Jewish by blood. We are speaking here, first and foremost, of Jesus the man. Paul also emphasizes this Jewish lineage when he says in Romans 9:5 that Jesus came from the fathers according to the flesh."
Then the quote that's posted by both "NSDAP was Christian" and "NSDAP Loved Christ" seems to have omitted the very next line below it affirming that Jesus belonged to the jewish people at the end of the day.
What a joke.
The pure lack of common knowledge on the NSDAP
A post with thousands of views portrays the book "War Jesus Jude?" as an official NSDAP publication when it explicitly says the opposite in the book. The cover of the book clearly displays that it was published by "Verlag des Evangelischen Bundes" then at the end of the book it explicitly states it was printed by "A. Heine G.m.b.H., Grรคfenhainichen". It's not by Franz Eher Nachfolger GmbH.
The worst part is the fact that it seems like they haven't read the book at all. Paul Massler answers the question on the linage of Jesus on page 4:
"It is pointless for us from the outset to even attempt to ascribe to him [Jesus] a Nordic character, as even H. St. Chamberlain tried so desperately. Such attempts are nothing more than wishful thinking and constructions devoid of any scientific proof. According to the New Testament, there is absolutely no doubt that Jesus was Jewish by blood. We are speaking here, first and foremost, of Jesus the man. Paul also emphasizes this Jewish lineage when he says in Romans 9:5 that Jesus came from the fathers according to the flesh."
Then the quote that's posted by both "NSDAP was Christian" and "NSDAP Loved Christ" seems to have omitted the very next line below it affirming that Jesus belonged to the jewish people at the end of the day.
What a joke.
๐25
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
The National Socialist state endorses morality based on loyalty to the race
"When the Pope, in his encyclical, describes the situation of Catholics in Germany "Mit brennender Sorge," we state unequivocally that we, too, are filled "with burning concern." Our burning concern is the purity, health, and vitality of the millions of boys and girls who will one day be the men and women of our nation. We want these boys and girls not to be torn apart by denominational discord, not to be mentally and physically abused by false seducers, and not to be raised in a monastic, dull, clerical narrow-mindedness against the state, but rather for a generation to grow up strengthened by a robust morality, educated in love of homeland, loyalty to the people, trust in the state, and a worldview whose strength is continually renewed by the unbroken power of the coming generation."
Source: Hakenkreuzbanner: NS-Tageszeitung fรผr Mannheim u. Nordbaden, Sonntag-Ausgabe 13.06.1937 p.4
SEE: GERMAN LAW ABOVE VATICAN LAW
The National Socialist state endorses morality based on loyalty to the race
"When the Pope, in his encyclical, describes the situation of Catholics in Germany "Mit brennender Sorge," we state unequivocally that we, too, are filled "with burning concern." Our burning concern is the purity, health, and vitality of the millions of boys and girls who will one day be the men and women of our nation. We want these boys and girls not to be torn apart by denominational discord, not to be mentally and physically abused by false seducers, and not to be raised in a monastic, dull, clerical narrow-mindedness against the state, but rather for a generation to grow up strengthened by a robust morality, educated in love of homeland, loyalty to the people, trust in the state, and a worldview whose strength is continually renewed by the unbroken power of the coming generation."
Source: Hakenkreuzbanner: NS-Tageszeitung fรผr Mannheim u. Nordbaden, Sonntag-Ausgabe 13.06.1937 p.4
SEE: GERMAN LAW ABOVE VATICAN LAW
๐17
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Arguments against the book Die groรe Lรผge des politischen Katholizismus from the Vatican Radio
Reports from Sicherheitsdienst surveillance documented a piece in October 29, 1938 of the Vatican saying the following:
"Dieter Schwarz has published a pamphlet with the NSDAP's central publishing house in Berlin entitled "The Great Lie of Political Catholicism." This is a shoddy piece of work that, in itself, wouldn't deserve any serious attention. However, since the text is clearly written for propaganda purposes and launches an outrageous attack on Catholicism as a whole, we will briefly examine it this evening. Right in the opening sentences, the reader is informed of the lie referred to in the title. It states: "For five years now, the foreign atrocity propaganda against Germany has been reporting on the persecution of Christians in National Socialist Germany, on the suppression of religion, the stifling of all religious activity, and the systematic promotion of godlessness in National Socialist Germany." So much for the first sentence, and the second immediately identifies who is accused of lying. It states that the church leaders, both large and small, in Germany and around the world, as well as the highest echelons of the Catholic Church in Rome, meet here in a peculiar and rare unanimity, often in complete agreement of words and details presented, with the international propaganda of lies against Germany that otherwise flows from Jewish-Marxist sources. Pastors write, Catholic newspapers, speeches, and circulars from the highest church authorities breathe the spirit of this political incitement. Two claims are thus made: 1) The persecution of the Church in Germany is a lie, and 2) the liars are the princes of the Church. Naturally, one is now eager to see how the author proves his accusations. The reader takes it for granted that the author will systematically examine the claims of the Pope and the bishops and demonstrate that they are not based on truth. But here, one is immediately disappointed. Not the slightest attempt is made to refute even one of the many precisely defined complaints of the bishops. It is not even known whether the author is familiar with the bishops' statements or has ever bothered to read the pastoral letters. It is clear, therefore, that the writer has taken the easy way out. [...] Why does the author say nothing about the enormous promotion of the movement to leave the Church, about the dismantling of almost all Catholic organizations, about the flooding of the entire country with unprecedentedly inflammatory, anti-Church literature, about the ruthless closure of denominational schools, about the confiscation of papal and episcopal pastoral letters, about the police searches of episcopal offices, about the anti-Christian propaganda in state organizations, etc.? The author of the pamphlet probably knows why he is concealing these things."
Source: BArch NS 2/64 รberwachung des Vatikansenders (Bericht des Chefs der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD) p.404-406
SEE: THE ATTITUDE OF THE VATICAN TOWARDS NS GERMANY
Arguments against the book Die groรe Lรผge des politischen Katholizismus from the Vatican Radio
Reports from Sicherheitsdienst surveillance documented a piece in October 29, 1938 of the Vatican saying the following:
"Dieter Schwarz has published a pamphlet with the NSDAP's central publishing house in Berlin entitled "The Great Lie of Political Catholicism." This is a shoddy piece of work that, in itself, wouldn't deserve any serious attention. However, since the text is clearly written for propaganda purposes and launches an outrageous attack on Catholicism as a whole, we will briefly examine it this evening. Right in the opening sentences, the reader is informed of the lie referred to in the title. It states: "For five years now, the foreign atrocity propaganda against Germany has been reporting on the persecution of Christians in National Socialist Germany, on the suppression of religion, the stifling of all religious activity, and the systematic promotion of godlessness in National Socialist Germany." So much for the first sentence, and the second immediately identifies who is accused of lying. It states that the church leaders, both large and small, in Germany and around the world, as well as the highest echelons of the Catholic Church in Rome, meet here in a peculiar and rare unanimity, often in complete agreement of words and details presented, with the international propaganda of lies against Germany that otherwise flows from Jewish-Marxist sources. Pastors write, Catholic newspapers, speeches, and circulars from the highest church authorities breathe the spirit of this political incitement. Two claims are thus made: 1) The persecution of the Church in Germany is a lie, and 2) the liars are the princes of the Church. Naturally, one is now eager to see how the author proves his accusations. The reader takes it for granted that the author will systematically examine the claims of the Pope and the bishops and demonstrate that they are not based on truth. But here, one is immediately disappointed. Not the slightest attempt is made to refute even one of the many precisely defined complaints of the bishops. It is not even known whether the author is familiar with the bishops' statements or has ever bothered to read the pastoral letters. It is clear, therefore, that the writer has taken the easy way out. [...] Why does the author say nothing about the enormous promotion of the movement to leave the Church, about the dismantling of almost all Catholic organizations, about the flooding of the entire country with unprecedentedly inflammatory, anti-Church literature, about the ruthless closure of denominational schools, about the confiscation of papal and episcopal pastoral letters, about the police searches of episcopal offices, about the anti-Christian propaganda in state organizations, etc.? The author of the pamphlet probably knows why he is concealing these things."
Source: BArch NS 2/64 รberwachung des Vatikansenders (Bericht des Chefs der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD) p.404-406
SEE: THE ATTITUDE OF THE VATICAN TOWARDS NS GERMANY
๐16
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐?
Investigating the purpose of why NS_Heathenry_Exposed flaunts this report
Even when we look at their own post, it states EXACTLY why he was rejected: "His political plans for a Romano-Germanic Imperium are of a utopian character". Yet, any type of relevance towards Evola in this context was because he was not a christian.
The Truth: Evola was rejected for his Anti-NS ideas, not simply because of 'paganism' in itself.
In Evola's "Pagan Imperialism", he writes that:
"The error of certain race fanatics who think that the reintegration of a race in its ethnic unity signifies ipso facto the rebirth of a people, lives exactly here: they regard man as if he could be regarded as horses, cats, or dogs of a โpure breedโ. The preservation or the restoration of the purity of race in the narrowest sense, can be everything in an animal, but not in man - in the man of superior type: even for man, it can constitute a condition which may be necessary under certain aspects, is not sufficient in any case, since the racial factor is not the only one which defines man. [...] The aristocratic idea of a tradition of Leaders - NOT the democratic or โnationalistโ idea, which depends upon the mere community of blood, soil, and birth - must be the foundation and axis of every doctrine of race rightly understood - of our restoration."
In the later published book 'Notes on the Third Reich', Evola provides his own analysis of National Socialism. Here, his critique of core NS doctrines are no different:
"In the second place, when dealing with Fascism, we have already recognised the legitimacy that could be offered by the ideal of a new, superior human type at the centre of a general process of crystallisation, rectification and formation of a nationโs substance, on the condition that we do not excessively emphasise the biological aspect in this ideal, but only if we particularly stress the โrace of the spirit.โ Instead, in National Socialist racism it was precisely this biological aspect that played a significant role and indulged in wishful thinking by means of a โscientisticโ mental deformation, when it was thought that all that had to be done was to discover prophylaxis and erect barriers against crossbreeding and miscegenation, along with more eugenic measures, so that lost virtues would reappear, the idea being that, almost automatically, man would arise again as the creator of a higher culture."
"Not only the ancient German traditions, but also the very concept of Reich and, as we shall see, the concept of race were brought by Hitler to the level of the masses, which implied their degradation and distortion."
Head of the Office of Racial Policy Walther Groร made clear the importance of the racial doctrine:
"All of this is necessary, not for the sake of some theoretical-intellectual nonsense, but to give people back the connection with the great laws of life, the understanding and the inner growth into the primitive but ultimately great sensations and feelings of the living human being that sustain life itself. All of this is necessary. However, an attitude to life that is geared towards the newly discovered laws of life of race, blood and soil is not just a matter for the parlor scholar, not a matter that is only presented at the lectern, about which one only writes in a book, which one only speaks about on the radio, about which one only makes laws - but it is a matter that concerns us all and every single one of us, day by day and hour by hour of our entire lives. Because on this question, whether it will be possible to give the people, all of us and everyone else outside, a new purpose in life, the future ultimately lies before us and our children."
Based on this, it makes perfect sense why Julius Evola was rejected. This is so easily clear to anyone who has actually read through his works.
Source:
[1] Pagan Imperialism by Julius Evola
[2] Notes On The Third Reich by Julius Evola
[3] Der Schulungsbrief #4 1939 "Volk und Rasse" von Dr Walther Groร
Investigating the purpose of why NS_Heathenry_Exposed flaunts this report
Even when we look at their own post, it states EXACTLY why he was rejected: "His political plans for a Romano-Germanic Imperium are of a utopian character". Yet, any type of relevance towards Evola in this context was because he was not a christian.
The Truth: Evola was rejected for his Anti-NS ideas, not simply because of 'paganism' in itself.
In Evola's "Pagan Imperialism", he writes that:
"The error of certain race fanatics who think that the reintegration of a race in its ethnic unity signifies ipso facto the rebirth of a people, lives exactly here: they regard man as if he could be regarded as horses, cats, or dogs of a โpure breedโ. The preservation or the restoration of the purity of race in the narrowest sense, can be everything in an animal, but not in man - in the man of superior type: even for man, it can constitute a condition which may be necessary under certain aspects, is not sufficient in any case, since the racial factor is not the only one which defines man. [...] The aristocratic idea of a tradition of Leaders - NOT the democratic or โnationalistโ idea, which depends upon the mere community of blood, soil, and birth - must be the foundation and axis of every doctrine of race rightly understood - of our restoration."
In the later published book 'Notes on the Third Reich', Evola provides his own analysis of National Socialism. Here, his critique of core NS doctrines are no different:
"In the second place, when dealing with Fascism, we have already recognised the legitimacy that could be offered by the ideal of a new, superior human type at the centre of a general process of crystallisation, rectification and formation of a nationโs substance, on the condition that we do not excessively emphasise the biological aspect in this ideal, but only if we particularly stress the โrace of the spirit.โ Instead, in National Socialist racism it was precisely this biological aspect that played a significant role and indulged in wishful thinking by means of a โscientisticโ mental deformation, when it was thought that all that had to be done was to discover prophylaxis and erect barriers against crossbreeding and miscegenation, along with more eugenic measures, so that lost virtues would reappear, the idea being that, almost automatically, man would arise again as the creator of a higher culture."
"Not only the ancient German traditions, but also the very concept of Reich and, as we shall see, the concept of race were brought by Hitler to the level of the masses, which implied their degradation and distortion."
Head of the Office of Racial Policy Walther Groร made clear the importance of the racial doctrine:
"All of this is necessary, not for the sake of some theoretical-intellectual nonsense, but to give people back the connection with the great laws of life, the understanding and the inner growth into the primitive but ultimately great sensations and feelings of the living human being that sustain life itself. All of this is necessary. However, an attitude to life that is geared towards the newly discovered laws of life of race, blood and soil is not just a matter for the parlor scholar, not a matter that is only presented at the lectern, about which one only writes in a book, which one only speaks about on the radio, about which one only makes laws - but it is a matter that concerns us all and every single one of us, day by day and hour by hour of our entire lives. Because on this question, whether it will be possible to give the people, all of us and everyone else outside, a new purpose in life, the future ultimately lies before us and our children."
Based on this, it makes perfect sense why Julius Evola was rejected. This is so easily clear to anyone who has actually read through his works.
Source:
[1] Pagan Imperialism by Julius Evola
[2] Notes On The Third Reich by Julius Evola
[3] Der Schulungsbrief #4 1939 "Volk und Rasse" von Dr Walther Groร
๐22
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
ยซFurthermore, at Munich, on 23 April 1935, the Gestapo had sent out confidential instructions on how to handle the Jesuits. Entitled "Safeguarding against the Jesuits,โ the document called attention to the Jesuit opposition to the Nazis in their public statements. "These lectures, moreover, are so ambiguously and cunningly composed that a juridical punishment of the lecturer is possible in only very few cases," stated the police instruction [...] By 1939, then, the Jesuit schools, like all religious schools, had been deprived of state recognition and support. Rather than operate schools dedicated to the principles of National Socialism, the Jesuits realized that they would more effectively thwart the influence of the Hitler-Jugend by ceasing to operate under the new conditions. [...] One should not forget that the seminaries of the Society of Jesus in Frankfurt, Pullach and Valkenburg were all restricted in their operations either directly by the Nazis or by the circumstances of the war. Likewise, in 1941, the Nazis had put an end to the Jesuit residences at Aachen, Berlin, Bonn, Cologne, Diisseldorf, Essen, Hoheneichen, Mittelsteine, Munich and Miinster. By this time, the Nazis were successfully implementing their harsh decrees against the church and its religious groups.ยป
From: Lapomarda, Vincent A. The Jesuits and the Third Reich. Edwin Mellen Press, 1989. p.13, 15, 21
SEE: DISMISSAL OF JESUITS FROM THE WEHRMACHT
ยซFurthermore, at Munich, on 23 April 1935, the Gestapo had sent out confidential instructions on how to handle the Jesuits. Entitled "Safeguarding against the Jesuits,โ the document called attention to the Jesuit opposition to the Nazis in their public statements. "These lectures, moreover, are so ambiguously and cunningly composed that a juridical punishment of the lecturer is possible in only very few cases," stated the police instruction [...] By 1939, then, the Jesuit schools, like all religious schools, had been deprived of state recognition and support. Rather than operate schools dedicated to the principles of National Socialism, the Jesuits realized that they would more effectively thwart the influence of the Hitler-Jugend by ceasing to operate under the new conditions. [...] One should not forget that the seminaries of the Society of Jesus in Frankfurt, Pullach and Valkenburg were all restricted in their operations either directly by the Nazis or by the circumstances of the war. Likewise, in 1941, the Nazis had put an end to the Jesuit residences at Aachen, Berlin, Bonn, Cologne, Diisseldorf, Essen, Hoheneichen, Mittelsteine, Munich and Miinster. By this time, the Nazis were successfully implementing their harsh decrees against the church and its religious groups.ยป
From: Lapomarda, Vincent A. The Jesuits and the Third Reich. Edwin Mellen Press, 1989. p.13, 15, 21
SEE: DISMISSAL OF JESUITS FROM THE WEHRMACHT
๐18